![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
;-))
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Marta" wrote in message
... ;-)) Well, even if it's a model, I like seeing them, it's at least partially on topic. -- Cheers Dave Kearton |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Marta" wrote in message ... ;-)) the clipped wings were for faster low level flight. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Marta" wrote in message ... Nice is in France - not Poland . . . |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ray O'Hara wrote:
"Marta" wrote in message ... ;-)) the clipped wings were for faster low level flight. That's not strictly true. The clipped wingtips allowed a faster roll rate. The greater low altitude performance was provided by cropped impeller blades on the supercharger. Many "low altitude" Spitfires *did* have both modifcations, but the clipped wingtips weren't actually necessary for low altitude work. The Mk.IX Spitfires were originally issued to squadrons with standard superchargers. Some batches were issued with cropped impeller blades and they became unofficially designated "Mk.IXb". All of these aircraft were built with full span wings. The "IXb" designation has caused problems for historians and modellers as it seems to imply that these aircraft had the "b"-type wing. This is not true. All early Mk.IXs were built with the "c"-type wing. The confusion was later cleared up with the introduction of the "e"-type wing. The unofficial designation "Mk.IXb" was replaced by the official designation "LF.IXc" Incidentally, the aircraft shown has the "e"-type wing. It could be a Mk.IX or a Mk.XVI. The difference between the two was that the Mk.IX had a Rolls-Royce Merlin engine while the Mk.XVI had a Packard Merlin. Some early XVIs were built with a full rear fuselage while some late IXs were built with a cutdown fuselage and bubble canopy. The presence of the bubble canopy does not automatically denote a Mk.XVI.. However, given that TB675 was an LF.XVIe with a bubble canopy, and has an earlier serial number than this aircraft, I would hazard a guess that TB995 is a late model F.IXe. -- Enzo I wear the cheese. It does not wear me. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Alfie" alfblume(a)hotmail.com wrote in message k... "Marta" wrote in message ... Nice is in France - not Poland . . . Took me a second on that, guess that shows how much the thinking has slowed down....good one. Bruce R |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Battle of Britain in Art, concluded - Spit.jpg (1/1) | Mitchell Holman | Aviation Photos | 0 | November 20th 06 12:33 PM |
Polish multiple tow | Martin Gregorie | Soaring | 2 | August 22nd 06 05:29 PM |
Polish | Claire Emson | Soaring | 4 | January 4th 05 08:10 PM |
paint like polish? | ivo welch | Owning | 6 | January 21st 04 05:47 PM |
polish victories | iowa | Military Aviation | 22 | October 22nd 03 07:36 PM |