A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Pennsylvania To Require 2 Locks On GA Aircraft Under Threat Of Criminal Penalties



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 11th 08, 04:16 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,953
Default Pennsylvania To Require 2 Locks On GA Aircraft Under Threat Of Criminal Penalties


Remember when former Pennsylvania senator Rick Santorum (R) proposed
that the National Weather Service remove the information it provides
on its web site, so that Pennsylvania based Accuweather could provide
it at a fee?* Well, here's another illogical imposition on GA
proposed by that state:


http://www.aopa.org/advocacy/article.../080306pa.html
AOPA seeks member support to oppose two-lock rule
By AOPA ePublishing staff

There are no laws requiring you to lock up your car, your RV, or,
in many states, your guns. But lawmakers in Pennsylvania want to
require not one, but two, locks for all general aviation aircraft
and create criminal penalties for failing to use them—a move AOPA
strongly opposes.

In a March 5 letter** to the House Transportation Committee, AOPA
reminded lawmakers that the federal government has determined that
GA is not a threat and that GA aircraft are infrequently stolen.

AOPA also has contacted members in key districts, asking them to
urge their state representatives to oppose the measure. AOPA will
testify against the draft bill during a planned March 11 hearing.

“Criminalizing failure to lock your aircraft is an outrageous
overreaction to security concerns,” said AOPA Vice President of
Regional Affairs Greg Pecoraro. “This level of government
intrusion is unacceptable and far exceeds the legitimate needs of
general aviation security.”

AOPA and the federal Transportation Security Administration have
partnered to promote GA security using the “Lock up, Look Out”
message of the Airport Watch program. The program strongly
recommends, but does not mandate, that pilots lock their aircraft.

March 6, 2008



*
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...78183d40524510


** http://www.aopa.org/advocacy/article...pa-letter.html
  #2  
Old March 12th 08, 12:48 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
BT
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 995
Default Pennsylvania To Require 2 Locks On GA Aircraft Under Threat Of Criminal Penalties

I've got two locks.. the lock on the door and the lock on the ignition (mags
switch).
Two locks does not make a difference, use chains for tie downs, put a pad
lock through them, and any one with the "Master Key" (Bolt cutter) can get
the aircraft.

Locks only keep out honest people.

BT

"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...

Remember when former Pennsylvania senator Rick Santorum (R) proposed
that the National Weather Service remove the information it provides
on its web site, so that Pennsylvania based Accuweather could provide
it at a fee?* Well, here's another illogical imposition on GA
proposed by that state:


http://www.aopa.org/advocacy/article.../080306pa.html
AOPA seeks member support to oppose two-lock rule
By AOPA ePublishing staff

There are no laws requiring you to lock up your car, your RV, or,
in many states, your guns. But lawmakers in Pennsylvania want to
require not one, but two, locks for all general aviation aircraft
and create criminal penalties for failing to use them-a move AOPA
strongly opposes.

In a March 5 letter** to the House Transportation Committee, AOPA
reminded lawmakers that the federal government has determined that
GA is not a threat and that GA aircraft are infrequently stolen.

AOPA also has contacted members in key districts, asking them to
urge their state representatives to oppose the measure. AOPA will
testify against the draft bill during a planned March 11 hearing.

"Criminalizing failure to lock your aircraft is an outrageous
overreaction to security concerns," said AOPA Vice President of
Regional Affairs Greg Pecoraro. "This level of government
intrusion is unacceptable and far exceeds the legitimate needs of
general aviation security."

AOPA and the federal Transportation Security Administration have
partnered to promote GA security using the "Lock up, Look Out"
message of the Airport Watch program. The program strongly
recommends, but does not mandate, that pilots lock their aircraft.

March 6, 2008



*
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...78183d40524510


** http://www.aopa.org/advocacy/article...pa-letter.html



  #3  
Old March 12th 08, 07:11 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,953
Default Pennsylvania To Require 2 Locks On GA Aircraft Under Threat Of Criminal Penalties

On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:48:28 -0700, "BT" wrote
in :

I've got two locks.. the lock on the door and the lock on the ignition (mags
switch).
Two locks does not make a difference, use chains for tie downs, put a pad
lock through them, and any one with the "Master Key" (Bolt cutter) can get
the aircraft.

Locks only keep out honest people.

BT


Oh, in Pennsylvania the thieves (or politicians) must not be smart
enough to operate bolt cutters. :-)

  #4  
Old March 12th 08, 01:35 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mark T. Dame
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 67
Default Pennsylvania To Require 2 Locks On GA Aircraft Under Threat OfCriminal Penalties

Larry Dighera wrote:
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:48:28 -0700, "BT" wrote
in :

I've got two locks.. the lock on the door and the lock on the ignition (mags
switch).
Two locks does not make a difference, use chains for tie downs, put a pad
lock through them, and any one with the "Master Key" (Bolt cutter) can get
the aircraft.

Locks only keep out honest people.

BT


Oh, in Pennsylvania the thieves (or politicians) must not be smart
enough to operate bolt cutters. :-)


That must be why they haven't passed a concealed bolt cutter carry law yet.


-m
--
## Mark T. Dame
## CP-ASEL-IA, CFI-A, AGI
## insert tail number here
## KHAO, KISZ
"Unix gives you just enough rope to hang yourself -- and then a
couple of more feet, just to be sure."
-- Eric Allman

"... We make rope."
-- Rob Gingell on Sun Microsystem's new virtual memory.
  #5  
Old March 12th 08, 07:10 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Just go look it up!
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 34
Default Pennsylvania To Require 2 Locks On GA Aircraft Under Threat Of Criminal Penalties

On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 07:11:51 GMT, Larry Dighera
wrote:

On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:48:28 -0700, "BT" wrote
in :

I've got two locks.. the lock on the door and the lock on the ignition (mags
switch).
Two locks does not make a difference, use chains for tie downs, put a pad
lock through them, and any one with the "Master Key" (Bolt cutter) can get
the aircraft.

Locks only keep out honest people.

BT


Oh, in Pennsylvania the thieves (or politicians) must not be smart
enough to operate bolt cutters. :-)


Is this something to attempt to draw attention away from Specter's
rediculous NFL hearings?
  #6  
Old March 13th 08, 02:07 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Stealth Pilot[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 846
Default Pennsylvania To Require 2 Locks On GA Aircraft Under Threat Of Criminal Penalties

On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:16:13 GMT, Larry Dighera
wrote:


There are no laws requiring you to lock up your car, your RV, or,
in many states, your guns. But lawmakers in Pennsylvania want to
require not one, but two, locks for all general aviation aircraft
and create criminal penalties for failing to use them—a move AOPA
strongly opposes.


before you go silly on this.

get two pieces of alooominum.
bend them into U shapes big/small enough to drape over the rods behind
the knobs for the throttle and mixture.
drill a hole through the tabs that hang down. put an el cheapo
letterbox lock out of home depot through each tab.

you've met the intent of the law and really ****ed off anyone who
wants to steal your aircraft.

in australia we'd get these cheapo made in china lockwood locks in
blister packs of 4 from Bunnings. You'll have to go to the american
clone - home depot.

Stealth (you can drill a hole cant you?) Pilot
  #7  
Old March 13th 08, 05:25 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,953
Default Pennsylvania To Require 2 Locks On GA Aircraft Under Threat Of Criminal Penalties

On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 23:07:06 +0900, Stealth Pilot
wrote:

On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:16:13 GMT, Larry Dighera
wrote:


There are no laws requiring you to lock up your car, your RV, or,
in many states, your guns. But lawmakers in Pennsylvania want to
require not one, but two, locks for all general aviation aircraft
and create criminal penalties for failing to use them—a move AOPA
strongly opposes.


before you go silly on this.

get two pieces of alooominum.
bend them into U shapes big/small enough to drape over the rods behind
the knobs for the throttle and mixture.
drill a hole through the tabs that hang down. put an el cheapo
letterbox lock out of home depot through each tab.

you've met the intent of the law and really ****ed off anyone who
wants to steal your aircraft.

in australia we'd get these cheapo made in china lockwood locks in
blister packs of 4 from Bunnings. You'll have to go to the american
clone - home depot.


That's a simple way to comply with the proposed Pennsylvania statute,
but that's not the issue.

The issue is whether it's appropriate for a state to impose their laws
on federally certified aircraft. It would seem to be that the state
of Pennsylvania does not possess jurisdiction over what is used on
government regulated aircraft. Permitting this statute to become law
may set a precedent that will open a flood of inconsistent aviation
laws by individual states. And imposing criminal penalties on pilots
who don't comply with it is even worse.

Aircraft security is a federal matter.


  #8  
Old March 13th 08, 08:22 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Peter Dohm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,754
Default Pennsylvania To Require 2 Locks On GA Aircraft Under Threat Of Criminal Penalties


"Stealth Pilot" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:16:13 GMT, Larry Dighera
wrote:


There are no laws requiring you to lock up your car, your RV, or,
in many states, your guns. But lawmakers in Pennsylvania want to
require not one, but two, locks for all general aviation aircraft
and create criminal penalties for failing to use them-a move AOPA
strongly opposes.


before you go silly on this.

get two pieces of alooominum.
bend them into U shapes big/small enough to drape over the rods behind
the knobs for the throttle and mixture.
drill a hole through the tabs that hang down. put an el cheapo
letterbox lock out of home depot through each tab.

you've met the intent of the law and really ****ed off anyone who
wants to steal your aircraft.

in australia we'd get these cheapo made in china lockwood locks in
blister packs of 4 from Bunnings. You'll have to go to the american
clone - home depot.

Stealth (you can drill a hole cant you?) Pilot


We all know of additional ways to attach locks to various types of aircraft,
as well as ways to remove them. Most of us also know of various
entertaining ways to render aircraft unflyable--some of which could be
interpreted so as to cause us liability.

However, I believe that this is simply a bad idea, probably useless, and not
the proper business of the State of Pennsylvania.

Peter



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
control locks were still locked when the aircraft took off ( Video-Footage ) Hansi Piloting 15 April 13th 06 05:58 PM
control locks were still locked when the aircraft took off ( Video-Footage ) [email protected] Instrument Flight Rules 6 April 6th 06 07:39 PM
control locks were still locked when the aircraft took off ( Video-Footage ) [email protected] General Aviation 4 April 3rd 06 05:30 PM
Graduated Penalties (JJ needs a new project) Dave Nadler \YO\ Soaring 5 September 26th 03 07:47 PM
Graduated Penalties Andy Durbin Soaring 1 September 26th 03 01:53 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.