|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
January 20th 08, 02:59 AM
posted to rec.aviation.piloting,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.disasters.aviation,alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk
|
|||
|
|||
777 again.
Eeyore wrote in
: john bates wrote: "David T. Ashley" wrote If this is true, and if all the control systems failed, it may very well be that the flying pilot had only rudder control but didn't realize it. Using the rudder will also affect the aircraft bank angle, as it causes the outside wing to generate more lift. I agree The control systems DIDN'T fail and one of the eyewitnesses did say that at approx half a mile away a wing went down and soon corrected to level flight, he said 40 degrees which is a lot And this is a good example of why so-called eyewitnesses aren't given too much credibility by accident investigators. Now if YOU were there, eh? Bwawhawhahhwhahwhahwhahwhahwhahhw! Bertie 
|
|
#2
January 20th 08, 03:16 AM
posted to rec.aviation.piloting,alt.disasters.aviation
|
|||
|
|||
|
777 again.
Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Eeyore wrote in john bates wrote: and one of the eyewitnesses did say that at approx half a mile away a wing went down and soon corrected to level flight, he said 40 degrees which is a lot And this is a good example of why so-called eyewitnesses aren't given too much credibility by accident investigators. Now if YOU were there, eh? Bwawhawhahhwhahwhahwhahwhahwhahhw! You of all people should know how ridiculous the idea of a 40 degree bank at less then 600 feet with no power is ! Besides this is claimed to be a video of it on finals. http://youtube.com/watch?v=FNJPR-z4SgM Graham
|
|
#3
January 20th 08, 03:18 AM
posted to rec.aviation.piloting,alt.disasters.aviation
|
|||
|
|||
|
777 again.
Eeyore wrote in
: Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Eeyore wrote in john bates wrote: and one of the eyewitnesses did say that at approx half a mile away a wing went down and soon corrected to level flight, he said 40 degrees which is a lot And this is a good example of why so-called eyewitnesses aren't given too much credibility by accident investigators. Now if YOU were there, eh? Bwawhawhahhwhahwhahwhahwhahwhahhw! You of all people should know how ridiculous the idea of a 40 degree bank at less then 600 feet with no power is ! I know how to fly and you don't. But wait, you claimed i wasn;t a pilot. Well, which is it fjukkktard? Besides this is claimed to be a video of it on finals. http://youtube.com/watch?v=FNJPRz4SgM And you said there ws no video Bertie
|
|
#4
January 20th 08, 06:08 AM
posted to rec.aviation.piloting,alt.disasters.aviation
|
|||
|
|||
|
777 again.
Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Eeyore wrote in Besides this is claimed to be a video of it on finals. http://youtube.com/watch?v=FNJPRz4SgM And you said there ws no video I said there was no video of the CRASH (as it happened). Graham
|
|
#5
January 20th 08, 09:30 AM
posted to rec.aviation.piloting,alt.disasters.aviation,alt.usenet.kooks
|
|||
|
|||
|
777 again.
Eeyore wrote in
: Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Eeyore wrote in Besides this is claimed to be a video of it on finals. http://youtube.com/watch?v=FNJPRz4SgM And you said there ws no video I said there was no video of the CRASH (as it happened). Aww, widdle planespotter must have been so disappointed. Bertie
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
