![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just a word or two of caution, folks. Sound levels in SEL airplanes
can exceed 90 dB A at the pilot's ear, and prolonged exposure to that level can lead to hearing loss. I stuff a couple of thousand bucks worth of electronics in each ear now, partly because I didn't use a headset in the airplane in my younger days (lots of gun fire and some evidence of family hearing loss are also factors). Even if you're not using the radio, protect your hearing. clear. Well, for me, make that C L E A R! (Can you hear me now?) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tony wrote:
Just a word or two of caution, folks. Sound levels in SEL airplanes can exceed 90 dB A at the pilot's ear, and prolonged exposure to that level can lead to hearing loss. I stuff a couple of thousand bucks worth of electronics in each ear now, partly because I didn't use a headset in the airplane in my younger days (lots of gun fire and some evidence of family hearing loss are also factors). Even if you're not using the radio, protect your hearing. clear. Well, for me, make that C L E A R! (Can you hear me now?) Huh? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mortimer Schnerd, RN wrote:
Tony wrote: Just a word or two of caution, folks. Sound levels in SEL airplanes can exceed 90 dB A at the pilot's ear, and prolonged exposure to that level can lead to hearing loss. I stuff a couple of thousand bucks worth of electronics in each ear now, partly because I didn't use a headset in the airplane in my younger days (lots of gun fire and some evidence of family hearing loss are also factors). Even if you're not using the radio, protect your hearing. clear. Well, for me, make that C L E A R! (Can you hear me now?) Huh? My wife use to work for an ENT for years and would tell of the train personal that don't wear hearing protection and have severe hearing loss. I see the fire truck personnel now have DC headsets. I ought to equip my car with ANR headsets. Notice how bad road noise is now even in good cars. -- Regards, Ross C-172F 180HP KSWI |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 9, 1:17 pm, Ross wrote:
Mortimer Schnerd, RN wrote: Tony wrote: Just a word or two of caution, folks. Sound levels in SEL airplanes can exceed 90 dB A at the pilot's ear, and prolonged exposure to that level can lead to hearing loss. I stuff a couple of thousand bucks worth of electronics in each ear now, partly because I didn't use a headset in the airplane in my younger days (lots of gun fire and some evidence of family hearing loss are also factors). Even if you're not using the radio, protect your hearing. clear. Well, for me, make that C L E A R! (Can you hear me now?) Huh? My wife use to work for an ENT for years and would tell of the train personal that don't wear hearing protection and have severe hearing loss. I see the fire truck personnel now have DC headsets. I ought to equip my car with ANR headsets. Notice how bad road noise is now even in good cars. -- Regards, Ross C-172F 180HP KSWI- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Unfortunately, while a Good Idea(tm) it may not be practical due to the motor vehicle laws - in Minnesota, it is illegal to have headphones in both ears while driving. It is my understanding that it is so that the driver is not isolated from the outside world (horns honking, sirens, general distraction) - I am sure the law came about before active noise cancellation headphones, though as those could actually enhance the driver's ability to hear such things. Cite: Minnesota Statutes 2006 169.471 TELEVISION; HEADPHONES. Subdivision 1. [snipped - pertains to television] Subd. 2. Use of headphones in vehicle. (a) No person, while operating a motor vehicle, shall wear headphones or earphones that are used in both ears simultaneously for purposes of receiving or listening to broadcasts or reproductions from radios, tape decks, or other sound-producing or transmitting devices. (b) Paragraph (a) does not prohibit: (1) the use of a hearing aid device by a person who needs the device; or (2) the use of a communication headset by a firefighter while operating a fire department emergency vehicle in response to an emergency. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
...for purposes of receiving
or listening to broadcasts or reproductions from radios, tape decks, or other sound-producing or transmitting devices. That's a key section. If you wear a noise cancelling headset which covers both ears, but not for the purpose of listending to radio (etc), then you're ok by that law. Jose -- Humans are pack animals. Above all things, they have a deep need to follow something, be it a leader, a creed, or a mob. Whosoever fully understands this holds the world in his hands. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9 Feb 2007 11:10:32 -0800, "Tony" wrote:
Just a word or two of caution, folks. Sound levels in SEL airplanes can exceed 90 dB A at the pilot's ear, and prolonged exposure to that level can lead to hearing loss. I stuff a couple of thousand bucks worth of electronics in each ear now, partly because I didn't use a headset in the airplane in my younger days (lots of gun fire and some evidence of family hearing loss are also factors). Even if you're not using the radio, protect your hearing. I took a Radio Shack sound meter aloft with me one day. 109 dB at chest level. I wear an ANR, now.... Ron Wanttaja |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tony writes:
Just a word or two of caution, folks. Sound levels in SEL airplanes can exceed 90 dB A at the pilot's ear, and prolonged exposure to that level can lead to hearing loss. I stuff a couple of thousand bucks worth of electronics in each ear now, partly because I didn't use a headset in the airplane in my younger days (lots of gun fire and some evidence of family hearing loss are also factors). Even if you're not using the radio, protect your hearing. Lower levels can also damage hearing over long periods. From what I've seen of measured sound levels in GA aircraft (and some larger aircraft), many pilots are risking significant hearing loss over the long term unless they wear effective protection against cockpit noise. In small aircraft, passengers should also wear ear protection. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mow here's a thought -- under MN law, is an airplane a 'motor
vechicle'? Maybe even if it is, runways are not highways and the state police do not patrol them so you can get away with your DCs. Now, some states (for personal safety reasons I am not listing my candidate states) very will might have a cop with a radar gun along a runway. Touch down hot and get a ticket (that of course would be a good idea anyhow). Get another one for wearing a headset. I think it's time for my meds. On Feb 9, 5:16 pm, "Randy Aldous" wrote: On Feb 9, 1:17 pm, Ross wrote: Mortimer Schnerd, RN wrote: Tony wrote: Just a word or two of caution, folks. Sound levels in SEL airplanes can exceed 90 dB A at the pilot's ear, and prolonged exposure to that level can lead to hearing loss. I stuff a couple of thousand bucks worth of electronics in each ear now, partly because I didn't use a headset in the airplane in my younger days (lots of gun fire and some evidence of family hearing loss are also factors). Even if you're not using the radio, protect your hearing. clear. Well, for me, make that C L E A R! (Can you hear me now?) Huh? My wife use to work for an ENT for years and would tell of the train personal that don't wear hearing protection and have severe hearing loss. I see the fire truck personnel now have DC headsets. I ought to equip my car with ANR headsets. Notice how bad road noise is now even in good cars. -- Regards, Ross C-172F 180HP KSWI- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Unfortunately, while a Good Idea(tm) it may not be practical due to the motor vehicle laws - in Minnesota, it is illegal to have headphones in both ears while driving. It is my understanding that it is so that the driver is not isolated from the outside world (horns honking, sirens, general distraction) - I am sure the law came about before active noise cancellation headphones, though as those could actually enhance the driver's ability to hear such things. Cite: Minnesota Statutes 2006 169.471 TELEVISION; HEADPHONES. Subdivision 1. [snipped - pertains to television] Subd. 2. Use of headphones in vehicle. (a) No person, while operating a motor vehicle, shall wear headphones or earphones that are used in both ears simultaneously for purposes of receiving or listening to broadcasts or reproductions from radios, tape decks, or other sound-producing or transmitting devices. (b) Paragraph (a) does not prohibit: (1) the use of a hearing aid device by a person who needs the device; or (2) the use of a communication headset by a firefighter while operating a fire department emergency vehicle in response to an emergency.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tony" wrote in news:1171080597.882749.305500
@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com: Mow here's a thought -- under MN law, is an airplane a 'motor vechicle'? Maybe even if it is, runways are not highways and the state police do not patrol them so you can get away with your DCs. Now, some states (for personal safety reasons I am not listing my candidate states) very will might have a cop with a radar gun along a runway. Touch down hot and get a ticket (that of course would be a good idea anyhow). Get another one for wearing a headset. What is the posted speed limit on the runway? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 10, 9:13 am, Judah wrote:
What is the posted speed limit on the runway? Rotation speed :-) Allen |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |