![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We wouldn't be getting our troops killed/maimed/psychologically
scarred in Iraq if we hadn't gone in there for Israel to begin with (scroll down to the 'A Clean Break' post at http://NEOCONZIONISTTHREAT.BLOGSPOT.COM). Check out the following as well.. Keep in mind that courageous American Jew (Jack Bernstein) warned US that Zionist Jews would trick US into fighting wars in the Middle East for Israel with many Americans to die/get horribly maimed in the process like we have already experienced in Iraq with Iran on deck: Robert Stiver wrote: Here's the latest commentary by an informed, deeply concerned citizen: http://www.antiwar.com/pat/?articleid=12673 ("Petraeus Points to War With Iran," by Patrick Buchanan, April 11th, 2008) (I disagree with one element of Buchanan's analysis: "The general's testimony is forcing Bush's hand...." Petraeus is, IMHO, an ambitious, willing military-side stooge for the Cheney-led zionazineocons [note particularly the odious Lieberman in the article] and the dry- drunkenly adolescent, bellicose, irrational Bush. A lethal combination, and Gates and Mullen -- with Fallon gone and no longer providing adult supervision -- today added additional voice to the warmongering set....) The Evil USrael Empire is on the march to war...Bob April 11, 2008 Petraeus Points to War With Iran by Patrick J. Buchanan The neocons may yet get their war on Iran. Ever since President Nouri al-Maliki ordered the attacks in Basra on the Mahdi Army, Gen. David Petraeus has been laying the predicate for U.S. air strikes on Iran and a wider war in the Middle East. Iran, Petraeus told the Senate Armed Services Committee, has "fueled the recent violence in a particularly damaging way through its lethal support of the special groups." These "special groups" are "funded, trained, armed and directed by Iran's Quds Force with help from Lebanese Hezbollah. It was these groups that launched Iranian rockets and mortar rounds at Iraq's seat of government (the Green Zone) ... causing loss of innocent life and fear in the capital." Is the Iranian government aware of this - and behind it? "President Ahmadinejad and other Iranian leaders" promised to end their "support for the special groups," said the general, but the "nefarious activities of the Quds force have continued." Are Iranians then murdering Americans, asked Joe Lieberman: "Is it fair to say that the Iranian-backed special groups in Iraq are responsible for the murder of hundreds of American soldiers and thousands of Iraqi soldiers and civilians?" "It certainly is. ... That is correct," said Petraeus. The following day, Petraeus told the House Armed Services Committee, "Unchecked, the 'special groups' pose the greatest long-term threat to the viability of a democratic Iraq." Translation: The United States is now fighting the proxies of Iran for the future of Iraq. The general's testimony is forcing Bush's hand, for consider the question it logically raises: If the Quds Force and Hezbollah, both designated as terrorist organizations, are arming, training and directing "special groups" to "murder" Americans, and rocket and mortar the Green Zone to kill our diplomats, and they now represent the No. 1 threat to a free Iraq, why has Bush failed to neutralize these base camps of terror and aggression? Hence, be not surprised if President Bush appears before the TV cameras, one day soon, to decla "My commanding general in Iraq, David Petraeus, has told me that Iran, with the knowledge of President Ahmadinejad, has become a privileged sanctuary for two terrorist organizations - Hezbollah and the Quds Force of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard - to train, arm and direct terrorist attacks on U.S. and coalition forces, despite repeated promises to halt this murderous practice. "I have therefore directed U.S. air and naval forces to begin air strikes on these base camps of terror. Our attacks will continue until the Iranian attacks cease." Because of the failures of a Democratic Congress elected to end the war, Bush can now make a compelling case that he would be acting fully within his authority as commander-in-chief. In early 2007, Nancy Pelosi pulled down a resolution that would have denied Bush the authority to attack Iran without congressional approval. In September, both Houses passed the Kyl-Lieberman resolution designating the Iranian Revolutionary Guard a terrorist organization. Courtesy of Congress, Bush thus has a blank check for war on Iran. And the signs are growing that he intends to fill it in and cash it. Israel has been hurling invective at Iran and conducting security drills to prepare its population for rocket barrages worse than those Hezbollah delivered in the Lebanon War. Adm. William "Fox" Fallon, the Central Command head who opposed war with Iran, has been removed. Hamas and Hezbollah have been stocking up on Qassam and Katyusha rockets. Vice President Cheney has lately toured Arab capitals. And President Ahmadinejad just made international headlines by declaring that Tehran will begin installing 6,000 advanced centrifuges to accelerate Iran's enrichment of uranium. This is Bush's last chance to strike and, when Iran responds, to effect its nuclear castration. Are Bush and Cheney likely to pass up this last chance to destroy Iran's nuclear facilities and effect the election of John McCain? For any attack on Iran's "terrorist bases" would rally the GOP and drive a wedge between Obama and Hillary. Indeed, Sen. Clinton, who voted to declare Iran's Revolutionary Guard a terrorist organization, could hardly denounce Bush for ordering air strikes on the Revolutionary Guards' Quds Force, when Petraeus testified, in her presence, that it is behind the serial murder of U.S. soldiers. The Iranians may sense what is afoot. For Tehran helped broker the truce in the Maliki-Sadr clash in Basra, and has called for a halt to the mortar and rocket attacks on the Green Zone. With a friendly regime in Baghdad that rolled out the red carpet for Ahmadinejad, Iran has nothing to gain by war. Already, it is the big winner from the U.S. wars that took down Tehran's Taliban enemies, decimated its al-Qaeda enemies and destroyed its Sunni enemies, Saddam and his Baath Party. No, it is not Iran that wants a war with the United States. It is the United States that has reasons to want a short, sharp war with Iran. April 13, 2008 1:35 AM ------------------------------------------------------------------- Iran War, Real Fear Petraeus Beating War Drums for Attack Why aren't we talking about this (be sure to scroll down to the comments section at the following URL): http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot....bout-this.html http://TinyUrl.com/3vue6c -------------------------------------------------------- My concern is that Hillary Clinton (and other AIPAC hacks in the Senate) have basically given Bush the authority to bomb the IRGC after they approved labeling the IRGC as a 'terrorist group' via passing the Kyl-Lieberman Iran amendment (Seymour Hersh mentions why Hillary did such via the last part of the following URL from Amy Goodman's 'Democracy Now' broadcast): http://www.democracynow.org/2007/10/...nsifying_plans Be sure to read the UPI article about the 'JINSA crowd' which leads off the following URL: U.S. Middle East policy motivated by pro-Israel lobby: http://tinyurl.com/5z9ja3 AIPAC is Pushing US to War with Iran for Israel (see the Scott Ritter youtubes in the comments section for how he mentioned AIPAC and that nukes might be used on Iran as well): http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot....with-iran.html The Power of the Israel Lobby in the United States http://www.informationclearinghouse....ticle17525.htm http://www.vpro.nl/programma/plaatsd...edia/33964115/ A War for Israel? Colin Powell seems to think so: http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/zone0...ic.php?t=61128 Here is the tiny URL for the above referenced 'Democracy Now' broadcast: Seymour Hersh: White House Intensifying Plans to Attack Iran http://tinyurl.com/6lsrew |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How do you explain the many times over the last few years you
proclaimed the war was imminent and NOTHING HAPPENED? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 13, 2:18 pm, Matt wrote:
How do you explain the many times over the last few years you proclaimed the war was imminent and NOTHING HAPPENED? If he waits long enough,there's always a *slim* chance it *might* happen. Then he will scream he knew it all along. I'd still like him better if he'd just shut up. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 14, 6:15�am, eyeball wrote:
On Apr 13, 2:18 pm, Matt wrote: How do you explain the many times over the last few years you proclaimed the war was imminent and NOTHING HAPPENED? If he waits long enough,there's always a *slim* chance it *might* happen. Then he will scream he knew it all along. I'd still like him better if he'd just shut up. I wonder what his stance will be "if" Hillary or Obama gets elected in November? Ahmadinejad has been pretty quiet this year compared to 2006-2007 as well. But if McCain gets in, expect the rhetoric to start up again... and even crazier postings! Rob |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Well, ya gotta do something with all those retiring F-117s. We don't need to occupy Iran, just blow the **** out of it. Between the B-1s, B-2s, 117s and the U.S. Navy, it would be trivially easy to destroy their Navy, Air Force, nuke plant, mechanized army, oil reserves... I don't think there's any reason to go to war with the infantry as long as their mobility is eliminated since they can't seem to silence their Whackjob in Chief. -c |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Iran War, Real Fear Petraeus Beating War Drums for Attack | NOMOREWARFORISRAEL[_2_] | Naval Aviation | 7 | April 13th 08 07:58 PM |
Iran Prepares for Global Nuclear War ....Iran will be on the receiving end.... | AirRaid[_5_] | Naval Aviation | 0 | April 30th 07 03:56 AM |
More points to ponder | Montblack | Piloting | 0 | February 7th 06 08:38 PM |
Two fine points of FAR interpretation | Dave Russell | Piloting | 14 | July 20th 04 04:17 AM |