![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was wondering why the engine wasn't considered for the F-14 or why
the Air Force and Navy didn't do a joint thing and use it on both aircraft. Seems like it would have been a no-brainer. Of course with the way the F-100/F401-P-400 went, maybe that's being overly optimistic. AF was far more interested in reliability for the P-3/7/9 engines at that time than thrust. The P-100 fixed the trubine problemson the older engines problems but had fan problems of its own. The Navey later went to the GE F110 engine, at least in Ds. The early TF-30s had major operability problems(stalls) too because of the most comples hydromechanical control system on a jet engine and the DoD wanted them fixed, not more thrust IIRC. Digital control eventually resolved operability problems on mostengines. The PW F100-100/200 also had some major problems of the same sort, the Stall-Stagnation problem.. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GPT (Gulfport MS) ILS 14 question | A Lieberman | Instrument Flight Rules | 18 | January 30th 05 04:51 PM |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
Question | Charles S | Home Built | 4 | April 5th 04 09:10 PM |
Tecumseh Engine Mounting Question | jlauer | Home Built | 7 | November 16th 03 01:51 AM |
Question about Question 4488 | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | October 27th 03 01:26 AM |