![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Given the USA's dependence on space based assets for communication, control
as well as surveillance and targeting not to mention what else we are not aware of (black ops), it would seem that the Chinese have robust projects to deny the USA space at a time of its choosing. Recent reports indicate they (Chicoms) are hiding a major part their defense spending, it would appear they have plan. Is it Taiwan or maybe "something" larger? T3 http://www.space.com/news/china_dod_030801.html http://abcnews.go.com/sections/world...nse000306.html |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"T3" wrote in
m: Given the USA's dependence on space based assets for communication, control as well as surveillance and targeting not to mention what else we are not aware of (black ops), it would seem that the Chinese have robust projects to deny the USA space at a time of its choosing. Recent reports indicate they (Chicoms) are hiding a major part their defense spending, it would appear they have plan. Is it Taiwan or maybe "something" larger? T3 http://www.space.com/news/china_dod_030801.html http://abcnews.go.com/sections/world...nse000306.html Well,we know they want Taiwan,the Spratleys and Paracels,and might want a nice oil source like Indonesia or the Phillipines.Not to mention a nice security buffer against foreign interference with their plans. They may have learned a bit from the Japanese expansion of the Pacific. -- Jim Yanik,NRA member remove null to contact me |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Yanik" wrote in message .. . "T3" wrote in m: Given the USA's dependence on space based assets for communication, control as well as surveillance and targeting not to mention what else we are not aware of (black ops), it would seem that the Chinese have robust projects to deny the USA space at a time of its choosing. Recent reports indicate they (Chicoms) are hiding a major part their defense spending, it would appear they have plan. Is it Taiwan or maybe "something" larger? T3 http://www.space.com/news/china_dod_030801.html http://abcnews.go.com/sections/world...nse000306.html Well,we know they want Taiwan,the Spratleys and Paracels,and might want a nice oil source like Indonesia or the Phillipines.Not to mention a nice security buffer against foreign interference with their plans. They may have learned a bit from the Japanese expansion of the Pacific. -- Jim Yanik,NRA member remove null to contact me Exactly, that's what scares me!! I have yet to see a counter from the west. T3 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 02:44:22 GMT, "T3" wrote:
"Jim Yanik" wrote in message . .. "T3" wrote in m: Given the USA's dependence on space based assets for communication, control as well as surveillance and targeting not to mention what else we are not aware of (black ops), it would seem that the Chinese have robust projects to deny the USA space at a time of its choosing. Recent reports indicate they (Chicoms) are hiding a major part their defense spending, it would appear they have plan. Is it Taiwan or maybe "something" larger? http://www.space.com/news/china_dod_030801.html http://abcnews.go.com/sections/world...nse000306.html Well,we know they want Taiwan,the Spratleys and Paracels,and might want a nice oil source like Indonesia or the Phillipines.Not to mention a nice security buffer against foreign interference with their plans. They may have learned a bit from the Japanese expansion of the Pacific. Exactly, that's what scares me!! I have yet to see a counter from the west. A counter to what? The PLAN isn't suddenly going to emerge as a blue water navy carrying out the kind of ops you proposed without a decade of warning (at least) - you can't hide a large warship program from satellites, and you certainly can't hide amphibious ops. Do they have a plan? Almost certainly. Do we need to panic now? absolutely not. Currently they can't seriously challenge the USN - hell the RN could take on the PLAN on and have a good chance of a win if it was more than 200nm from land to eliminate a few thousand of their short range fighters. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Kemp" wrote in message news ![]() | | || | Do they have a plan? Almost certainly. Do we need to panic now? | absolutely not. Currently they can't seriously challenge the USN - | hell the RN could take on the PLAN on and have a good chance of a win | if it was more than 200nm from land to eliminate a few thousand of | their short range fighters. | You could even do it inshore if the fleet was protected by EP-3s on CAP Cheers Dave Kearton |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dave Kearton" wrote in message ...
"Peter Kemp" wrote in message news ![]() | | || | Do they have a plan? Almost certainly. Do we need to panic now? | absolutely not. Currently they can't seriously challenge the USN - | hell the RN could take on the PLAN on and have a good chance of a win | if it was more than 200nm from land to eliminate a few thousand of | their short range fighters. | You could even do it inshore if the fleet was protected by EP-3s on CAP Cheers Dave Kearton This topic should be merged with other topic on China's new DDG PLAN certainly cannot be understand i doubt RN can hold up against PLAN near chinese mainland considering the amount of missile boats and minelayers they have. But that said PLAN can do very little other be defensive force but they spending a lot of money to rectify that. They are building 3 new destroyers order 2 sovremenny for $1.4 billion dollars and 8 Kilo submarines for 2.4 billion. So definetly throwing a lot of money at improving their navy. Also there is massive rivalry going on in E Asia between India, china, S korea and Japan, while current Japan has the best navy in asia only time will tell which country will come out a ahead in the near future. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
IFR Flight Plan question | Snowbird | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | August 13th 04 12:55 AM |
Canadian IFR/VFR Flight Plan | gwengler | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | August 11th 04 03:55 AM |
CAAC in China had approved below 116kg aircraft sold in China without airworthiness cetificate | Luo Zheng | Home Built | 0 | June 27th 04 03:50 AM |
IFR flight plan filing question | Tune2828 | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | July 23rd 03 03:33 AM |
Commander gives Navy airframe plan good review | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | July 8th 03 09:10 PM |