![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you've read the latest 'Sport Aviation' you were no doubt impressed
by the 'New Engines for Experimental Aircraft' (page 35). The infomercial shows a few engines with prices starting at about ten grand, topping out at more than $50k, chump change for all those folks dedicated to revitalizing grass-roots aviation in America. For a whiff of reality, go over to GM's industrial engine page and take a look at their V2400. In fact, don't just take a look at it, figure out some way to get your hands on one. Now turn it upside down and call me on the phone. Once we have the thing running inverted we'll figure out how to fabricate a carbon-fiber sump and valve cover. Carbon-fiber because the alternative is cast aluminum and odds are, we don't have the required depth of machining talent to produce a finished product from a raw casting (although the guys did exactly that for the O-290-G back in John Thorpe's day). With carbon-fiber we can fabricate the things locally. What do we get for our trouble? A 75hp water-cooled engine that produces those 75 horses at an rpm suitable for twirling a prop. What do we do with it? We put it in a Pietenpol. Or any other low- tech, two-seater. (Why invert it? Because that puts the thrust-line in the proper place without filling your forward vision with cylinder heads and radiators.) Is it expensive? Probably. It's being manufactured in Brazil and the way our Bail-Out Bucks are depreciating, we are well on our way to becoming a Third World Nation. But it's an INDUSTRIAL engine, meaning there's going to be a lot of them available. Inverting an engine is fairly common in aviation; there's some tricks to it but no mysteries. Why the Pietenpol? Well... why NOT? It's a proven design and the weight of the V2400 is close to that of the Model A. It's a two- seater, which is almost a necessity if you want to stimulate grass- roots aviation, and its fabrication calls for only a modest level of skills. Indeed, if you participate in building a Primary Glider you will have experienced virtually all of the skills needed to build a Piet. Food for thought. -R.S.Hoover |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[09/12] - P-38 starboard engine detail.JPG (1/1) Part 3 | Waldo.Pepper[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 2 | September 12th 08 04:46 PM |
Saturn V F-1 Engine Testing at F-1 Engine Test Stand 6866986.jpg | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 1 | April 11th 07 04:48 PM |
F-1 Engine for the Saturn V S-IC (first) stage depicts the complexity of the engine 6413912.jpg | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 0 | April 9th 07 01:38 PM |
New Engine on New homebuilt | David Koehler | Home Built | 19 | August 14th 05 09:30 PM |
wanted: flying homebuilt w/auto engine | AINut | Home Built | 0 | January 19th 05 03:06 AM |