![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Soaring pilots who fly in America's Great Basin, especially from Ely
and Parowan, might be interested in commenting on a proposal from the US Air Force to prepare an environmental impact statement that would look at their proposed change in operations in the Utah Test and Training Range and expand use of the White Elk MOA in eastern Nevada. This is our opportunity to ask the Air Force to consider soaring operations in their environmental impact statement. You can find information on the proposal at: http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2...7/E7-23137.htm The AOPA opposes this proposal on the part of the Air Force. You can find the AOPA's take on this at: http://www.aopa.org/advocacy/article...080103moa.html The SSA has commented on this. I am attaching below some thoughts that come from the SSA letter to the Air Force. (This is not the full text of the letter.) Please use the address shown in this letter for your comment, and please remember your letter must be postmarked January 7th (Monday) in order to be considered. Length is not important - personal examples are. Your comment will have particular relevance to the Air Force if you can point to examples of how the change in this MOA will affect your operations or affect safe operations there. Please feel free to append any record you have of flights you have made in the Great Basin. Thank you for your effort to sensitize the Air Force to the impact of this proposal on soaring operations. Regards, Fred LaSor Ms. Sheryl Parker HQ ACC/A7PP 129 Andrews Street, Suite 102 Langley AFB, VA 23665-2769 Dear Ms. Parker: This comment responds to the Air Force proposal for an environmental impact statement regarding the White Elk MOA in Nevada. I believe the proposal as a significant danger to VFR sailplane pilots in the American Great Basin. You may not be aware of the volume of sailplane activity and the inherent risk by the proposed Air Force operations. White Elk proposes to use chaff, flares and supersonic flight as low as 14,000 msl in the described boundaries. These flights are described as training operations. Flight training involves crew supervision in the cockpit and focuses on systems-oriented target acquisition from panel display or HUD information. This is not an operation that prioritizes or easily adapts to visual external target acquisition (See and Avoid practices). Sailplane operations in this area currently extend up to 17,500 msl, at flight cruising speeds of typically up to 145 knots indicated, which yield true airspeeds up to 170 knots at altitude. The sailplanes are typically NOT transponder equipped and would be difficult for ATC to identify for traffic advisories to military aircraft. It is customary for sailplanes to communicate air-to-ground with their retrieve crew, base of operations, or other sailplane pilots for PIREPs on flight conditions, rather than with ATC. In this desolate region, this is a safety of flight issue to limit the occasions of search and rescue from desert landings. White Elk has altered its proposal in response to Elko County Airport's concerns for sufficient altitude for traffic above terrain. This concentrates military traffic into the layer most likely to contain sailplane traffic. Sailplane pilots strive to achieve maximum altitude to extend distance flights, while remaining below Flight Levels. At described flight altitudes and speeds, a head-on sailplane target at 30 seconds prior to midair impact is visually two thousandths of an inch in size. Closing speed of 700 knots AF and 170 knots civilian is 870 knots, equaling 14.5 nautical miles per minute. Mixing these operations is a recipe for disaster. Sailplanes are based out of Ely in summer months, and several regional and national contests have been flown from Ely and Parowan airports, and use the White Elk area daily from May to late September. Visitors arrive in the Great Basin from across the US and around the world to use this recreational area, free of most airliner and general aviation traffic. Some 2007 Sailplane flights in the Great Basin Parowan, UT 555 flights 244,737 km 132,156 nm distance flown Ely, NV 89 flights 70,589 km 38,117 nm distance flown Tonopah, NV 97 flights 34,456 km 18,606 nm distance flown Minden , NV 146 flights 58,905 km 31,808 nm distance flown These are only the voluntarily recorded flights which used the named launch points, and are not inclusive of all sailplane flights made in or through the state of Nevada. For flight safety concerns, I strongly object to the concept of flares, chaff and supersonic flight that may occur not within the confines of Restricted or positively controlled airspace. The White Elk proposal as known to us raises the spectre of loss of life for Air Force flight crews and general aviation soaring pilots. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
US Military now wants more northern NY airspace to expand those MOAs | Peter R. | Piloting | 7 | June 14th 07 01:30 PM |
Wichita Airspace Question and overlapping airspace | Owen[_4_] | Piloting | 1 | February 14th 07 09:35 PM |
How the expand the hobby? | Lucas | Simulators | 4 | April 4th 05 06:06 PM |
Expand the hobby? | Lucas | Simulators | 0 | March 24th 05 06:37 PM |
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk | Jehad Internet | Military Aviation | 0 | February 7th 04 04:24 AM |