![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm wiring the electrical system in my Glasair 3, and would like to
know how most builders wire the alternator. It seems every diagram I get from Bob Nuckolls shows the alternator supply wire (B) connecting to the input side of the starter contactor. But the wiring diagrams from B&C show the B wire going directly to the supply or main bus through a circuit breaker of appropriate amps. The main difference I see is with Nuckolls method, the alternator has to send it's current through the battery contactor. Where as the B&C diagram bypasses it and goes directly to the main bus. Which is better? Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services ---------------------------------------------------------- ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY ** ---------------------------------------------------------- http://www.usenet.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 18, 12:08 pm, Sliker wrote:
I'm wiring the electrical system in my Glasair 3, and would like to know how most builders wire the alternator. It seems every diagram I get from Bob Nuckolls shows the alternator supply wire (B) connecting to the input side of the starter contactor. But the wiring diagrams from B&C show the B wire going directly to the supply or main bus through a circuit breaker of appropriate amps. The main difference I see is with Nuckolls method, the alternator has to send it's current through the battery contactor. Where as the B&C diagram bypasses it and goes directly to the main bus. Which is better? Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services ---------------------------------------------------------- ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY ** ---------------------------------------------------------- http://www.usenet.com The input side of the starter contactor is connected to the output side of the master contactor, and a heavy line goes from that same point to feed the bus through the ammeter. Connecting the alternator to that terminal will run all its current through the ammeter, which you don't want. The ammeter would show a discharge even though the battery is charging. Run the line to the bus, through a breaker. The ammeter will then read properly, and you will have a protected circuit. Dan |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm not sure I am exactly following your descriptions. However one
consideration that may have Aeroelectric Bob running the B lead through the starter contactor, is the battery can be used as something of a filter for any alternater noise if the current goes to the battery then the buss, as opposed to going directly to the buss from the alternator. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:25:48 -0800 (PST), Doug Palmer
wrote: I'm not sure I am exactly following your descriptions. However one consideration that may have Aeroelectric Bob running the B lead through the starter contactor, is the battery can be used as something of a filter for any alternater noise if the current goes to the battery then the buss, as opposed to going directly to the buss from the alternator. That's what he does it for, to reduce the noise from the B lead, from what I gathered reading his book. Rich |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 18, 9:15 pm, Sliker wrote:
That's what he does it for, to reduce the noise from the B lead, from what I gathered reading his book. Rich The output side of the master contactor, and input side of the starter contactor, are wired together and the bus is also connected to that same point, so it will make no difference at all in terms of noise filtering. The only difference will be a wrong-reading ammeter, since the ammeter is installed between the master contactor and bus, and electron flow during discharge is from the bus, through the ammeter, and via the contactor to the battery. Connecting the alternator to this point will have electon flow from the bus, through the ammeter, to the alternator via that same path, making it show a discharge at all times when the alternator is running. I don't think you want that. If the alternator is connected to the bus (through a breaker), the electron flow runs from the battery (backwards, so it's charging) to the contactor and, through the ammeter to the bus and from there to the alternator. The ammeter properly shows a charge, since the flow is reversed, now. Isn't that what you really want? Scroll about halfway down this page to the diagram without the the overvoltage sensor: http://ronkilber.tripod.com/alternat/alternat.htm See how the alternator is connected. And see what would happen if it was connected instead to the contactor. Dan |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:32:59 -0800 (PST),
wrote: On Feb 18, 9:15 pm, Sliker wrote: That's what he does it for, to reduce the noise from the B lead, from what I gathered reading his book. Rich The output side of the master contactor, and input side of the starter contactor, are wired together and the bus is also connected to that same point, so it will make no difference at all in terms of noise filtering. The only difference will be a wrong-reading ammeter, since the ammeter is installed between the master contactor and bus, and electron flow during discharge is from the bus, through the ammeter, and via the contactor to the battery. Connecting the alternator to this point will have electon flow from the bus, through the ammeter, to the alternator via that same path, making it show a discharge at all times when the alternator is running. I don't think you want that. If the alternator is connected to the bus (through a breaker), the electron flow runs from the battery (backwards, so it's charging) to the contactor and, through the ammeter to the bus and from there to the alternator. The ammeter properly shows a charge, since the flow is reversed, now. Isn't that what you really want? Scroll about halfway down this page to the diagram without the the overvoltage sensor: http://ronkilber.tripod.com/alternat/alternat.htm See how the alternator is connected. And see what would happen if it was connected instead to the contactor. Dan That's exactly the way I want to hook it up. Although, I do remember in reading Bob's book that with that setup he suggests hooking up the amp meter between the batteries ground post and the ground bus to get it to read right. But I'm just going to run the alternator wire directly to the main bus through a breaker and use shielded wire. If the shield does it's job, the noise should be grounded out. I even noticed that some of the later wiring diagrams from B&C show the alternator wire connecting to the starter contactor. So they are in agreement with Bob on that one. But that's just one way to do it, there are others. The wiring diagram I like best is the one in The Sportplane builder and in Firewall forward, by Tony Bengilis. And thank goodness in his book he shows how to wire my Bendix shower of sparks mags. That's the only place I've found that wiring diagram. Although, after looking at it, it's pretty simple. I had thought that the shower of sparks mags were really modern, until I read a similar system was installed in the Model A Ford. :-) Rich |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 19, 10:54 am, Sliker wrote:
That's exactly the way I want to hook it up. Although, I do remember in reading Bob's book that with that setup he suggests hooking up the amp meter between the batteries ground post and the ground bus to get it to read right. If you put the ammeter between the battery's ground post and ground, you'd have all the starter current running through it. It would smoke pretty good. Starters draw hundreds of amps. Grounding the starter separately would be pretty difficult, since it's grounded to the engine through its mount, and the engine is grounded to the airplane as a return path for both the starter and alternator, which is also firmly grounded to the engine through its mount. The alternator, though, should have a separate ground wire to keep noise to a minimum. Dan |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 19, 12:38 pm, Sliker wrote:
Sounds like another reason not to use that alternator wiring method. I also remember reading about him mentioning using a high amperage rated shunt for the amp meter when used in that location. The issues seem to snowball. I have one question, if the B lead were hooked up to the starter contactor, would reversing the wires on the amp meter make it read correctly? Nope. Now it would read "charge" all the time, even during discharge. The ammeter is an indication of what the battery is doing. It needs to be wired as shown so that there are two directions of electron flow so you know whether the alternator is managing to keep up or not. If the alternator's output isn't wired to the bus itself rather than the contactor, you'll have no idea if it's working properly. The ammeter won't be able to tell you anything worthwhile. Dan |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nippondenso Alternator Wiring | CW Crane | Home Built | 1 | January 4th 07 02:05 AM |
Alternator field cycling & alternator damage | Nathan Young | Owning | 7 | November 14th 04 09:02 PM |
q alternator 152 | Euromotors | Piloting | 2 | July 16th 04 09:34 AM |
Turbo Alternator | Wyatt Emmerich | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | January 19th 04 02:35 PM |
Skylane Alternator | MLenoch | Piloting | 1 | December 8th 03 02:37 PM |