![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is there a good correlation between the appearance of rain in a
developing CB and the point at which the storm reaches its peak? I'm familiar with the standard three stage picture of thunderstorm development, and the fact that if significant winds are present a storm can keep building despite the dissipating effect of rain. The context of my question is flying near tall cumulus under which strong rain is falling, but which has not yet developed into a full fledged thunderstorm. It would seem to me that the rain is dissipating the energy of the storm and that the storm is unlikely to continue towering into a thunderstorm (making it safer to skirt closer to). Jose -- There are two kinds of people in the world. Those that just want to know what button to push, and those that want to know what happens when they push the button. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jose wrote in news:lVzbi.3474$bP5.1427
@newssvr19.news.prodigy.net: Is there a good correlation between the appearance of rain in a developing CB and the point at which the storm reaches its peak? I'm familiar with the standard three stage picture of thunderstorm development, and the fact that if significant winds are present a storm can keep building despite the dissipating effect of rain. The context of my question is flying near tall cumulus under which strong rain is falling, but which has not yet developed into a full fledged thunderstorm. It would seem to me that the rain is dissipating the energy of the storm and that the storm is unlikely to continue towering into a thunderstorm (making it safer to skirt closer to). Nope, the rain is increasing it by releasing latent heat. Bertie |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote: Nope, the rain is increasing it by releasing latent heat. Makes sense, yet I'm sure I've seen small storms "rain out." What's happening then? -- Dan T-182T at BFM |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dan Luke" wrote in
: "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote: Nope, the rain is increasing it by releasing latent heat. Makes sense, yet I'm sure I've seen small storms "rain out." What's happening then? Not enough energy present to keep them growing. i.e, not enough moisture, heat or instability. Bertie |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:08:17 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
wrote: Jose wrote in news:lVzbi.3474$bP5.1427 : Is there a good correlation between the appearance of rain in a developing CB and the point at which the storm reaches its peak? I'm familiar with the standard three stage picture of thunderstorm development, and the fact that if significant winds are present a storm can keep building despite the dissipating effect of rain. The context of my question is flying near tall cumulus under which strong rain is falling, but which has not yet developed into a full fledged thunderstorm. It would seem to me that the rain is dissipating the energy of the storm and that the storm is unlikely to continue towering into a thunderstorm (making it safer to skirt closer to). Nope, the rain is increasing it by releasing latent heat. Yup. The change of state from vapor to liquid gives off a lot of energy and from liquid to solid (hail) a LOT more. Some storms as you said in a later post just don't have enough energy available to "grow up", and when a mature thunderstorm dies, it may suddenly lose the strong updrafts that are holding literally hundreds of thousands of tons of water "up there" and it all comes down at once. Bertie |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Roger (K8RI)" wrote:
Yup. The change of state from vapor to liquid gives off a lot of energy and from liquid to solid (hail) a LOT more. It's been a (long) while since I've done this stuff, so I had to look the numbers up. I think you got it backwards -- the vapor to liquid transition (heat of condensation) is more than the liquid to solid (heat of fusion) for water. Heat of condensation: 540 cal/g Heat of fusion: 80 cal/g But, by the time you've got a cloud, hasn't the condensation already happened? I would think there would still be some heat liberated in going from lots of microscopic water droplets to one big raindrop, but probably nothing compared to the heat of condensation. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Naval Air development history | Larry Cauble | Naval Aviation | 0 | October 16th 05 12:29 AM |
Phantom-II development story | Tony Volk | Naval Aviation | 29 | November 15th 04 07:26 PM |
Airship Lists and development update | Andreas Grunewald | General Aviation | 0 | April 9th 04 07:29 PM |
XCSoar Still under development? | Michael Pitoniak | Soaring | 0 | November 30th 03 10:23 PM |
Is Falcon 5.0 in development? | Radeon350 | Simulators | 7 | July 21st 03 03:21 AM |