![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There were some interesting articles this past week. First one is
"New, Stealthy Aircraft Eyed for Special Ops Forces". According to Janes this offering is apparently coming out of a classified initiative: http://www.janes.com/defence/air_for...0217_1_n.shtml Dubbed "MACK" for M-X; A-X; a regular airlifter, C-X; and a future tanker, K-X, it is being offered up for AFSOC use. It is also being considered for a stealthy penetrating tanker role (ASWT Feb 23): "Moreover, U.S. Air Force representatives have indicated interest in a stealthy tanker to support their stealthy attack platforms, the F/A-22, F-35 and B-2, to make them less susceptible to attack while they refuel. To adequately satisfy that demand, Lockheed Martin has devised a stealth shrouding for the refueling "boom." With the 767 deal all but dead...: http://www.ddn.com/ "Going, Going, Gone? Even Wall Street seems to be getting a bit tired of the Air Force's protracted plans to acquire 100 KC-767 tankers from Boeing. A Morgan Stanley analyst writes in a recent report that reports of further delays--and even cancellation--are likely true. But that's just as well, the analyst writes. "The tanker deal was becoming so wrought with additional baggage that the deal was looking less and less likely to occur, in our view," according to the report. "Frankly, we believe it would be better for [Boeing] if the deal died sooner rather than later given the company is expending about $90 [million]/Qtr on the deal."...And the number one priority of Boeing in recent years has been to listen to Wall Street. ....Boeing is getting into the act as well with their Blended Wing Body concept(AWST Feb23): "Boeing is also pushing the BWB concept for a potential air refueling tanker, which would be able to carry massive amounts of fuel and provide two permanent boom refueling stations, rather than one as in the KC-135, KC-10 or KC-767." "Boeing doesn't have any other aircraft to use for that purpose once the 767 line shuts down. To achieve the efficiency goals the company is touting for the 7E7, engineers are making structural trade-offs that mean the airliner can't be converted into a tanker, according to several Boeing officials." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Which GPS Support LNAV/VNAV? | C Kingsbury | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | October 23rd 04 12:28 AM |
24/7 computer tech support | [email protected] | Home Built | 0 | May 5th 04 03:32 AM |
USAFE commander: 86th Airlift Wing will divide for combat, support operations | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | November 27th 03 11:31 PM |
[AU] Defence support for Bush visit | David Bromage | Military Aviation | 7 | October 23rd 03 05:04 AM |
Hurt pilots form a support group at Fort Campbell | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | August 24th 03 11:57 PM |