A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The Homebuilt Engine, Part 1



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old September 20th 08, 02:32 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 472
Default The Homebuilt Engine, Part 1

If you've read the latest 'Sport Aviation' you were no doubt impressed
by the 'New Engines for Experimental Aircraft' (page 35). The
infomercial shows a few engines with prices starting at about ten
grand, topping out at more than $50k, chump change for all those folks
dedicated to revitalizing grass-roots aviation in America.

For a whiff of reality, go over to GM's industrial engine page and
take a look at their V2400. In fact, don't just take a look at it,
figure out some way to get your hands on one.

Now turn it upside down and call me on the phone.

Once we have the thing running inverted we'll figure out how to
fabricate a carbon-fiber sump and valve cover. Carbon-fiber because
the alternative is cast aluminum and odds are, we don't have the
required depth of machining talent to produce a finished product from
a raw casting (although the guys did exactly that for the O-290-G back
in John Thorpe's day). With carbon-fiber we can fabricate the things
locally.

What do we get for our trouble? A 75hp water-cooled engine that
produces those 75 horses at an rpm suitable for twirling a prop.

What do we do with it? We put it in a Pietenpol. Or any other low-
tech, two-seater.

(Why invert it? Because that puts the thrust-line in the proper place
without filling your forward vision with cylinder heads and
radiators.)

Is it expensive? Probably. It's being manufactured in Brazil and the
way our Bail-Out Bucks are depreciating, we are well on our way to
becoming a Third World Nation. But it's an INDUSTRIAL engine, meaning
there's going to be a lot of them available.

Inverting an engine is fairly common in aviation; there's some tricks
to it but no mysteries.

Why the Pietenpol? Well... why NOT? It's a proven design and the
weight of the V2400 is close to that of the Model A. It's a two-
seater, which is almost a necessity if you want to stimulate grass-
roots aviation, and its fabrication calls for only a modest level of
skills. Indeed, if you participate in building a Primary Glider you
will have experienced virtually all of the skills needed to build a
Piet.

Food for thought.

-R.S.Hoover
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[09/12] - P-38 starboard engine detail.JPG (1/1) Part 3 Waldo.Pepper[_2_] Aviation Photos 2 September 12th 08 04:46 PM
Saturn V F-1 Engine Testing at F-1 Engine Test Stand 6866986.jpg [email protected] Aviation Photos 1 April 11th 07 04:48 PM
F-1 Engine for the Saturn V S-IC (first) stage depicts the complexity of the engine 6413912.jpg [email protected] Aviation Photos 0 April 9th 07 01:38 PM
New Engine on New homebuilt David Koehler Home Built 19 August 14th 05 09:30 PM
wanted: flying homebuilt w/auto engine AINut Home Built 0 January 19th 05 03:06 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.