A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » Aviation Images » Aviation Photos
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

R/C Flying, pt 3 - Junkers 52.jpg (1/1)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 4th 08, 12:11 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Mitchell Holman Mitchell Holman is offline
Banned
 
First recorded activity by AviationBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,194
Default R/C Flying, pt 3 - Junkers 52.jpg (1/1)




Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Junkers 52.jpg
Views:	120
Size:	44.4 KB
ID:	26783  
  #2  
Old July 4th 08, 02:53 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Alan Erskine[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 621
Default R/C Flying, pt 3 - Junkers 52.jpg (1/1)

"Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
...

Superb! Only thing; I thought the Ju52 had three-bladed props. Other than
that, it's an excellent model.


  #3  
Old July 4th 08, 05:20 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Mitchell Holman Mitchell Holman is offline
Banned
 
First recorded activity by AviationBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,194
Default R/C Flying, pt 3 - Junkers 52.jpg (1/1)

"Alan Erskine" wrote in
:

"Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
...

Superb! Only thing; I thought the Ju52 had three-bladed props. Other
than that, it's an excellent model.


The models of the Corsair and the Avenger also have
two-bladed props instead of three. Must be an R/C thing.


  #4  
Old July 4th 08, 07:30 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Waldo.Pepper[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 234
Default R/C Flying, pt 3 - Junkers 52.jpg (1/1)

Often it all depends on the engine. More powerful engine, more blades.

Here is a Tante Ju with two blade props.

http://cdn-www.airliners.net/aviatio.../7/1365704.jpg

Waldo.


On Fri, 04 Jul 2008 13:53:51 GMT, "Alan Erskine"
wrote:

Superb! Only thing; I thought the Ju52 had three-bladed props. Other than
that, it's an excellent model.


  #5  
Old July 5th 08, 07:22 AM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Alan Erskine[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 621
Default R/C Flying, pt 3 - Junkers 52.jpg (1/1)

"Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
...
"Alan Erskine" wrote in
:

"Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
...

Superb! Only thing; I thought the Ju52 had three-bladed props. Other
than that, it's an excellent model.


The models of the Corsair and the Avenger also have
two-bladed props instead of three. Must be an R/C thing.


I thought it might be an 'engine thing'. Thanks Mitchell and Waldo.


  #6  
Old July 5th 08, 08:18 AM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Guybrush Threepwood[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 26
Default R/C Flying, pt 3 - Junkers 52.jpg (1/1)

"Waldo.Pepper" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
...
Often it all depends on the engine. More powerful engine, more blades.

Here is a Tante Ju with two blade props.

http://cdn-www.airliners.net/aviatio.../7/1365704.jpg

Waldo.


On Fri, 04 Jul 2008 13:53:51 GMT, "Alan Erskine"
wrote:

Superb! Only thing; I thought the Ju52 had three-bladed props. Other
than
that, it's an excellent model.




Most of the JU52/3M were built with either BMW or Pratt & Whittney engines.
The BMW version has originally two blade props and the P&W version has 3
blade props.
The P&W engines are providing more power, therefore, as mentioned above the
need for 3 blade probs.
But the sound is not the same....:-)

--
Gruß Guybrush

  #7  
Old July 5th 08, 12:38 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Richard[_7_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 68
Default R/C Flying, pt 3 - Junkers 52.jpg (1/1)

Did the Germans just buy the P&W's or did they manufacture them in Germany?


Most of the JU52/3M were built with either BMW or Pratt & Whittney
engines. The BMW version has originally two blade props and the P&W
version has 3 blade props.
The P&W engines are providing more power, therefore, as mentioned above
the need for 3 blade probs.
But the sound is not the same....:-)

--
Gruß Guybrush



  #8  
Old July 6th 08, 09:26 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
D. St-Sanvain
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,479
Default R/C Flying, pt 3 - Junkers 52.jpg (1/1)

Hello;

Alan Erskine a écrit :
Superb! Only thing; I thought the Ju52 had three-bladed props. Other than
that, it's an excellent model.


Here's view of two different propellers sets :
http://www.warbirdz.net/largepic.php?ID=2365

Bye


  #9  
Old July 7th 08, 12:40 AM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Herman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 260
Default R/C Flying, pt 3 - Junkers 52.jpg (1/1)


"D. St-Sanvain" schreef in bericht
...
Hello;

Alan Erskine a écrit :
Superb! Only thing; I thought the Ju52 had three-bladed props. Other
than that, it's an excellent model.


Here's view of two different propellers sets :
http://www.warbirdz.net/largepic.php?ID=2365

Bye


I thought most wartime Ju-52/3m's had 2-bladed props.
Possibly CASA examples or other post war aircraft (with different engines)
had 3-bladed props to cope with increased power.

Regards,
Herman


  #10  
Old July 7th 08, 03:48 AM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Morgans[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,924
Default R/C Flying, pt 3 - Junkers 52.jpg (1/1)

I thought most wartime Ju-52/3m's had 2-bladed props.
Possibly CASA examples or other post war aircraft (with different engines)
had 3-bladed props to cope with increased power.


Long to short, what most people are discussing is whether the RC models had
the correct historic prop on them. What may be going on is what is
necessary for models to work well, not the ignoring of the proper props. g

When RC planes are done to high levels of historic accuracy, still, the
props are many times the wrong number of blades or the wrong diameter. When
it is being displayed, a historically accurate prop is put on, then changed
out before flying.

Reynolds numbers, and scalability of areas and weight does not allow most
engines to operate with a correct prop, unless luck comes to play, or some
extra complexity (gearing) comes into the application.

A 2 blade prop is more efficient than a 3 blade, and a 3 blade better than a
4 blade. Full sized Reynolds numbers don't hurt full sized applications as
much as it hurts model sized props. Still, the fact remains that 3 and 4
blade (and sometimes more) props are needed to harness the huge power
outputs of the full sized engines, without getting the diameter overly
large.

So, I guess what I am try to say, for those that are not very familiar with
RC scale planes, the builder was probably not ignoring what prop was used
for the full sized plane, but was just doing what he needed to do to have
maximum power output harnessed from the engine that was being used.

That's my take, anywho! g
--
Jim in NC


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MAE : Junkers D1 jmp Aviation Photos 0 February 25th 08 08:43 PM
Ju 88 - Junkers Ju-88A.jpg (1/1) Mitchell Holman Aviation Photos 0 January 8th 08 12:53 PM
Winter Flying, pt 3 - Junkers W-34.jpg (1/1) Mitchell Holman[_2_] Aviation Photos 0 February 1st 07 01:34 PM
Winter Flying, pt 3 - Junkers W34f.jpg (1/1) Mitchell Holman[_2_] Aviation Photos 0 February 1st 07 01:34 PM
Winter Flying, pt 3 - Junkers Stukas und Lufttranspoter 7-10.jpg (1/1) Mitchell Holman[_2_] Aviation Photos 0 February 1st 07 01:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.