![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In another thread I am in a discussion on radar capability for FAA
"Centers". My recollection is that they typically have no primary radar, thus no capability to paint weather. Someone is telling me they do. Anybody out there have the answer. Maybe some do and some don't, and the ones I used in the past don't. -- Danny Deger NASA offered me $15,000 to take down my web site. Take a look and see why. www.dannydeger.net |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Danny Deger" wrote in
: In another thread I am in a discussion on radar capability for FAA "Centers". My recollection is that they typically have no primary radar, thus no capability to paint weather. Someone is telling me they do. Anybody out there have the answer. Maybe some do and some don't, and the ones I used in the past don't. Centers have responsibility for large areas of airspace. Any radar capability they have beyond their immediate vicinity would be the result of fused results from a number of remote sites. IBM |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ian MacLure" wrote in message
... "Danny Deger" wrote in : In another thread I am in a discussion on radar capability for FAA "Centers". My recollection is that they typically have no primary radar, thus no capability to paint weather. Someone is telling me they do. Anybody out there have the answer. Maybe some do and some don't, and the ones I used in the past don't. Centers have responsibility for large areas of airspace. Any radar capability they have beyond their immediate vicinity would be the result of fused results from a number of remote sites. Then they must have fused results, because everytime I have worked with a Center, they can see my transponder. The question is -- do they have primary radar capability? Danny Deger |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Danny Deger wrote:
Then they must have fused results, because everytime I have worked with a Center, they can see my transponder. The question is -- do they have primary radar capability? Danny Deger This is not a direct answer to your question. Sorry. When I toured Houston Center pre-911 there were Nexrad type weather displays in one corner, at the traffic management/weather specialists area. The individual sectors did not have this display. I remember asking about primary versus secondary and was told there was backup secondary radar, as well as primary capability at the sectors. Also when on a long cross country wth an instructor (whom I will never fly with again) we were in contact with center, trying to punch a front line in IMC. It was either Fr Worth or Houston Center, and the controller had some sort of weather return because my instructor was asking for, and taking vectors through the line. So I want to say yes to your question. But I cant prove it positively. Dave |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bob" wrote in message
... On Sun, 5 Aug 2007 15:43:29 -0500, "Danny Deger" wrote: In another thread I am in a discussion on radar capability for FAA "Centers". My recollection is that they typically have no primary radar, thus no capability to paint weather. Someone is telling me they do. Anybody out there have the answer. Maybe some do and some don't, and the ones I used in the past don't. "FAA Primary En Route Long Range Radar Restructuring Program The FAA currently uses and supports 126 primary en route radar facilities. The FAA is chartered to provide Primary radar services to all federal agencies requiring this data to meet their operational missions." http://www.faa.gov/asd/ia-or/longrangeradar.htm Thanks for the link. I found it very useful. I think my confusion comes from an accident where a friend of mine died because Washington Center lost radar contact when he lost his transponder. He was out over the ocean in a warning area. We were briefed Washington Center had no ability to skin paint. I am starting to realize this probably had to do only with this situation of being over the ocean in a warning area and Centers in general have skin paint capable radars. If anyone is interested in the details of this fatal flight, I put them in my book, "Houston, You Have a Problem" and you can get it for free at www.dannydeger.net Danny Deger |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() -- Danny Deger NASA offered me $15,000 to take down my web site. Take a look and see why. www.dannydeger.net "Dave S" wrote in message ... Danny Deger wrote: Then they must have fused results, because everytime I have worked with a Center, they can see my transponder. The question is -- do they have primary radar capability? Danny Deger This is not a direct answer to your question. Sorry. When I toured Houston Center pre-911 there were Nexrad type weather displays in one corner, at the traffic management/weather specialists area. The individual sectors did not have this display. I remember asking about primary versus secondary and was told there was backup secondary radar, as well as primary capability at the sectors. Also when on a long cross country wth an instructor (whom I will never fly with again) we were in contact with center, trying to punch a front line in IMC. It was either Fr Worth or Houston Center, and the controller had some sort of weather return because my instructor was asking for, and taking vectors through the line. So I want to say yes to your question. But I cant prove it positively. Dave Thanks. This was very useful. Danny Deger |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 5, 3:43 pm, "Danny Deger" wrote:
In another thread I am in a discussion on radar capability for FAA "Centers". My recollection is that they typically have no primary radar, thus no capability to paint weather. Someone is telling me they do. Anybody out there have the answer. Maybe some do and some don't, and the ones I used in the past don't. -- Danny Deger NASA offered me $15,000 to take down my web site. Take a look and see why.www.dannydeger.net Danny. Center Radar is a L Band search APSR-4 with skin paint capability of 1 meter at I think 60 miles...at 100 it is less... These are old radars dating back to the first go at a radar center system. The moderinzation project for the actual radar (not the data display) started in (if memory serves) 1989...the idea was to improve the reciever/transmitter section and split off a feed for digital wx data much as has been done for the ASR-9 and 11...this required a new feed horn for the RX to allow reception of circularly polarized (good for airplane tracking) and linear returns (good for WX)... I know the one at the FAA HQ in OKC has been done (it is a hugh monster) and I think that ATL, HOU and I want to say ABQ centers have had all of their sites modernized... But as it goes everything went over budget and by 2001 they are thinking about not modernizing the system and just going to a secondary (ie transponder system)...then 9/11 happened and that ended all that discussion. A trip to OKC is pretty good. When I was there for safety school I took the ATC tour and part of it is that a knowledgable person takes you "outside" and points out what all the radars (there are a lot of them I counted over 18) do. I had driven up for safety school (and am a amateur radio operator) and had my portable specturm analyser...that was an eye opener. Robert |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
you are asking the wrong question..
"Primary Radar" tuned to detect aircraft "skin paint" is not tuned to detect weather. Consider that if the Primary Radar where tuned to weather.. than a major rain storm or thunder storm would cause radar attenuation and could not detect the "skin paint" behind the weather. There is a move afoot to have NEXRAD displays at the controller stations, but those should not be used to direct an aircraft "between cells", but to know where the less severe weather areas are to move traffic through and avoid areas that aircraft do not like to fly through. B "Danny Deger" wrote in message ... In another thread I am in a discussion on radar capability for FAA "Centers". My recollection is that they typically have no primary radar, thus no capability to paint weather. Someone is telling me they do. Anybody out there have the answer. Maybe some do and some don't, and the ones I used in the past don't. -- Danny Deger NASA offered me $15,000 to take down my web site. Take a look and see why. www.dannydeger.net |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
what was the altitude.. where you below the "radar horizon" for the range
from the antenna? Was the "target aircraft" in a "blind radar area for the altitude" based on a close in obstruction such as earth or building? B "Danny Deger" wrote in message ... "Bob" wrote in message ... On Sun, 5 Aug 2007 15:43:29 -0500, "Danny Deger" wrote: In another thread I am in a discussion on radar capability for FAA "Centers". My recollection is that they typically have no primary radar, thus no capability to paint weather. Someone is telling me they do. Anybody out there have the answer. Maybe some do and some don't, and the ones I used in the past don't. "FAA Primary En Route Long Range Radar Restructuring Program The FAA currently uses and supports 126 primary en route radar facilities. The FAA is chartered to provide Primary radar services to all federal agencies requiring this data to meet their operational missions." http://www.faa.gov/asd/ia-or/longrangeradar.htm Thanks for the link. I found it very useful. I think my confusion comes from an accident where a friend of mine died because Washington Center lost radar contact when he lost his transponder. He was out over the ocean in a warning area. We were briefed Washington Center had no ability to skin paint. I am starting to realize this probably had to do only with this situation of being over the ocean in a warning area and Centers in general have skin paint capable radars. If anyone is interested in the details of this fatal flight, I put them in my book, "Houston, You Have a Problem" and you can get it for free at www.dannydeger.net Danny Deger |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 5, 3:58 pm, "Danny Deger" wrote:
"Bob" wrote in message ... On Sun, 5 Aug 2007 15:43:29 -0500, "Danny Deger" wrote: In another thread I am in a discussion on radar capability for FAA "Centers". My recollection is that they typically have no primary radar, thus no capability to paint weather. Someone is telling me they do. Anybody out there have the answer. Maybe some do and some don't, and the ones I used in the past don't. "FAA Primary En Route Long Range Radar Restructuring Program The FAA currently uses and supports 126 primary en route radar facilities. The FAA is chartered to provide Primary radar services to all federal agencies requiring this data to meet their operational missions." http://www.faa.gov/asd/ia-or/longrangeradar.htm Thanks for the link. I found it very useful. I think my confusion comes from an accident where a friend of mine died because Washington Center lost radar contact when he lost his transponder. He was out over the ocean in a warning area. We were briefed Washington Center had no ability to skin paint. I am starting to realize this probably had to do only with this situation of being over the ocean in a warning area and Centers in general have skin paint capable radars. My understanding of FAA radar is the transponder is just used to ID the aircraft and provide altitude information. A plane with a defective transponder can be seen on radar, but no ID or altitude. The transponder is pinged at 1030MHz, and responds on 1090MHz. I believe the actually locating radar is in a different band. Note the 911 hijackers turned off the transponders, but the planes were still tracked. Someone mentioned secondary surveillance. This is mode-s. It is also on 1030/1090Mhz. However, the reply from the transponder is more detailed. It contains a unique code for each aircraft. The older transponders simply return the squawk code that was assigned by ATC and entered by the pilot. Some mode-s can return airspace and location. http://mit.edu/6.933/www/Fall2000/mode-s/ http://adsb.tc.faa.gov/ If anyone is interested in the details of this fatal flight, I put them in my book, "Houston, You Have a Problem" and you can get it for free atwww.dannydeger.net Danny Deger |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FWD: Article "Logan to get radar to detect ships - Monitoring could improve flow of air traffic" | Jon | Piloting | 0 | April 18th 07 09:22 PM |
FWD: Article "Logan to get radar to detect ships - Monitoring could improve flow of air traffic" | Jon | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | April 18th 07 09:22 PM |
Old polish aircraft TS-8 "Bies" ("Bogy") - for sale | >pk | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | October 16th 06 07:48 AM |
"Are you worried about all those non-green colors on the radar?" | Peter R. | Instrument Flight Rules | 35 | May 26th 06 01:19 AM |