![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is anyone using the new fiberglass process called Resin Infusion?
This is the process where you lay all of your fiber reinforcements down dry (along with core material if required), then seal inside a vacuum bag (which you can take all the time you want, no need to hurry as in normal vacuum bagging proceedures), and then inject the resin which wets out the reinforcements. I have been using this process on my homebuilt sailboat (Core Cell foam core, epoxy resin) and I am having terrific results. Resin ratios of 30 to 35% by weight. And best of all, no mess or fumes, sticky rollers, paint brushes, etc. Check out my web site at http://home.houston.rr.com/pieceofwork/ . I learned much of my fiberglass techniques from the aircraft homebuilders web sites, so maybe I can return the favor. If you are ever in Houston, stop by. Steve G Houston, Texas Remove the 'NS' from my email address to reply. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steve" wrote in message ... Is anyone using the new fiberglass process called Resin Infusion? This is the process where you lay all of your fiber reinforcements down dry (along with core material if required), then seal inside a vacuum bag (which you can take all the time you want, no need to hurry as in normal vacuum bagging proceedures), and then inject the resin which wets out the reinforcements. I have been using this process on my homebuilt sailboat (Core Cell foam core, epoxy resin) and I am having terrific results. Resin ratios of 30 to 35% by weight. And best of all, no mess or fumes, sticky rollers, paint brushes, etc. Check out my web site at http://home.houston.rr.com/pieceofwork/ . I learned much of my fiberglass techniques from the aircraft homebuilders web sites, so maybe I can return the favor. If you are ever in Houston, stop by. Steve G Houston, Texas Remove the 'NS' from my email address to reply. Fascinating. Thanks for the link and report. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I would think there would be a limit as to how many layers could be done at one time before the resin wouldn't penetrate all the way. I've been using Vinyl Ester Resin which has a lower viscosity than epoxy allowing better penetration so you can use a heavier, or more dense weave in the cloth. No problems with this, but as you say, it is viscosity dependent. You have to use low viscosity resins (both epoxy and VE commonly available) suited for the process. You cant use your standard hand layup stuff. I mostly layup 2 layers of 34oz triaxial stiched. But alot of my stuff is 4 layers 34oz and some is 4 layers 34oz with 2 or 3 layers 18oz biax. It wets it out OK, but the thicker the layup the longer it takes. So you have to plan properly, because the injection must be complete before the resin starts to gel. With the resins I use, usually around 2 hours. It looks like an impressive way to do the resin work and without the hurry. Plus you don't have to work out the air bubbles, or chase them around as we often do. Resin infusion yields some of the best void free composite work available today. Air bubbles are a thing of the past, but dry spots are possible (no resin). This is just something you learn to look out for and avoid the situations that cause them. If you miss one of these during injection and notice it, it is easily fixed during the injection. I'd think this could also work for small "patch work" if the bag could be sealed to the work surface with something like duct tape. You can seal using packing tape, but I have found that RI is not worth the trouble for small jobs, but a huge time and trouble saver on large jobs. It'd be interesting to get this to work on awkward shaped parts such as the engine mount reinforcements. Without having seen them, I don't know if this would be a good application or not. I would think you would set the reinforcements along with the 'normal' layup dry, and vacuum bag and RI the whole lot. Roger Halstead (K8RI EN73 & ARRL Life Member) www.rogerhalstead.com N833R World's oldest Debonair? (S# CD-2) If you are ever in Houston, stop by. Steve G Houston, Texas Remove the 'NS' from my email address to reply. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The link to VIP off of your report goes on for a little bit about
'prints' and imperfections caused by the process. Have you had much of a problem with this? The biggest hurdle with composites is getting that perfectly smooth finish, and there is precious little room for imperfections. I like the idea of having the time to make sure everything is laid out perfect before adding resin, but having to get rid of a big lump where the feeder line ran would seem to make it a pay-me-now or pay-me-later prospect. This can be a problem, but is easily avoided. My web site shows an injection technique that I used when I started. Since I have changed my infusion strategies. However, the feeder line as you see it could leave a lump or impression in the surface. The way I do it now, there is no problems. Check my web site again in a week or so, as I plan on updating it soon with some new pictures. My bulkheads turn out *very* smooth, textured from the peel ply. They are as perfect as the foam was. However, I think the other web sites are refering more to print through than impressions. I believe this is a factor with low resin content layups. However, I think that is something that can be taken care of when filling and sanding. I am not really worried about print through. -- ----Because I can---- http://www.ernest.isa-geek.org/ ------------------------ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve wrote:
This can be a problem, but is easily avoided. My web site shows an injection technique that I used when I started. Since I have changed my infusion strategies. However, the feeder line as you see it could leave a lump or impression in the surface. The way I do it now, there is no problems. Check my web site again in a week or so, as I plan on updating it soon with some new pictures. I've got it bookmarked and will keep checking back. The wings of the Delta are fiberglass, and are laid up on a flat surface and then mated to the ribs. You basically have an 8'x8' triangle that has to be wetted out at once. A technique that could eliminate the hurry and provide better results would be a godsend. Do you have any problems with pinholes? -- ----Because I can---- http://www.ernest.isa-geek.org/ ------------------------ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pinholes are not a problem. Infusing the resing fills all voids, even under
high vacuum. Unlike hand layup vacuum bag, high vacuums can pull resin into the bleeder, and result in pinholes. You may not completely fill the weave on the surface, depending on vacuum level. You can always reduce vacuum near the end of infuson to get a higher resin ratio. -- Steve G 281-376-2682 Houston, Texas Remove the 'NS' from my email address to reply. "Ernest Christley" wrote in message ... Steve wrote: This can be a problem, but is easily avoided. My web site shows an injection technique that I used when I started. Since I have changed my infusion strategies. However, the feeder line as you see it could leave a lump or impression in the surface. The way I do it now, there is no problems. Check my web site again in a week or so, as I plan on updating it soon with some new pictures. I've got it bookmarked and will keep checking back. The wings of the Delta are fiberglass, and are laid up on a flat surface and then mated to the ribs. You basically have an 8'x8' triangle that has to be wetted out at once. A technique that could eliminate the hurry and provide better results would be a godsend. Do you have any problems with pinholes? -- ----Because I can---- http://www.ernest.isa-geek.org/ ------------------------ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|