![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The NPRM on the parachute repacking cycle comment period is open
through August 20, 2007. This change would extend the parachute repack cycle from 120-days to 180-days. Note that your comments (apart from what is stated in the copy on the SSA web site) may be made online. You do not have to register and login to submit comments. See http://dms.dot.gov/search/document.c...docketid=21829 Regards, Frank Whiteley SSA Governor, Colorado |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 26, 8:10 am, Frank Whiteley wrote:
The NPRM on the parachute repacking cycle comment period is open through August 20, 2007. This change would extend the parachute repack cycle from 120-days to 180-days. Note that your comments (apart from what is stated in the copy on the SSA web site) may be made online. You do not have to register and login to submit comments. Seehttp://dms.dot.gov/search/document.cfm?documentid=470180&docketid=21829 Regards, Frank Whiteley SSA Governor, Colorado It is about time. I don't remember for how long the repack cycle was "in works" but the 180 days would be great. AOPA also had this information in their e-letter. The info goes as follow: "FAA PROPOSES 180-DAY PARACHUTE PACKING INTERVAL Pilots who fly with parachutes--whether soaring in gliders, while performing aerobatics, or for any other reason--could get a longer interval between required packing inspections. The FAA is proposing to extend the packing interval ( http://www.aopa.org/epilot/redir.cfm?adid=11522 ) from 120 days to 180 days because the industry has shown that modern parachute materials last longer and actually hold up better with less frequent handling. This proposal stems from a request for an exemption from a number of groups representing pilots who use parachutes. The notice does not change the 60-day packing requirement for natural-fiber parachutes. To weigh in on the topic, send your comments by August 20 to the Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE, West Building, Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, D.C., 20590-0001. AOPA will be filing its own comments in support of the move." Some riggers might be upset about the 180 day repack cycle, couple of them stated that this will take away some of their income but I don't buy that. I am a Senior Parachute Rigger and I think that this will give us a chance to perform the repacks with better peace of mind: no phone calls in the middle of March from pilots needing the repack done "right now because the season is just about to begin" and also this will let bunch of pilots fly almost the entire season without repacking and worrying about it. This ruling will improve the wear aspect of canopy fabric throughout the life span of a parachute system simply because it is not handled as frequently. Jacek CFI, -G, Senior Parachute Rigger Washington State |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
No comment | Greasy Rider @ invalid.com | Simulators | 0 | December 9th 05 12:21 AM |
comment period reopened on DC area "ADIZ" | Bob Noel | Piloting | 3 | November 15th 05 04:39 PM |
Longer parachute repack cycle petition (USA) | Eric Greenwell | Soaring | 35 | November 5th 05 01:52 AM |
Washington ADIZ: Comment Period Extended | Jay Masino | Piloting | 9 | November 4th 05 10:01 PM |
Break-in Period for 0200A Continental Engine? | Larry | Home Built | 2 | April 19th 05 05:07 AM |