![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
RAS fans may be interested in the results of an investigation by an
instructor/examiner in our club. The question is, do the PTS really require a slip all the way to landing without ever touching the spoilers? (Why? We fly from a short runway, surrounded by houses and trees, and we have modern, low drag gliders rather than 2-33s. For us, this is a chancy maneuver with an experienced instructor in back, and clearly dangerous to send solo students off to practice it on their own.) It turns out the answer is no; not only is the maneuver not part of the PTS, the FAA says examiners should not ask for it. But many examiners and FSDOs don't know this, and think that the maneuver is required. The official guidance is in the January 2000 designee update. Here's the relevant text: We have had questions on whether the applicant should complete the landing, with or without the use of drag devices. There was never any intent to require an applicant to complete the landing without the use of drag devices. The applicant is only required to demonstrate a slip (forward or side) without using drag devices, to position the glider for a safe landing. Element 6 of the TASK states; "make smooth, proper, and positive control applications during recovery from the slip." Once this has been accomplished, the maneuver being evaluated is over. The applicant then lands the glider within the designated landing area, using drag devices as appropriate. Most important for examiner standardization, the examiner should not add or decrease elements to this task, or any other task, by asking the applicant to do more or less than is required. The direct link is below, but will get broken up. You can find it by googling "faa desingee update." John Cochrane BB http://www.faa.gov/other_visit/aviat..._01_Update.pdf |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Instructors who attend CFI-G re-validation clinics
know this; it is discussed there regularly. Even if you (CFIs at large) get your renewal via powered aircraft venues or by having large numbers of successful candidates, it is a good idea to attend these clinics for the knowledgeable and sometimes heated discussions with a room full of CFI-Gs. At 15:24 15 April 2007, Bb wrote: RAS fans may be interested in the results of an investigation by an instructor/examiner in our club. The question is, do the PTS really require a slip all the way to landing without ever touching the spoilers? (Why? We fly from a short runway, surrounded by houses and trees, and we have modern, low drag gliders rather than 2-33s. For us, this is a chancy maneuver with an experienced instructor in back, and clearly dangerous to send solo students off to practice it on their own.) It turns out the answer is no; not only is the maneuver not part of the PTS, the FAA says examiners should not ask for it. But many examiners and FSDOs don't know this, and think that the maneuver is required. The official guidance is in the January 2000 designee update. Here's the relevant text: We have had questions on whether the applicant should complete the landing, with or without the use of drag devices. There was never any intent to require an applicant to complete the landing without the use of drag devices. The applicant is only required to demonstrate a slip (forward or side) without using drag devices, to position the glider for a safe landing. Element 6 of the TASK states; 'make smooth, proper, and positive control applications during recovery from the slip.' Once this has been accomplished, the maneuver being evaluated is over. The applicant then lands the glider within the designated landing area, using drag devices as appropriate. Most important for examiner standardization, the examiner should not add or decrease elements to this task, or any other task, by asking the applicant to do more or less than is required. The direct link is below, but will get broken up. You can find it by googling 'faa desingee update.' John Cochrane BB http://www.faa.gov/other_visit/aviat...ignees_delegat ions/designee_news/designee_updates/media/2000/2000_01_Update.pdf |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You are correct on both points. It isn't required and many CFIG's & DPE's
don't know that. In fact, as you also point out, there is danger involved. A danger is that a slip may taught as an alternative to spoilers - a trick to have in your back pocket "just in case". If a pilot of a slick, high performance glider mis-identifies the spoiler handle and, seeing no result from whatever handle he is pulling, reverts to a slip to complete the landing, he will almost certainly overshoot. Better training is to teach the pilot to identify why the 'spoilers' are having no effect - i.e. look at the handle. High performance gliders will slip nicely, but the resulting descent rate is often not high enough for a normal approach and landing - particularly not if the approach is begun with too much energy. I'm glad to see the FAA clarifying the slip requirement in the PTS. Bill Daniels "BB" wrote in message ups.com... RAS fans may be interested in the results of an investigation by an instructor/examiner in our club. The question is, do the PTS really require a slip all the way to landing without ever touching the spoilers? (Why? We fly from a short runway, surrounded by houses and trees, and we have modern, low drag gliders rather than 2-33s. For us, this is a chancy maneuver with an experienced instructor in back, and clearly dangerous to send solo students off to practice it on their own.) It turns out the answer is no; not only is the maneuver not part of the PTS, the FAA says examiners should not ask for it. But many examiners and FSDOs don't know this, and think that the maneuver is required. The official guidance is in the January 2000 designee update. Here's the relevant text: We have had questions on whether the applicant should complete the landing, with or without the use of drag devices. There was never any intent to require an applicant to complete the landing without the use of drag devices. The applicant is only required to demonstrate a slip (forward or side) without using drag devices, to position the glider for a safe landing. Element 6 of the TASK states; "make smooth, proper, and positive control applications during recovery from the slip." Once this has been accomplished, the maneuver being evaluated is over. The applicant then lands the glider within the designated landing area, using drag devices as appropriate. Most important for examiner standardization, the examiner should not add or decrease elements to this task, or any other task, by asking the applicant to do more or less than is required. The direct link is below, but will get broken up. You can find it by googling "faa desingee update." John Cochrane BB http://www.faa.gov/other_visit/aviat..._01_Update.pdf |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
With a Janus, DuoDiscus, ASW19... it is certainly a very efficient
alternative to airbreaks. "Bill Daniels" bildan@comcast-dot-net wrote in message . .. You are correct on both points. It isn't required and many CFIG's & DPE's don't know that. In fact, as you also point out, there is danger involved. A danger is that a slip may taught as an alternative to spoilers - a trick to have in your back pocket "just in case". If a pilot of a slick, high performance glider mis-identifies the spoiler handle and, seeing no result from whatever handle he is pulling, reverts to a slip to complete the landing, he will almost certainly overshoot. Better training is to teach the pilot to identify why the 'spoilers' are having no effect - i.e. look at the handle. High performance gliders will slip nicely, but the resulting descent rate is often not high enough for a normal approach and landing - particularly not if the approach is begun with too much energy. I'm glad to see the FAA clarifying the slip requirement in the PTS. Bill Daniels "BB" wrote in message ups.com... RAS fans may be interested in the results of an investigation by an instructor/examiner in our club. The question is, do the PTS really require a slip all the way to landing without ever touching the spoilers? (Why? We fly from a short runway, surrounded by houses and trees, and we have modern, low drag gliders rather than 2-33s. For us, this is a chancy maneuver with an experienced instructor in back, and clearly dangerous to send solo students off to practice it on their own.) It turns out the answer is no; not only is the maneuver not part of the PTS, the FAA says examiners should not ask for it. But many examiners and FSDOs don't know this, and think that the maneuver is required. The official guidance is in the January 2000 designee update. Here's the relevant text: We have had questions on whether the applicant should complete the landing, with or without the use of drag devices. There was never any intent to require an applicant to complete the landing without the use of drag devices. The applicant is only required to demonstrate a slip (forward or side) without using drag devices, to position the glider for a safe landing. Element 6 of the TASK states; "make smooth, proper, and positive control applications during recovery from the slip." Once this has been accomplished, the maneuver being evaluated is over. The applicant then lands the glider within the designated landing area, using drag devices as appropriate. Most important for examiner standardization, the examiner should not add or decrease elements to this task, or any other task, by asking the applicant to do more or less than is required. The direct link is below, but will get broken up. You can find it by googling "faa desingee update." John Cochrane BB http://www.faa.gov/other_visit/aviat..._01_Update.pdf |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() (Why? We fly from a short runway, surrounded by houses and trees, and we have modern, low drag gliders rather than 2-33s. For us, this is a chancy maneuver with an experienced instructor in back, and clearly dangerous to send solo students off to practice it on their own.) What is the length of your runway? Why is it a chancy maneuver with an experienced instructor in back? Do your instructors send solo students off to practice rope breaks on their own? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 16, 12:15 am, "Bert Willing" willing_no_spam_ple...@ir-
microsystems.com wrote: With a Janus, DuoDiscus, ASW19... it is certainly a very efficient alternative to airbreaks. For the ASW-19b the slip is also a very effective augmentation to full airbrakes. I regularly practiced full rudder, full airbrake, slips and used the technique more than once in a tight off airport landing. Andy |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The first FAA examiner I encountered misinterpreted the PTS as you
describe... insisting on slipping all the way to landing without spoilers. I canceled my test when I learned that, since I had not been trained on it. After trying it a few times with and without an instructor, we concluded that it was unlikely to be accomplished by a student pilot within the allowed distance. I researched it and found the designee update... went back to the FAA... and found that the guy had retired! The next guy understood the actual requirement. This caused me about a 2-month delay in taking my test. "BB" wrote in message ups.com... RAS fans may be interested in the results of an investigation by an instructor/examiner in our club. The question is, do the PTS really require a slip all the way to landing without ever touching the spoilers? (Why? We fly from a short runway, surrounded by houses and trees, and we have modern, low drag gliders rather than 2-33s. For us, this is a chancy maneuver with an experienced instructor in back, and clearly dangerous to send solo students off to practice it on their own.) It turns out the answer is no; not only is the maneuver not part of the PTS, the FAA says examiners should not ask for it. But many examiners and FSDOs don't know this, and think that the maneuver is required. The official guidance is in the January 2000 designee update. Here's the relevant text: We have had questions on whether the applicant should complete the landing, with or without the use of drag devices. There was never any intent to require an applicant to complete the landing without the use of drag devices. The applicant is only required to demonstrate a slip (forward or side) without using drag devices, to position the glider for a safe landing. Element 6 of the TASK states; "make smooth, proper, and positive control applications during recovery from the slip." Once this has been accomplished, the maneuver being evaluated is over. The applicant then lands the glider within the designated landing area, using drag devices as appropriate. Most important for examiner standardization, the examiner should not add or decrease elements to this task, or any other task, by asking the applicant to do more or less than is required. The direct link is below, but will get broken up. You can find it by googling "faa desingee update." John Cochrane BB http://www.faa.gov/other_visit/aviat..._01_Update.pdf |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Slips and spins in FSX? | Chris Wells | Simulators | 0 | December 14th 06 08:24 PM |
About forward slips | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 77 | November 2nd 06 11:35 PM |
A Jet Blue Aircraft Landing with Sideway Landing-Gear | Lufthansi | Piloting | 18 | July 19th 06 05:13 AM |
A Jet Blue Aircraft Landing with Sideway Landing-Gear | Hansi | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | July 17th 06 04:01 AM |
landing | franck jeamourra | Owning | 1 | February 10th 04 09:29 AM |