![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() How Beat The High Cost Of Fuel Randall Fishman, president of Electric Aircraft Corp., flew his ultralight trike at EAA Airventure 2007, Oshkosh. "I flew the trike in front of the crowds, and the trike was mobbed with people every day. The EAA folks really loved the idea." The ElectraFlyer won the Grand Champion Ultralight and Innovation awards. This year Fishman hopes to fly his new ElectraFlyer-C (a re-engined Moni motorglider with an 18-horsepower electric motor) at EAA Airventure 2008. The ElectraFlyer-C cruises at 70 mph, stalls at 45 mph, and has a top speed of 90 mph and a flight duration of ~1-1/2 hours. The electric motor directly drives a 45-inch ground adjustable, two-blade PowerFin carbon fiber propeller, which lifts the aircraft at a climb rate of 500 to 600 fpm. The experimental amateur-built airplane is currently in its required 40-hour flight testing phase. http://registry.faa.gov/aircraftinqu...cmndfin d.y=5 The motor is powered by a 78 pound, custom-built lithium-ion polymer battery with a power output of "5.6 kilowatt hours"; projected life is 300 to 500 full discharge cycles or more than 1,000 partial cycles. The battery can be recharged in as little as two hours using a 220-volt charger (or six hours with a 110-volt charger). The cost for a full recharge is 70 cents with the 110-volt charger. Fishman says it's feasible to carry a small 110-volt charger as baggage on cross-country flights. More information: http://www.flickr.com/photos/2722498...56704/sizes/o/ http://www.electraflyer.com/electraflyerc.html http://www.flickr.com/photos/2722498...7605355156982/ Video: http://www.electraflyer.com/news.html http://www.aero-news.net/news/sport....e-f146a285a148 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 16, 7:37 pm, Larry Dighera wrote:
How Beat The High Cost Of Fuel The motor is powered by a 78 pound, custom-built lithium-ion polymer battery with a power output of "5.6 kilowatt hours"; projected life is 300 to 500 full discharge cycles or more than 1,000 partial cycles. The battery can be recharged in as little as two hours using a 220-volt charger (or six hours with a 110-volt charger). The cost for a full recharge is 70 cents with the 110-volt charger. Fishman says it's feasible to carry a small 110-volt charger as baggage on cross-country flights. 1 horsepower = .75kw. So 5.6 kilowatt hours is only 7.51 horsepower hours. Good enough for a short burst to get you to altitude and soar the thermals, bu you aren't going anywhere cross country. Compare it to a really inefficient 2 stroke, burning .6 lb/hp-hr. Your battery is equal to .75 gallons of gas. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Very splendid, I like very muchhentai sexshower sexbritish office sexpublic sex videosfree anime sex videos
__________________
health |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 20:42:12 -0700 (PDT), Richard Riley
wrote in : On Jun 16, 7:37 pm, Larry Dighera wrote: How Beat The High Cost Of Fuel The motor is powered by a 78 pound, custom-built lithium-ion polymer battery with a power output of "5.6 kilowatt hours"; projected life is 300 to 500 full discharge cycles or more than 1,000 partial cycles. The battery can be recharged in as little as two hours using a 220-volt charger (or six hours with a 110-volt charger). The cost for a full recharge is 70 cents with the 110-volt charger. Fishman says it's feasible to carry a small 110-volt charger as baggage on cross-country flights. 1 horsepower = .75kw. So 5.6 kilowatt hours is only 7.51 horsepower hours. Good enough for a short burst to get you to altitude and soar the thermals, bu you aren't going anywhere cross country. I would say that depends on how much power the aircraft requires for sustained level flight. If that can be achieved on 5 hp, the battery will theoretically provide 1.5 hours run time (assuming 100% efficiency). Compare it to a really inefficient 2 stroke, burning .6 lb/hp-hr. Your battery is equal to .75 gallons of gas. What is the difference in cost between that amount of fuel and the cost to charger the battery? Noise? Vibration? Reliability? ... I give Mr. Fishman credit for the success his project has achieved to date considering its funding and staff. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Riley wrote:
On Jun 16, 7:37 pm, Larry Dighera wrote: How Beat The High Cost Of Fuel The motor is powered by a 78 pound, custom-built lithium-ion polymer battery with a power output of "5.6 kilowatt hours"; projected life is 300 to 500 full discharge cycles or more than 1,000 partial cycles. The battery can be recharged in as little as two hours using a 220-volt charger (or six hours with a 110-volt charger). The cost for a full recharge is 70 cents with the 110-volt charger. Fishman says it's feasible to carry a small 110-volt charger as baggage on cross-country flights. 1 horsepower = .75kw. So 5.6 kilowatt hours is only 7.51 horsepower hours. Good enough for a short burst to get you to altitude and soar the thermals, bu you aren't going anywhere cross country. Compare it to a really inefficient 2 stroke, burning .6 lb/hp-hr. Your battery is equal to .75 gallons of gas. Wait a second...5.6 KWH doesn't really tell you how much HP it is, does it? All it says is that it consumes 5.6KW in an hour. If you only ran the motor for 5 minutes per hours, the HP would be 12 times that or approx. 90 HP. Using KW HOURS doesn't tell the whole story. Running a 100W light bulb 10 hours uses 1 KWH and so does running a 500W bulb for 2 hours but the 500W bulb does more work at any instant in time (it's a lot brighter!). Now, if that motor was rated at 5.6KW, then yes, I'd agree it is about 7.5 HP. Scott |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 22, 9:20 am, Scott wrote:
Richard Riley wrote: On Jun 16, 7:37 pm, Larry Dighera wrote: How Beat The High Cost Of Fuel The motor is powered by a 78 pound, custom-built lithium-ion polymer battery with a power output of "5.6 kilowatt hours"; projected life is 300 to 500 full discharge cycles or more than 1,000 partial cycles. The battery can be recharged in as little as two hours using a 220-volt charger (or six hours with a 110-volt charger). The cost for a full recharge is 70 cents with the 110-volt charger. Fishman says it's feasible to carry a small 110-volt charger as baggage on cross-country flights. 1 horsepower = .75kw. So 5.6 kilowatt hours is only 7.51 horsepower hours. Good enough for a short burst to get you to altitude and soar the thermals, bu you aren't going anywhere cross country. Compare it to a really inefficient 2 stroke, burning .6 lb/hp-hr. Your battery is equal to .75 gallons of gas. Wait a second...5.6 KWH doesn't really tell you how much HP it is, does it? All it says is that it consumes 5.6KW in an hour. If you only ran the motor for 5 minutes per hours, the HP would be 12 times that or approx. 90 HP. Using KW HOURS doesn't tell the whole story. Running a 100W light bulb 10 hours uses 1 KWH and so does running a 500W bulb for 2 hours but the 500W bulb does more work at any instant in time (it's a lot brighter!). Now, if that motor was rated at 5.6KW, then yes, I'd agree it is about 7.5 HP. Scott True, KWH is a measure of energy, whereas HP (and KW) is a measure of power. Of course, this makes me wonder why the OP said the battery has a "power output" of 5.6KWH; that statement doesn't make any sense. Granted, he was obviously talking about the capacity of the battery, not the power output, but if somebody is making an electric plane one would hope they would know their terminology ![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott wrote:
Richard Riley wrote: On Jun 16, 7:37 pm, Larry Dighera wrote: How Beat The High Cost Of Fuel The motor is powered by a 78 pound, custom-built lithium-ion polymer battery with a power output of "5.6 kilowatt hours"; projected life is 300 to 500 full discharge cycles or more than 1,000 partial cycles. The battery can be recharged in as little as two hours using a 220-volt charger (or six hours with a 110-volt charger). The cost for a full recharge is 70 cents with the 110-volt charger. Fishman says it's feasible to carry a small 110-volt charger as baggage on cross-country flights. 1 horsepower = .75kw. So 5.6 kilowatt hours is only 7.51 horsepower hours. Good enough for a short burst to get you to altitude and soar the thermals, bu you aren't going anywhere cross country. Compare it to a really inefficient 2 stroke, burning .6 lb/hp-hr. Your battery is equal to .75 gallons of gas. Wait a second...5.6 KWH doesn't really tell you how much HP it is, does it? All it says is that it consumes 5.6KW in an hour. If you only ran the motor for 5 minutes per hours, the HP would be 12 times that or approx. 90 HP. Using KW HOURS doesn't tell the whole story. Running a 100W light bulb 10 hours uses 1 KWH and so does running a 500W bulb for 2 hours but the 500W bulb does more work at any instant in time (it's a lot brighter!). Now, if that motor was rated at 5.6KW, then yes, I'd agree it is about 7.5 HP. Scott The OP stated the motor was 18 H.P. "This year Fishman hopes to fly his new ElectraFlyer-C (a re-engined Moni motorglider with an 18-horsepower electric motor)..." |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Scott" wrote in message ... Richard Riley wrote: On Jun 16, 7:37 pm, Larry Dighera wrote: How Beat The High Cost Of Fuel The motor is powered by a 78 pound, custom-built lithium-ion polymer battery with a power output of "5.6 kilowatt hours"; projected life is 300 to 500 full discharge cycles or more than 1,000 partial cycles. The battery can be recharged in as little as two hours using a 220-volt charger (or six hours with a 110-volt charger). The cost for a full recharge is 70 cents with the 110-volt charger. Fishman says it's feasible to carry a small 110-volt charger as baggage on cross-country flights. 1 horsepower = .75kw. So 5.6 kilowatt hours is only 7.51 horsepower hours. Good enough for a short burst to get you to altitude and soar the thermals, bu you aren't going anywhere cross country. Compare it to a really inefficient 2 stroke, burning .6 lb/hp-hr. Your battery is equal to .75 gallons of gas. Wait a second...5.6 KWH doesn't really tell you how much HP it is, does it? All it says is that it consumes 5.6KW in an hour. If you only ran the motor for 5 minutes per hours, the HP would be 12 times that or approx. 90 HP. Using KW HOURS doesn't tell the whole story. Running a 100W light bulb 10 hours uses 1 KWH and so does running a 500W bulb for 2 hours but the 500W bulb does more work at any instant in time (it's a lot brighter!). Now, if that motor was rated at 5.6KW, then yes, I'd agree it is about 7.5 HP. Scott You have a good point, but the KW Hours rating of the battery does seem a bit low. Even when you consider that cooling drag nearly absent, what little I think I know about the base airframe suggests that the battery rating needs to be at least twice the stated amount in order to provide the stated performance and endurance. The usual power of ten error in transcription does not make much sense in this case, but there are apparently two batteries of equal sive--and everything that I could find appeared to originate from a single article. In any case, it is interesting; but the economics really do not work based upon the stated maximum10 year and 1000 hour battery battery life. Even if the electricity was free and gasolene was more than twice its current cost, the gasolene powered airplane, on which it is bsed, would still give much greated utility for less cost. Nontheless, my hat's off to him for the effort. Peter |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 21, 11:42 pm, Richard Riley wrote:
On Jun 16, 7:37 pm, Larry Dighera wrote: How Beat The High Cost Of Fuel The motor is powered by a 78 pound, custom-built lithium-ion polymer battery with a power output of "5.6 kilowatt hours"; projected life is 300 to 500 full discharge cycles or more than 1,000 partial cycles. The battery can be recharged in as little as two hours using a 220-volt charger (or six hours with a 110-volt charger). The cost for a full recharge is 70 cents with the 110-volt charger. Fishman says it's feasible to carry a small 110-volt charger as baggage on cross-country flights. 1 horsepower = .75kw. So 5.6 kilowatt hours is only 7.51 horsepower hours. Good enough for a short burst to get you to altitude and soar the thermals, bu you aren't going anywhere cross country. Compare it to a really inefficient 2 stroke, burning .6 lb/hp-hr. Your battery is equal to .75 gallons of gas. The technology is immature, but this is on the right track. When a suitable battery is invented, there is no arguing that it will easily replace small gasoline engines. And battery development is just getting started, so things can only get better. We have not invested in batteries other than for portable electronics. I am sure many in 1903 argued that a horse drawn carriage could go much farther and safer than the Wright flyer. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In rec.aviation.piloting Andrew Sarangan wrote:
On Jun 21, 11:42 pm, Richard Riley wrote: On Jun 16, 7:37 pm, Larry Dighera wrote: How Beat The High Cost Of Fuel The motor is powered by a 78 pound, custom-built lithium-ion polymer battery with a power output of "5.6 kilowatt hours"; projected life is 300 to 500 full discharge cycles or more than 1,000 partial cycles. The battery can be recharged in as little as two hours using a 220-volt charger (or six hours with a 110-volt charger). The cost for a full recharge is 70 cents with the 110-volt charger. Fishman says it's feasible to carry a small 110-volt charger as baggage on cross-country flights. 1 horsepower = .75kw. So 5.6 kilowatt hours is only 7.51 horsepower hours. Good enough for a short burst to get you to altitude and soar the thermals, bu you aren't going anywhere cross country. Compare it to a really inefficient 2 stroke, burning .6 lb/hp-hr. Your battery is equal to .75 gallons of gas. The technology is immature, but this is on the right track. When a suitable battery is invented, there is no arguing that it will easily replace small gasoline engines. And when fustion reactors are invented they will replace coal and fission plants. And when anti-gravity is invented, it will replace airplanes. And when... And battery development is just getting started, so things can only get better. Batteries have been under development for well over a hundred years. We have not invested in batteries other than for portable electronics. What do you think powered ALL the world's submerged submarines before the Nautilus was launched in 1954? What do you think powers the stuff in torpedoes and missiles and has for about a half century, an extension cord? Have you any idea what has powered telephone offices for over a century? Do you know what a UPS is and have you ever seen one the size of a small house? I am sure many in 1903 argued that a horse drawn carriage could go much farther and safer than the Wright flyer. In 1903 both the airplane and the car were new; it is now 105 years later. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How Beat The High Cost Of Fuel: The ElectraFlyer-C | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 71 | June 26th 08 05:45 PM |
Fighting the high cost of flying | Jay Honeck[_2_] | Piloting | 31 | June 11th 08 11:30 AM |
High Cost of Sportplanes | Gordon Arnaut | Home Built | 110 | November 18th 05 10:02 AM |
Fix the high cost [Was:] High Cost of Sportplanes | Evan Carew | Home Built | 40 | October 8th 05 04:05 AM |
These are not YOUR airplanes - Was: High Cost of Sportplanes | Lakeview Bill | Home Built | 28 | September 21st 05 01:37 PM |