![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was reviewing some contest flights from 2008 and it occurred to me
that there hadn't been a thorough review of people's experience with the new "start anywhere" rule - which measures distance on the first leg from a start from anywhere along the boundries of the start cylinder. I general I prefer it to the old rule, but it seems to put more pressure on getting the perfect start. I found myself popping the brakes and going down for a lot more starts than in prior years. At Parowan a few of us lobbied for and got a higher MSH to keep people out of the weeds when going back down for another start in the high ground east of the field (where most of the good thermals were). Any other reactions out there? 9B |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FSX Start Up | L D S | Simulators | 1 | November 21st 07 11:06 PM |
SR-71 61-7974, engine start - "61-7974 engine start, Jan 16, 1984, Ramstein AB, Scott R Wilson.jpg" 176.9 KBytes | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 7 | November 3rd 07 01:14 PM |
SR-71 61-7974, engine start - "61-7974 engine start, Jan 16, 1984, Ramstein AB, Scott R Wilson.jpg" 176.9 KBytes | [email protected] | Piloting | 4 | November 3rd 07 01:14 PM |
Going IFR from the start | Dylan Smith | Piloting | 9 | May 23rd 05 11:47 PM |
I want to start | Carlos Estopier | Owning | 16 | May 12th 04 07:09 PM |