Hey Lenny, where's Squiggy?

Violence against those who invade a foreign country or someone else's
home is acceptable and even desired.

Can you imagine losing an arm or leg or getting raped in a meaningless
war? The dummies going to Iraq are evil suckers. They use violence
against civilians in Iraq when, if they were brave, would rather be
using violence against the politicians and senior officers who sent
them.

But they are just following orders.

"Leonard Caillouet" wrote in message news:qysSb.1392$Yj.459@lakeread02...
"John Galt" wrote in message
om...
If the these female "soldiers" had any courage, they would desert and
not invade someone else's country. They deserve rape by their fellow
coward soldiers.

So John, you are apparently anti-war, correct? Are you another one of those
who has such high ethics regarding invading another's country that you feel
the US action in Iraq is wrong? Such high-end ethical consideration seems
inconsistent with such an insensitivity to rape. Hmm, it seems that an
intellect capable of such consideration for people of another country would
see a contradiction in promoting rape and desertion. Many of us would love
to have a reason to oppose sending our sons and daughters into danger, but I
must say, your arguments do less to persuade than they do to make you look
foolish.

Leonard Caillouet

On 30 Jan 2004 10:31:22 -0800, John Galt wrote in
us.military.army,rec.aviation.military:

Violence against those who invade a foreign country or someone else's
home is acceptable and even desired.

Can you imagine losing an arm or leg or getting raped in a meaningless
war? The dummies going to Iraq are evil suckers. They use violence
against civilians in Iraq when, if they were brave, would rather be
using violence against the politicians and senior officers who sent
them.

But they are just following orders.

You keep saying the same thing over and over, what are *you* doing (besides
whining on Usenet) to help solve this problem you see?

Oh yeah, which tax-free gas station do you go to again?

Dave
--
You can talk about us, but you can't talk without us!
US Army Signal Corps!!
http://www.geocities.com/davidcasey98

"John Galt" wrote in message
om...
Violence against those who invade a foreign country or someone else's
home is acceptable and even desired.

Can you imagine losing an arm or leg or getting raped in a meaningless
war? The dummies going to Iraq are evil suckers. They use violence
against civilians in Iraq when, if they were brave, would rather be
using violence against the politicians and senior officers who sent
them.

But they are just following orders.

You are not just an idiot, but an idiot that contradicts himself...

Violence is never "desired" by any rational person. It is necessary
sometime.

Iraq did invade a foreign country and members of its hideously brutal regime
regularly invaded the homes of it citizens and took their lives and liberty.

Suggesting using violence against politicians and officers who send them
shows more that you are a fool who has little constructive to communicate.
In this country our soldiers are volunteers and we can become politically
active to change the path that our politicians take. We don't need to
settle political differences with violence. On the other hand, regimes like
that of SH and the Taliban can only be removed with military action. Our
actions in Iraq and Afghanistan have been righteous and have been carried
out by the bravest, best trained, best equipped military the world has ever
known.

The loss of life or limb is always tragic. You are despicable for rejoicing
in it or suggesting that violence be desired.

Leonard Caillouet