![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"David Moss" wrote in message
.. . In article , writes... You don't send strikers in on their own. That's what EW is for. Did you know that there is a Wild Weasel version of the Super Hornet going into production. (The EA18G "Growler") that will replace the EA6 Prowler and the (now retired) EF111 Raven. Just imagine, a EW platform with 100% in common with the rest of the strike package. Electronic Warfare packs emit radio signals designed to jam or confuse enemy radar. Notice the word "emit". Anything that emits RF can be triangulated using very basic equipment. That's why you separate your Weasels from your strikers. Thats the downside of using EW: you let people know precisely where you are. Generally people leave EW packs Hmmm, yeah, on-board EW kits, yes. I was talking about dedicated EW aircraft. The ones with the really good EW voodoo. turned off unless they have an urgent and immediate need to jam or confuse. An incoming missile is about the only reason to turn it on. Yeah, that's the self-defence EW kit. I'm talking about SEAD-type EW platforms like the EA-18F Growler. That still have to find their targets to kill them. F18F's are stealthier than Su30's. But not as stealthy as 40 year old F111s. An FA18 is less observable than a barn-door RCS F111? Since when? Or the SU24 for that matter. I think you made a typo. Or did you actually mean the F111ski? The Russians plan to replace their SU24s with SU34s about the same time our F111s stop flying. They are currently in low number production. Su24? The Cold War swing-wing ground attack aircraft? The F111ski? The SU34, which is not currently an option for anyone but Russia, is a true F111 replacement. It is a long range fighter bomber that allegedly has a semi stealthy shape Doubtful. It doesn't exhibit much of the faceting you normally see on a low RCS airframe. and low level terrain following capability. You do realise that terrain following is a good ground-based radar counter measure, but not so good against a decent look-down radar on say.... Wedgetail? -- "Don't believe everything you think". |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2 Hornets | Glenn[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 2 | September 27th 07 07:31 AM |
3 Hornets | Glenn[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | September 24th 07 10:32 AM |
5 RAAF Hornets | Glenn[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | April 5th 07 12:57 PM |
Hornets rolling | Glenn[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | April 2nd 07 11:58 AM |
Navy decides to split Super Hornets between Beach and N.C. | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | July 18th 03 09:30 PM |