Just a question

Just a question to start some dialog. How many of you thank that we
actually landed on the moon and had the technology to do so in 1969. Keep
it friendly.

J. Fields, USAF Retired

"J.F." wrote in news:RwpTh.7944$u03.1129
@newssvr21.news.prodigy.net:

Just a question to start some dialog.


In a binaries group?


How many of you thank that we
actually landed on the moon and had the technology to do so in 1969. Keep
it friendly.

J. Fields, USAF Retired



Astronomers continue to bounce laser beams off the
reflectors that were left on the moon. Yes, the lunar
landings were real.


http://www.csr.utexas.edu/mlrs/

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/s...1c13laser.html

Yes I know that this is a binaries group and I have posted several pictures
in here. Take a look at this website
http://mrbasheer.tripod.com/moonwalk.htm Its enough to make people believe
that no one has ever been on the moon.


"Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
...
"J.F." wrote in news:RwpTh.7944$u03.1129
@newssvr21.news.prodigy.net:

Just a question to start some dialog.


In a binaries group?


How many of you thank that we
actually landed on the moon and had the technology to do so in 1969.
Keep
it friendly.

J. Fields, USAF Retired



Astronomers continue to bounce laser beams off the
reflectors that were left on the moon. Yes, the lunar
landings were real.


http://www.csr.utexas.edu/mlrs/

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/s...1c13laser.html

"Mitchell Holman" wrote:

"J.F." wrote:

Just a question to start some dialog.

In a binaries group?

How many of you thank that we
actually landed on the moon and had the technology to do so in 1969.
Keep
it friendly.

J. Fields, USAF Retired

Astronomers continue to bounce laser beams off the
reflectors that were left on the moon. Yes, the lunar
landings were real.

Just glancing at the books on one of my shelves--Taylor's
"Lunar Science: A Post-Apollo View," Short's "Planetary Geology,"
Chapman's "The Inner Planets"--the scientific evidence is far
more persuasive than anything offered by the hoax cranks.
None of them seem to know anything useful about astronomy,
photography or any other part of reality.

For that matter, the technology of 1969 wasn't capable of producing
a credible faked film of a lunar landing. Compare the lunar scenes
of "2001" to the films brought back from the Apollo landings.

The real question is, why do idiots waste time raising doubts
about the Apollo flights?

--Bill Thompson

"J.F." wrote:

Just a question to start some dialog. How many of you thank that we
actually landed on the moon and had the technology to do so in 1969. Keep
it friendly.

J. Fields, USAF Retired

this is a binaries group. you want discussion, go to a text group.

redc1c4,
pointing out the obvious, to the oblivious.
--
"Enlisted men are stupid, but extremely cunning and sly, and bear
considerable watching."

Army Officer's Guide

Exxor wrote:

On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 14:58:15 GMT, "William R Thompson"
wrote:

The real question is, why do idiots waste time raising doubts
about the Apollo flights?

Because they have no appreciation for the Conspiracy Industry's
explanation of how JFK escaped assassination by UFO on 9/11 in a
movie studio at Area 51.

now *that's* funny.............

redc1c4,
(glad i wasn't drinking my morning Coke when i read it. %-)
--
"Enlisted men are stupid, but extremely cunning and sly, and bear
considerable watching."

Army Officer's Guide

"redc1c4" wrote in message
...
"J.F." wrote:

Just a question to start some dialog. How many of you thank that we
actually landed on the moon and had the technology to do so in 1969.
Keep
it friendly.

J. Fields, USAF Retired

this is a binaries group. you want discussion, go to a text group.

redc1c4,
pointing out the obvious, to the oblivious.
--
"Enlisted men are stupid, but extremely cunning and sly, and bear
considerable watching."

Army Officer's Guide

Did the engine go south in this picture, or did some of the ordinance
explode?

thanx

Frank from Deeetroit wrote:

"redc1c4" wrote in message
...
"J.F." wrote:

Just a question to start some dialog. How many of you thank that we
actually landed on the moon and had the technology to do so in 1969.
Keep
it friendly.

J. Fields, USAF Retired

this is a binaries group. you want discussion, go to a text group.

redc1c4,
pointing out the obvious, to the oblivious.
--
"Enlisted men are stupid, but extremely cunning and sly, and bear
considerable watching."

Army Officer's Guide

Did the engine go south in this picture, or did some of the ordinance
explode?

thanx

neither:
someone forgot to seal the centerline fuel tank properly, and when it
was pressurized, the fuel naturally escaped out the vent.

when the fuel vapor reached the exhaust stream, it ignited. life
then got *very* exciting for the pilot. %-)

this was out at 29 Palms here in CA, hence the file name.

redc1c4,
who got his info from the sign at the airfield, waiting for a Huey.
--
"Enlisted men are stupid, but extremely cunning and sly, and bear
considerable watching."

Army Officer's Guide

On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 13:31:38 GMT, "J.F."
wrote:

Yes I know that this is a binaries group and I have posted several pictures
in here. Take a look at this website
http://mrbasheer.tripod.com/moonwalk.htm Its enough to make people believe
that no one has ever been on the moon.

The first two pictures (questions) at that website are easily
explained.

If you saw the movie of the flag you would notice that it is not
"fluttering" but in a fixed position. It is placed that way so that
you can see it is the U.S. flag. If you do a search for pictures of
that first landing on the moon, you will notice that the flag is
*always* "fluttering" in the same position. Now *that* would be a
trick to pull on earth.

Shadows? Measure the shadows of legs of the two men. Those are
equal. One shadow may be longer due to the flag being in the picture.
And if one shadow IS longer than the other, how could that trick be
done on earth.

As previously stated, we are still aiming lasers at the moon and
getting back reflections from devices placed there by astronauts.

"J.F." wrote in message
t...
Just a question to start some dialog. How many of you thank that we
actually landed on the moon and had the technology to do so in 1969. Keep
it friendly.

J. Fields, USAF Retired