![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Have you come across something that's arcane, anachronistic or just plain useless in your travels through the regs? Well, the FAA says it wants to know about it. The agency has issued a Review of Existing Regulations that invites anyone with a beef about how the law of the air is now set to drop them a line. "Getting public comments is a necessary element of our effort to make our regulations more effective and less burdensome," the agency claims in the document. It's asking that you list the top three aggravations in descending order for it to consider. The FAA has to do this under Executive Order 12866 and provides a long list of efforts toward that end. "Our goal is to identify regulations that impose undue regulatory burden; are no longer necessary; or overlay, duplicate, or conflict with other Federal regulations," the document says. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
US Rules Poll and Rules Committee Election | Ken Sorenson | Soaring | 0 | December 1st 06 01:36 AM |
US Rules Committee Election and Rules Poll | Ken Sorenson | Soaring | 1 | September 27th 05 10:52 PM |
Eliminating Opening Screen | Blue | Simulators | 7 | February 8th 04 07:02 PM |
FLASH! U.S.A. Rules Committee to Address Rules Complexity? | SoarPoint | Soaring | 1 | February 3rd 04 02:36 AM |
New SRA Site - New 2003 Rules Minutes and 2004 Rules Summary | Ken Kochanski | Soaring | 0 | December 17th 03 03:38 AM |