![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 17 May 2004 10:33:50 -0400, "Jeff" wrote:
OH-58A/C Kiowa, OH-58D Kiowa (slick, like in "Firebirds"), AHIP, AH-58D, OH-58D(i) Kiowa Warrior, OH-58D(R) Kiowa Warrior, then after all OH-58A/C/D's were upgraded to (i) or (R), the (i)'s went back to just "OH-58D" and the (R)'s (R3 engine) stayed (R)'s. I know there are now more upgrades and improvements and I think most D's will become R's. There was a battle of "intents" over this. Some thought that the AH-attack would cause commanders to think of KW's light attack a/c and use them more offensively (and lead to losses) which it is not designed for as opposed to the OH-observation role and armed simply to defend itself. The Hellfire stretched this to allow for long range high priority target engagements but the overriding wisdom was to characterize this a/c as a snoop and poop platform. Apaches have enough problems from small arms ground fire, can you image KW's getting hit with the same? (Think about the ambush on two Apache Bn's in Iraq several weeks ago. I believe it was 20+-some birds grounded due to battle damage and the mission was scrubbed. KW's would have augered in right there, with their crews.) Apaches are designed to bring their crews home after getting hit. KW's won't. In my book I'd say that it's not an official designation change until the central aircraft database reflects it, regardless of whatever a lone TM says or internal unit documentation calls it. Based on that I'd say there were never any "official" AH-58s - the people who keep track of the aircraft inventory always had them as OH-58s. And, having seen one up close, it's data block stencil said "OH-58D", not "AH-58D". As another example, until the MH-60K came along, none of the MH-60A/Ls that the 160th SOAR had were listed as MH-60s in the official database records, i.e. if it's modified from its original form, the odds are it won't get officially re-designated, but if it's contracted for and comes from the factory that way, that's what goes into the database. The AH-60s weren't "official" either. John Hairell ) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 40 | October 3rd 08 03:13 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 4 | August 7th 03 05:12 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 04:50 PM |