![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This sort of follows up on the future of soaring thread, but is more
focused on the sailplane design aspect. Ok.....here is the scenario: the powers that be have decided that once again the soaring community needs a sailplane that represents Joe Sailplane Pilot. Joe sailplane pilot wants a sailplane that will get him where he wants to go, but on a budget. Joe's a smart guy..............he knows a thing or two about sailplanes; having spent considerable time poking and prodding their various bits and pieces. He decides he wants a composite ship, now he want's......................what???? Here is where you fill in the blanks.............if for no other reason than to whack away at the keyboard.....or not! Cheers, Brad |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 4, 11:41*am, Brad wrote:
This sort of follows up on the future of soaring thread, but is more focused on the sailplane design aspect. Ok.....here is the scenario: the powers that be have decided that once again the soaring community needs a sailplane that represents Joe Sailplane Pilot. Joe sailplane pilot wants a sailplane that will get him where he wants to go, but on a budget. Joe's a smart guy..............he knows a thing or two about sailplanes; having spent considerable time poking and prodding their various bits and pieces. He decides he wants a composite ship, now he want's......................what???? Here is where you fill in the blanks.............if for no other reason than to whack away at the keyboard.....or not! Cheers, Brad Performance is the obvious one. Other than that, I would say ease of rigging, cockpit comfort, and prototypical looks. It's gotta look cool! ![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brad wrote:
This sort of follows up on the future of soaring thread, but is more focused on the sailplane design aspect. Ok.....here is the scenario: the powers that be have decided that once again the soaring community needs a sailplane that represents Joe Sailplane Pilot. Joe sailplane pilot wants a sailplane that will get him where he wants to go, but on a budget. Joe's a smart guy..............he knows a thing or two about sailplanes; having spent considerable time poking and prodding their various bits and pieces. He decides he wants a composite ship, now he want's......................what???? Here is where you fill in the blanks.............if for no other reason than to whack away at the keyboard.....or not! It would be shaped like this: $24,999 :-) Honestly, if it's a composite ship, even with fixed gear, mid 30s:1 performance or better should be a reasonable expectation. New, same performance, and just a bit more $$ than the Mosquito I sold a couple years ago? Easy. Shawn |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
$24,999
:-) Honestly, if it's a composite ship, even with fixed gear, mid 30s:1 performance or better should be a reasonable expectation. New, same performance, and just a bit more $$ than the Mosquito I sold a couple years ago? *Easy. I like the way you think...................I have some ideas for shapes rattling around in my head. Brad |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brad wrote:
This sort of follows up on the future of soaring thread, but is more focused on the sailplane design aspect. Ok.....here is the scenario: the powers that be have decided that once again the soaring community needs a sailplane that represents Joe Sailplane Pilot. Joe sailplane pilot wants a sailplane that will get him where he wants to go, but on a budget. Joe's a smart guy..............he knows a thing or two about sailplanes; having spent considerable time poking and prodding their various bits and pieces. He decides he wants a composite ship, now he want's......................what???? Here is where you fill in the blanks.............if for no other reason than to whack away at the keyboard.....or not! Cheers, Brad Start with perhaps an obvious observation. If the end result doesn't look kinda like something that's already popular (Discus, LS-4, ASWG-XX, etc.) then it's not likely to be as popular as one would hope. Consider Genesis and PW-5. They are good gliders, but the odd shape sways people away from them. With that said... Gotta have retractable gear. I'd suggest 40/1 is a minimum target, mid 30's is not going to sway people away from the number of ships that already exceed that. Be able to accomodate most pilots. Pilot comfort w/ chute is a must. Easy rigging and automatic hookups No flaps Have room in the fuse for future model expansion to include a sustainer at least and a small fixed tank for gas. No gel coat would be a huge plus, particularly for the harsher climates. Standard control system layout (no parallelogram stick) Nose and CG release options No nasty handling characteristics. Sprung gear and a good brake Tilt up panel (at least as an option) Room for 2+ batteries. Plenty of ventilation |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gary Emerson wrote:
snip Standard control system layout (no parallelogram stick) I agree with most of what you posted (although if performance is OK w/out retract, i.e. near 40:1, I would say save the bucks/complication) But why no parallelogram stick? I really appreciated it in my Skeeter in rough air. Shawn |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Shawn wrote:
Gary Emerson wrote: snip Standard control system layout (no parallelogram stick) I agree with most of what you posted (although if performance is OK w/out retract, i.e. near 40:1, I would say save the bucks/complication) But why no parallelogram stick? I really appreciated it in my Skeeter in rough air. Shawn only because it's not "typical" it's a marketing issue, not an issue with the viability of the design. most of the glass ships out of germany save some grob 102 club's are retract - besides, I think the performance hit for fixed gear will be significant - include gear warning switches as standard... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 4, 8:53*am, (Doug Hoffman) wrote:
Sounds like an HP-24. *Except the flaps. And we are planning an unflapped version, our molds are based on that provision. Thanks, Bob K. http://www.hpaircraft.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Standard control system layout (no parallelogram stick)
Excuse my ignorance... what is a parallelogram stick? Bartek |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
brtlmj wrote:
Standard control system layout (no parallelogram stick) Excuse my ignorance... what is a parallelogram stick? Bartek The standard configuration has the stick pivoting forward and aft as well as side to side. The parallelogram stick SLIDES forward and aft, but pivots side to side. Some people really like it, but it's a minor design by numbers. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Glider art | Mal | Soaring | 2 | December 13th 06 06:54 PM |
Glider Model - Blaue Maus- 1922 Wasserkuppe Glider | [email protected] | Soaring | 5 | November 19th 06 11:08 PM |
shipping glider to NZ-advice on securing glider in trailer | November Bravo | Soaring | 6 | November 1st 06 02:05 PM |
Sea Glider | OscarCVox | Soaring | 8 | July 12th 04 12:08 AM |
Calculating CL for various wing shapes | ian .at.bendigo | Home Built | 0 | August 28th 03 12:47 PM |