![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How long does it take to deploy a new design now?
Not just approve it, Not just build a few and test them, but get them into the field and operational squadron operations? The F22 has been going on how many years now? And how about the F35? When do you think we will see operational front line squadrons of either? Not paper dead lines and wishful thinking. Real deployment. And the issues of COTs seems to be an interesting topic. When a system is designed, it can be 3 or 4 generations of CPU processor old by the time its really built. With such long gestation times, what's the solution? A pilots home laptop may have more computing power than many systems in his aircraft. It used to be military and space electronics technology drove the consumer side. Now, its the other way around. Strange times we live in. Bob -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How long does it take to deploy a new design now?
Not just approve it, Not just build a few and test them, but get them into the field and operational squadron operations? B-2 began in mid 70s and was deployed initially in 1993, hit full ompliment in 1999 or so. F-22 was early 80s and is just now deploying operationally. 20 years is probably a good number these days. The F22 has been going on how many years now? And how about the F35? When do you think we will see operational front line squadrons of either? Maybe 2012 for JSF and 2006 for F-22? dead lines and wishful thinking. Real deployment. And the issues of COTs seems to be an interesting topic. When a system is designed, it can be 3 or 4 generations of CPU processor old by the time its really built. With such long gestation times, what's the solution? Buy out critical items at the end of production and hope the supply never runs out, at least not until the avionics can be upgraded. Buy from "junkies", ie electronic salvage firms that know DoD will need certain parts, buy them for pennies on the dollar and sell them to DoD for dollars on the penny. A pilots home laptop may have more computing power than many systems in his aircraft. May? How many 80186 processors does it take to equal a single 1 gig Pentium 4? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Smartace11" wrote in message ... Buy out critical items at the end of production and hope the supply never runs out, at least not until the avionics can be upgraded. Buy from "junkies", ie electronic salvage firms that know DoD will need certain parts, buy them for pennies on the dollar and sell them to DoD for dollars on the penny. Exactly. Basically what's done is, if there's a risk of obsolescense then the manufacturer has to prove they can supply spares for a known number of years, typically up to the next forseeable major update. There are many systems flying now that contain processors that have been out of production for years. (Believe it or not there are systems that are waiting to be fitted to aircraft not due to enter service for years that already contain obsolete components!) Companies often scour the world for long-lost stocks of obsolete processors, etc. when maintenance becomes a problem. Si |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Simon Robbins wrote: "Smartace11" wrote in message ... Buy out critical items at the end of production and hope the supply never runs out, at least not until the avionics can be upgraded. Buy from "junkies", ie electronic salvage firms that know DoD will need certain parts, buy them for pennies on the dollar and sell them to DoD for dollars on the penny. Exactly. Basically what's done is, if there's a risk of obsolescense then the manufacturer has to prove they can supply spares for a known number of years, typically up to the next forseeable major update. There are many systems flying now that contain processors that have been out of production for years. (Believe it or not there are systems that are waiting to be fitted to aircraft not due to enter service for years that already contain obsolete components!) Companies often scour the world for long-lost stocks of obsolete processors, etc. when maintenance becomes a problem. Si Cots (commercial off the shelf technology) is a two edges sword. It used to be the military stuff was custom built at very high (and expensive) spec ratings. Now with commercial computer and processor development running rampant, the consumer side drives the market. Yea, it makes a new product have a higher performance levels than a older custom design could in many instances. But, it also makes the obselecense issue much more of a problem.. I think if you asked Intel to whip up a few thousand 8080's they would laugh at you and show you the door. Even if the government asked. Makes me also wonder about the new generation of software military radios that are essentially more computer than conventional radio. I also wonder what the russians ar doing these days for computer chips. I think i remember them cloning some early CPU's. I cannot see them cloning a P4 level chip. What chips are the russians using these days? Is there any export restrictions still on high level CPU's to the russians? even if there was, it probably is not too big a deal to transship around the problem. BOB -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Simon Robbins" wrote in message ... "Smartace11" wrote in message ... Buy out critical items at the end of production and hope the supply never runs out, at least not until the avionics can be upgraded. Buy from "junkies", ie electronic salvage firms that know DoD will need certain parts, buy them for pennies on the dollar and sell them to DoD for dollars on the penny. Exactly. Basically what's done is, if there's a risk of obsolescense then the manufacturer has to prove they can supply spares for a known number of years, typically up to the next forseeable major update. There are many systems flying now that contain processors that have been out of production for years. (Believe it or not there are systems that are waiting to be fitted to aircraft not due to enter service for years that already contain obsolete components!) Companies often scour the world for long-lost stocks of obsolete processors, etc. when maintenance becomes a problem. Si Like NASA and the Space Shuttle electronics? Nick |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ultralight Club Bylaws - Warning Long Post | MrHabilis | Home Built | 0 | June 11th 04 05:07 PM |
Flight test update - long | nauga | Home Built | 1 | June 5th 04 03:09 AM |
SWRFI Pirep.. (long) | Dave S | Home Built | 20 | May 21st 04 03:02 PM |
IFR Long X/C and the Specter of Expectations | David B. Cole | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | February 24th 04 07:51 PM |
Long Range Spitfires??? | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 3 | September 9th 03 10:05 PM |