![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
While watching a lot of landing videos and whatnot, I hear "minimums"
called out as an aircraft approaches its landing field. From what I've been told, "minimums" indicates the decision as to whether or not the field is in sight, correct? so if minimums are not met, go around? Am I right in assuming this? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brian wrote in news:6818594d-f834-40c6-bd59-
: While watching a lot of landing videos and whatnot, I hear "minimums" called out as an aircraft approaches its landing field. From what I've been told, "minimums" indicates the decision as to whether or not the field is in sight, correct? so if minimums are not met, go around? Am I right in assuming this? Correct on all points. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 9, 3:01*pm, Brian wrote:
While watching a lot of landing videos and whatnot, I hear "minimums" called out as an aircraft approaches its landing field. Brian, who is calling "minimums" ? This is typically done on a two pilot crew when the PM makes an "Appoaching Minimums" and "Minimums" callouts. On newer planes this is done automatically according to where the minimums bug is set (Usually referenced to RA). From what I've been told, "minimums" indicates the decision as to whether or not the field is in sight, correct? The term "Minimums" in this case refers to the DH or DA (Depending on the type of approach). The runway environment must be insight by the time a pilot reaches minimums (Which is the MAP on many approaches). so if minimums are not met, go around? Am I right in assuming this? For part 91 ops, you only need to have the required inflight visibility. Frank |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "F. Baum" wrote in message ... On Jan 9, 3:01 pm, Brian wrote: While watching a lot of landing videos and whatnot, I hear "minimums" called out as an aircraft approaches its landing field. Brian, who is calling "minimums" ? This is typically done on a two pilot crew when the PM makes an "Appoaching Minimums" and "Minimums" callouts. On newer planes this is done automatically according to where the minimums bug is set (Usually referenced to RA). From what I've been told, "minimums" indicates the decision as to whether or not the field is in sight, correct? The term "Minimums" in this case refers to the DH or DA (Depending on the type of approach). The runway environment must be insight by the time a pilot reaches minimums (Which is the MAP on many approaches). so if minimums are not met, go around? Am I right in assuming this? For part 91 ops, you only need to have the required inflight visibility. Frank Nope Fjuckwit Bertie |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"bertie_the_bunyip" wrote in
: "F. Baum" wrote in message news:7998221d-0b08-442e-8cea-1f2ab9a7b772 @c4g2000hsg.googlegroups.com... On Jan 9, 3:01 pm, Brian wrote: While watching a lot of landing videos and whatnot, I hear "minimums" called out as an aircraft approaches its landing field. Brian, who is calling "minimums" ? This is typically done on a two pilot crew when the PM makes an "Appoaching Minimums" and "Minimums" callouts. On newer planes this is done automatically according to where the minimums bug is set (Usually referenced to RA). From what I've been told, "minimums" indicates the decision as to whether or not the field is in sight, correct? The term "Minimums" in this case refers to the DH or DA (Depending on the type of approach). The runway environment must be insight by the time a pilot reaches minimums (Which is the MAP on many approaches). so if minimums are not met, go around? Am I right in assuming this? For part 91 ops, you only need to have the required inflight visibility. Frank Nope Fjuckwit Bertie Whoowh! Hi! Spelled Fjukkwit BTW. Do you know where I left my socks? I can't find them anywhere. Bertie also |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 10, 7:20*am, "F. Baum" wrote:
On Jan 9, 3:01*pm, Brian wrote: While watching a lot of landing videos and whatnot, I hear "minimums" called out as an aircraft approaches its landing field. Brian, who is calling "minimums" ? This is typically done on a two pilot crew when the PM makes an "Appoaching Minimums" and "Minimums" callouts. On newer planes this is done automatically according to where the minimums bug is set (Usually referenced to RA). The newer Boeings may call "minimums" from the approach set in the FMS. -Robert |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 10, 9:53*am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in news:e59d55d7-f173-4703-956b- : On Jan 10, 7:20*am, "F. Baum" wrote: On Jan 9, 3:01*pm, Brian wrote: While watching a lot of landing videos and whatnot, I hear "minimums" called out as an aircraft approaches its landing field. Brian, who is calling "minimums" ? This is typically done on a two pilot crew when the PM makes an "Appoaching Minimums" and "Minimums" callouts. On newer planes this is done automatically according to where the minimums bug is set (Usually referenced to RA). The newer Boeings may call "minimums" from the approach set in the FMS. Nope,. they call it off the rad alt. Is it always 200 feet or is it based on the approach though? -Robert |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in
: On Jan 10, 9:53*am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote: "Robert M. Gary" wrote in news:e59d55d7-f173-4703-956b- : On Jan 10, 7:20*am, "F. Baum" wrote: On Jan 9, 3:01*pm, Brian wrote: While watching a lot of landing videos and whatnot, I hear "minimums" called out as an aircraft approaches its landing field. Brian, who is calling "minimums" ? This is typically done on a two pilot crew when the PM makes an "Appoaching Minimums" and "Minimums" callouts. On newer planes this is done automatically according to where the minimums bug is set (Usually referenced to RA). The newer Boeings may call "minimums" from the approach set in the FMS. Nope,. they call it off the rad alt. Is it always 200 feet or is it based on the approach though? You set it to the DH. It's usually used for Cat II or III aproaches, Yosemite Sam. You can set it to any rad alt height you like up to as high as it will go. Our's goes from-20 ( we set it to minus if there is no DH at all, like on a Cat IIIB) or to whatever it is. Could be 15 feet, 50 feet, 100 feet, whatever is specified for the approach. If the WX isn't really bad, we don't set it at all, but some airplanes set it as a matter of course. Bertie |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 07:20:40 -0800 (PST), "F. Baum"
wrote: On Jan 9, 3:01*pm, Brian wrote: While watching a lot of landing videos and whatnot, I hear "minimums" called out as an aircraft approaches its landing field. Brian, who is calling "minimums" ? This is typically done on a two pilot crew when the PM makes an "Appoaching Minimums" and "Minimums" callouts. On newer planes this is done automatically according to where the minimums bug is set (Usually referenced to RA). Or by certain altitude alerters in some autopilots, I can get an alert from the 66X. From what I've been told, "minimums" indicates the decision as to whether or not the field is in sight, correct? The term "Minimums" in this case refers to the DH or DA (Depending on the type of approach). The runway environment must be insight by the time a pilot reaches minimums (Which is the MAP on many approaches). so if minimums are not met, go around? Am I right in assuming this? For part 91 ops, you only need to have the required inflight visibility. Don't you have to have ceiling and visibility, or at least the laundry list from 91.175(c)(3)(i) to proceed to 100' ATDZE? I'm thinking airport in a valley with fog yet you're at the DH and still above the layer. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CAT IIIC minimums | Andrey Serbinenko | Instrument Flight Rules | 26 | August 7th 06 08:56 PM |
First approach to minimums | Steven Barnes | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | October 21st 05 07:47 PM |
descent below minimums | hsm | Instrument Flight Rules | 82 | January 11th 05 06:33 PM |
Personal VFR Minimums | Neil Bratney | Piloting | 6 | September 2nd 04 08:32 AM |
CAT II Minimums on a CAT I Approach | Giwi | Instrument Flight Rules | 11 | July 24th 03 07:46 AM |