![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just happened to see a sticker on a fuel pump today that stated "may
contain up to 10% ethanol" while I was filling my car this morning. Upon further investigation with my fuel retailer, the local fuel jobber, and the fuel distributor here in Spokane, Washington that there is a federal mandate to add 9 billion gallons of ethanol per year to the nationwide gasoline fuel stream. A new twist is a 5.1 cent per gallon federal fuel tax break to the oil companies to get this "alternative" fuel into the market. Tomorrow (April 8) is the first day of the program and the dealers get their price tonight. According to my sources, there is a possibility that some retailers may opt out, however if that 5.1 cent break is passed on to them, it won't be likely. I was lucky and just happened to ask the right question at the right time. I haven't seen an outcry on this issue by EAA, AOPA or any other aviation group. This is a nationwide situation. Not just in a few states. You may not find non-ethanol autogas at your usual outlet. Our jobber started mixing in ethanol last week, however I had not purchased any since mid-March so was unaware. In essence, with the 5.1 cent per gallon tax break, the US federal government has just killed the Aviation autogas concept. I'm trying to locate a new source, but may not be successful. The ethanol is added at the distribution rack. Chevron and a couple others are requiring their retailers to go to E-10. Al Spokane, Wa 1964 Skyhawk with an AutoGas STC |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 7, 7:41*pm, Al wrote:
I just happened to see a sticker on a fuel pump today that stated "may contain up to 10% ethanol" while I was filling my car this morning. Upon further investigation with my fuel retailer, the local fuel jobber, and the fuel distributor here in Spokane, Washington that there is a federal mandate to add 9 billion gallons of ethanol per year to the nationwide gasoline fuel stream. *A new twist is a 5.1 cent per gallon federal fuel tax break to the oil companies to get this "alternative" fuel into the market. *Tomorrow (April 8) is the first day of the program and the dealers get their price tonight. *According to my sources, there is a possibility that some retailers may opt out, however if that 5.1 cent break is passed on to them, it won't be likely. I bet the days of seaplane cross country flying are done. You aren't going to find ethanol free gas at the docks either. -Robert |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 07 Apr 2008 19:41:39 -0700, Al
wrote: This is a nationwide situation. Not just in a few states. You may not find non-ethanol autogas at your usual outlet. The local airport stocks mogas without additives, which is a huge boon to people like me who don't want to put the alky-diluted stuff in our small engines (snowblower, lawnmower, chainsaw) where it can literally gum the works. It was four dollars a gallon last time I brought the stuff home, but I don't use that many gallons in a year. Happily for us, you can't transport alky-gas over long distances in pipelines or on tankers, so the stuff is mixed at the port of entry, which for us is Portland ME, sixty miles north. When the airport owner needs to fill the mogas main supply, he orders us a truckload of the unadulterated stuff from the terminal. This began here four or five years ago as a way of getting mogas without MBTE in it. Though not as objectional as alcohol, the purists didn't want to put it in their airplane tanks. Blue skies! -- Dan Ford Claire Chennault and His American Volunteers, 1941-1942 new from HarperCollins www.FlyingTigersBook.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In essence, with the 5.1 cent per gallon tax break, the US federal
government has just killed the Aviation autogas concept. Thanks for the head's up. We've used over 9,000 gallons of mogas in our Lycoming O-540, without a burp, at a savings of well over $10K. Obviously this change will be catastrophic if it is, indeed, nationwide. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 8, 8:22 am, "Jay Honeck" wrote:
In essence, with the 5.1 cent per gallon tax break, the US federal government has just killed the Aviation autogas concept. Thanks for the head's up. We've used over 9,000 gallons of mogas in our Lycoming O-540, without a burp, at a savings of well over $10K. Obviously this change will be catastrophic if it is, indeed, nationwide. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" The Conti E-185 in the '47 V tail Bonanza is STCed for mogas, but the biggest problem is getting it to the airplane. Jay -- what changes do you see in leaning, startup, etc with mogas v. 100ll? Dan Mc |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay -- what changes do you see in leaning, startup, etc with mogas v.
100ll? The only changes we've seen a - The oil doesn't turn black - The plugs don't foul with little BBs of lead - There is an extra $10,000 in the bank Anyone who's got the mogas STC and is choosing not to use it is needlessly burning Ben Franklins at a breath-taking rate. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 8, 9:13*am, "Jay Honeck" wrote:
Jay -- what changes do you see in leaning, startup, etc with mogas v. 100ll? The only changes we've seen a - The oil doesn't turn black - The plugs don't foul with little BBs of lead - There is an extra $10,000 in the bank Anyone who's got the mogas STC and is choosing not to use it is needlessly burning Ben Franklins at a breath-taking rate. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" But burning Ben Franklins at a breath-taking rate is normal operation for aviation. Hence the AMU to lessen the shock. I'm only kidding of course and if you can burn mogas that's great. I'm in Florida and our gas pumps are also sprouting the "Ethanol less than 10%" stickers. I heard a blurb on NPR the other day that it's mandated by the feds for the summer to lessen polution. I think, if I recall correctly that that's how it started in California as well. The point of the news blurb was that ethanol prices are spiking causing gas prices to rise. Also, since they're using corn, tortillas and Fritos will rise as well. I'm really thinking that diesel is where piston aviation is going to survive at all and that will be a significant blow due to the costs of upgrading existing planes. Most won't bother, I think. Jay, if your only alternative to keep flying was to drop, say, $40K into a diesel conversion for Atlas, would you? I don't own (yet) so I'll have to deal with the rental fleet. John |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 8, 2:59*am, Cubdriver usenet AT danford DOT net wrote:
On Mon, 07 Apr 2008 19:41:39 -0700, Al wrote: This is a nationwide situation. *Not just in a few states. *You may not find non-ethanol autogas at your usual outlet. * The local airport stocks mogas without additives, which is a huge boon to people like me who don't want to put the alky-diluted stuff in our small engines (snowblower, lawnmower, chainsaw) where it can literally gum the works. It was four dollars a gallon last time I brought the stuff home, but I don't use that many gallons in a year. I believe out here in California its illegal to sell mogas w/o the ethanol. -robert |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Take a look at last week's Time magazine cover article on the great myth of
ethanol. It turns out that the list of 'unintended consequences' is quite long and the net effect of increased ethanol usage is far more damaging to the environment than the use of oil-based fuels. (This does not address the damage to engines, the decreased performance (which means more fuel burned), impact on other commodities, etc etc). But of course, to 'Big Corn' (corollary to 'Big Oil') the fact that ethanol is far from our salvation is ignored. Also by the various politicians who are deep into the pockets of 'Big Corn'. wrote in message ... On Apr 8, 9:13 am, "Jay Honeck" wrote: Jay -- what changes do you see in leaning, startup, etc with mogas v. 100ll? The only changes we've seen a - The oil doesn't turn black - The plugs don't foul with little BBs of lead - There is an extra $10,000 in the bank Anyone who's got the mogas STC and is choosing not to use it is needlessly burning Ben Franklins at a breath-taking rate. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" But burning Ben Franklins at a breath-taking rate is normal operation for aviation. Hence the AMU to lessen the shock. I'm only kidding of course and if you can burn mogas that's great. I'm in Florida and our gas pumps are also sprouting the "Ethanol less than 10%" stickers. I heard a blurb on NPR the other day that it's mandated by the feds for the summer to lessen polution. I think, if I recall correctly that that's how it started in California as well. The point of the news blurb was that ethanol prices are spiking causing gas prices to rise. Also, since they're using corn, tortillas and Fritos will rise as well. I'm really thinking that diesel is where piston aviation is going to survive at all and that will be a significant blow due to the costs of upgrading existing planes. Most won't bother, I think. Jay, if your only alternative to keep flying was to drop, say, $40K into a diesel conversion for Atlas, would you? I don't own (yet) so I'll have to deal with the rental fleet. John |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"pgbnh" wrote in message
... Take a look at last week's Time magazine cover article on the great myth of ethanol. It turns out that the list of 'unintended consequences' is quite long and the net effect of increased ethanol usage is far more damaging to the environment than the use of oil-based fuels. (This does not address the damage to engines, the decreased performance (which means more fuel burned), impact on other commodities, etc etc). But of course, to 'Big Corn' (corollary to 'Big Oil') the fact that ethanol is far from our salvation is ignored. Also by the various politicians who are deep into the pockets of 'Big Corn'. If it were not such a dissaster for the country, and all of us in it, all of that would really be quite amusing. ADM, et al, have gotten the environmentalists signed onto yet another scheme that does little more than pick our pockets and polute everything in sight--it's MTBE back and bigger than ever. Peter |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A GA pilot's worst nightmare? | Kingfish | Piloting | 49 | February 1st 07 02:51 PM |
Our Worst Nightmare? | alank | Piloting | 56 | January 10th 07 10:10 AM |
Nightmare (long story) | JJS | Owning | 7 | April 2nd 06 11:34 PM |
Eurofighter is turning into German nightmare | Chad Irby | Military Aviation | 45 | October 4th 03 03:18 AM |
(long) WxWorx arrived... | Tom S. | Piloting | 0 | September 9th 03 04:54 PM |