![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lots of posters here have fun bashing MX, but I have to say that one of the
more enjoyable experiences I've had lately was sitting in the family room, in front of the PC. I am working on my instrument ticket. Ove the years I have collected the CH yoke and footpedals. I have downloaded a flight model and graphics for my Sundowner. I was looking out the window at the snow falling, and I set the sim to real world weather. Damn if the screen didn't look exactly like the weather outside, and I was once again looking at my panel. The ATC simulation wasn't bad either, and off I went down the "runway." I got vectored around pretty much the same as when I fly under the hood. I thought that was absolutely fantastic, and all for about a nickel's worth of electricity. No instructor or safety pilot needed. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "LWG" wrote in message . .. Lots of posters here have fun bashing MX, but I have to say that one of the more enjoyable experiences I've had lately was sitting in the family room, in front of the PC. I am working on my instrument ticket. Ove the years I have collected the CH yoke and footpedals. I have downloaded a flight model and graphics for my Sundowner. I was looking out the window at the snow falling, and I set the sim to real world weather. Damn if the screen didn't look exactly like the weather outside, and I was once again looking at my panel. The ATC simulation wasn't bad either, and off I went down the "runway." I got vectored around pretty much the same as when I fly under the hood. I thought that was absolutely fantastic, and all for about a nickel's worth of electricity. No instructor or safety pilot needed. Yep, but it wasn't flying, which is the whole point, right? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
LWG wrote:
Lots of posters here have fun bashing MX, but I have to say that one of the more enjoyable experiences I've had lately was sitting in the family room, in front of the PC. I am working on my instrument ticket. Ove the years I have collected the CH yoke and footpedals. I have downloaded a flight model and graphics for my Sundowner. I was looking out the window at the snow falling, and I set the sim to real world weather. Damn if the screen didn't look exactly like the weather outside, and I was once again looking at my panel. The ATC simulation wasn't bad either, and off I went down the "runway." I got vectored around pretty much the same as when I fly under the hood. I thought that was absolutely fantastic, and all for about a nickel's worth of electricity. No instructor or safety pilot needed. Just do me a favor will you please? Don't go out and try to fly IFR with all that "no instructor or safety pilot needed" simulator time in your log book without getting some of that "instructor and safety pilot needed" stuff as well. Don't EVER be misled into believing that what you can do and what you see on MSFS will replace the actual experience needed to safely fly the airplane. It's nice to enjoy MSFS, and God only knows I have even reviewed it for its role in real world aviation and found it has many a useful purpose, but MSFS will NEVER replace actual flight instruction and produce a safe pilot, especially a safe instrument pilot. -- Dudley Henriques CFI/MVP2007 MSFS |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 19:17:38 -0500, LWG wrote:
Lots of posters here have fun bashing MX It important to not hate PC flight simulators just because of MX. We can argue over their value as training tools, but I bet most would agree that as entertainment, they can be a hell of a lot of fun. -- Dallas |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
LWG writes:
Lots of posters here have fun bashing MX, but I have to say that one of the more enjoyable experiences I've had lately was sitting in the family room, in front of the PC. I am working on my instrument ticket. Ove the years I have collected the CH yoke and footpedals. I have downloaded a flight model and graphics for my Sundowner. I was looking out the window at the snow falling, and I set the sim to real world weather. Damn if the screen didn't look exactly like the weather outside, and I was once again looking at my panel. The ATC simulation wasn't bad either, and off I went down the "runway." I got vectored around pretty much the same as when I fly under the hood. I thought that was absolutely fantastic, and all for about a nickel's worth of electricity. No instructor or safety pilot needed. That's only the tip of the iceberg. If you'd like to enjoy simming even more, consider: 1. Getting an add-on payware aircraft that matches whatever you enjoy flying in real life (or whatever you'd like to fly in real life). Companies like Dreamfleet, PMDG, and Level-D offer hyperrealistic simulations of a great many large and small aircraft that are so accurate that it's almost like flying a brand-new (and superior) simulator. 2. Use ActiveSky for weather. The simulations are so accurate that it's hard to distinguish them from real life. 3. Join VATSIM, and you can fly on a network with other human pilots and human air traffic controllers, with real ATC instead of the computer-generated kind (which isn't bad, but is very inflexible and predictable). Desktop simulation is especially nice for IFR, for obvious reasons, and it can give you useful practice in IFR and in navigation techniques. Using add-ons and VATSIM allows you to fly commercial routes with terminal procedures (SIDs and STARs and IAPs) and live ATC support, which the default sim does not. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kyle Boatright writes:
Yep, but it wasn't flying, which is the whole point, right? For some people, the differences between flying a real airplane and flying a simulated airplane simply are not that important, which is why they enjoy simming. Even for people who prefer flying a real airplane, simulation is close enough to the real thing and so incredibly inexpensive that it doesn't make sense to refuse to try it. In just online sim flying alone I have around 900 hours of time in the air, for less cost than a single hour in a tiny tin can airplane would cost in real life (and disregarding the huge cost of just getting a license for a real-world aircraft). |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dudley Henriques writes:
Just do me a favor will you please? Don't go out and try to fly IFR with all that "no instructor or safety pilot needed" simulator time in your log book without getting some of that "instructor and safety pilot needed" stuff as well. I didn't see any mention of doing anything like that. Do you think he is stupid? Don't EVER be misled into believing that what you can do and what you see on MSFS will replace the actual experience needed to safely fly the airplane. See above. Do you assume that people who fly simulators are stupid? It's nice to enjoy MSFS, and God only knows I have even reviewed it for its role in real world aviation and found it has many a useful purpose, but MSFS will NEVER replace actual flight instruction and produce a safe pilot, especially a safe instrument pilot. Never is a long time, although I'll agree for MSFS in its current state and particularly in its default state. But you must keep in mind that you can sim as a substitate for flying a real plane, or you can sim as a replacement for flying a real plane, depending on what part of flying you enjoy. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"LWG" wrote in message
. .. Lots of posters here have fun bashing MX, but I have to say that one of the more enjoyable experiences I've had lately was sitting in the family room, in front of the PC. I am working on my instrument ticket. Ove the years I have collected the CH yoke and footpedals. I have downloaded a flight model and graphics for my Sundowner. I was looking out the window at the snow falling, and I set the sim to real world weather. Damn if the screen didn't look exactly like the weather outside, and I was once again looking at my panel. The ATC simulation wasn't bad either, and off I went down the "runway." I got vectored around pretty much the same as when I fly under the hood. I thought that was absolutely fantastic, and all for about a nickel's worth of electricity. No instructor or safety pilot needed. How dare you! Enjoyment! And at this time of year! Peter a/k/a Ebby (Scrooge) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
..
"Dallas" wrote in message ... ... We can argue over their value as training tools, but I bet most would agree that as entertainment, they can be a hell of a lot of fun. I play with Condor Soaring http://www.condorsoaring.com/ -- Geoff The Sea Hawk at Wow Way d0t Com remove spaces and make the obvious substitutions to reply by mail When immigration is outlawed, only outlaws will immigrate |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
news ![]() Dudley Henriques writes: Just do me a favor will you please? Don't go out and try to fly IFR with all that "no instructor or safety pilot needed" simulator time in your log book without getting some of that "instructor and safety pilot needed" stuff as well. I didn't see any mention of doing anything like that. Do you think he is stupid? You don't fly. You have no idea what you;re talking about. You have no business posting on this subject. Bertie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Frustrated with finding flight sims | [email protected] | Simulators | 8 | March 14th 05 09:33 PM |
Av mags and sims.... | Don Parker | Simulators | 7 | August 11th 03 05:48 PM |
A few thoughts on Flight Sims | Don Parker | Simulators | 6 | August 1st 03 06:19 PM |
A few questions about Flight Sims and equipment | Dave Pearson | Simulators | 0 | July 29th 03 09:05 AM |