![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is an article in this month of "Business & Commercial Aviation"
regarding lightning. It says that in 1999, a ASK21 desintegrated large sections of the fuselage, while flying in clear air, about 800 yards from a cloud. Both pilots were ejected from the strike, but fortunately were wearing parachutes. The same article goes on to say fiberglass, especially carbon fiber is conductive. So if you are on the ground and a thunderstorm is over the airport, to seek shelter inside a building and NOT inside the glider which has no protection. Has nayone heard this before? Do you know someone who had a lightning strike in a glider before? I am just curious as I never heard of this before. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "jeplane" wrote in message ups.com... The same article goes on to say fiberglass, especially carbon fiber is conductive. So if you are on the ground and a thunderstorm is over the airport, to seek shelter inside a building and NOT inside the glider which has no protection. I have real problems with this statement. Caught in a storm, I would want the most conductive shell possible around my vulnerable, conductive body. I would think that an aluminum airframe, being highly conductive, would be perfect. I thought that the problem with fiberglass was that it was not sufficiently conductive, which can lead to instantaneous overheating and in-flight structural destruction. Vaughn |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I witnessed this accident in which a London Gliding Club K21 was destroyed
in mid-air by what was later found to be an exceptionally powerful lightning strike. Indeed, the strike was many times more powerful than the most energetic that commercial aircraft designers typically allow for when specifying composite components for their aircraft. The pupil, who was a member of the public on a one day gliding course, parachuted out successfully, while the instructor suffered minor injuries on landing from the jump. He was back flying a few weeks later, none the worse for wear, and continues to fly at the club. The lightning entered one wing of the glider at roughly the point where the aileron actuator connects to the aileron, and exited from approximately the corresponding location on the other wing. The effect was to drive an immense electrical current though the metal push-rods and other metal fittings in the fuselage, some of which were vaporised, or else melted and severely distorted. The effect of this current was to generate a massive amount of heat which caused the explosive expansion of the air inside the wings. This stripped the skin off a large part of the wings which, of course, are not designed to withstand loads that are essentially trying to inflate the wing from within and peel the skin away from the spar. The UK Air Accident Investigation Branch took a considerable interest in this event, not least because a senior investigator happens to be a member of London Gliding Club and an extremely detailed analysis was published by them later. This includes a fascinating account of the mechanism of lightning strikes on aircraft. The UK AAIB report can be found he http://www.aaib.dft.gov.uk/cms_resou...pdf_500699.pdf. The accident also attracted the attention of various airlines and aircraft manufacturers who were interested in the implications for composite components of commercial airframes. Contrary to jeplane's quote from Business & Commercial Aviation, the AAIB report specifically says (in referring to GRP with foam or honeycomb filled sections bonded together) that "These materials are electrically non-conductive." Later on it says "In aircraft or gliders constructed from a non-conducting material such as GRP, the lightning arc is likely to attach to the extremities of any linked conducting components within that structure". It was very clear from the AAIB examination of the glider that it was the electrical conduction through the metal parts, and not through the skin that caused the aircraft to disintegrate as a result of the events I have described above. David Starer "jeplane" wrote in message ups.com... There is an article in this month of "Business & Commercial Aviation" regarding lightning. It says that in 1999, a ASK21 desintegrated large sections of the fuselage, while flying in clear air, about 800 yards from a cloud. Both pilots were ejected from the strike, but fortunately were wearing parachutes. The same article goes on to say fiberglass, especially carbon fiber is conductive. So if you are on the ground and a thunderstorm is over the airport, to seek shelter inside a building and NOT inside the glider which has no protection. Has nayone heard this before? Do you know someone who had a lightning strike in a glider before? I am just curious as I never heard of this before. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . com,
jeplane writes There is an article in this month of "Business & Commercial Aviation" regarding lightning. It says that in 1999, a ASK21 desintegrated large sections of the fuselage, while flying in clear air, about 800 yards from a cloud. Both pilots were ejected from the strike, but fortunately were wearing parachutes. The same article goes on to say fiberglass, especially carbon fiber is conductive. So if you are on the ground and a thunderstorm is over the airport, to seek shelter inside a building and NOT inside the glider which has no protection. Has nayone heard this before? Do you know someone who had a lightning strike in a glider before? I am just curious as I never heard of this before. I would have thought that if fibreglass was conductive it would protect you from the Thunder God. But it isn't, at least not to the extent that it could carry the heavy current a lightening strike produces without getting hot enough to disintegrate. The K21 which was destroyed near the London Gliding Club's Dunstable site had some control rods which took so much current they more or less exploded, much like a fuse wire when it takes about 50 times it's rated load. This explosion blew the skin off the wings. I once read a book about a glider which fell apart in a Cu-nim in Germany, the pilot was killed because his parachute carried him up to even higher levels. But I don't know if this was due to lightening, or over-stressing the airframe. I believe this happened in about 1928. I wish I could remember the name of the book and its author, it was what got me into gliding in the first place. -- Mike Lindsay |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
we know that GRP (glass fibre) has a low conductivity, is carbon fibre as low?
My understanding was the glues and surrounds of the fibres are the problem, the varios fibres themselves act as a lightglobe type resistor, rapidly heating, then the resins go booooomph. Any experts? bagger |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I live in the lightning capital of the world, Central Florida. I am
not aware of any incidents here but I think we all pretty much give the old CuNims a wide margin. I have seen bolts strike out and away from thunderstorm cells by at least several miles. I believe up to 10 miles would not be too rare. If a nasty one was very near at all, I would get down. Craig |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 14, 5:26 pm, Mike Lindsay wrote:
In article . com, jeplane writes There is an article in this month of "Business & Commercial Aviation" regarding lightning. It says that in 1999, a ASK21 desintegrated large sections of the fuselage, while flying in clear air, about 800 yards from a cloud. Both pilots were ejected from the strike, but fortunately were wearing parachutes. The same article goes on to say fiberglass, especially carbon fiber is conductive. So if you are on the ground and a thunderstorm is over the airport, to seek shelter inside a building and NOT inside the glider which has no protection. Has nayone heard this before? Do you know someone who had a lightning strike in a glider before? I am just curious as I never heard of this before. I would have thought that if fibreglass was conductive it would protect you from the Thunder God. But it isn't, at least not to the extent that it could carry the heavy current a lightening strike produces without getting hot enough to disintegrate. The K21 which was destroyed near the London Gliding Club's Dunstable site had some control rods which took so much current they more or less exploded, much like a fuse wire when it takes about 50 times it's rated load. This explosion blew the skin off the wings. I once read a book about a glider which fell apart in a Cu-nim in Germany, the pilot was killed because his parachute carried him up to even higher levels. But I don't know if this was due to lightening, or over-stressing the airframe. I believe this happened in about 1928. I wish I could remember the name of the book and its author, it was what got me into gliding in the first place. -- Mike Lindsay I too live in Central Florida, where overdevelopment and heavy T- storms are common during the summer months. The power pilots will tell you to avoid a convective cloud by 10 miles for every 10,000 ft of cloud tops. I use a simpler formula, if I can't see the sun because a cloud is blotting it out I go inside and play X-box. N |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The Beech Starship (composite business turbo prop - RIP) had a copper mesh layer between the layers of fiber glass precisely for lightning protection. I'm reasonably certain that other like (and larger) aircraft do too. Tony V. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tony Verhulst" wrote in message . .. The Beech Starship (composite business turbo prop - RIP) had a copper mesh layer between the layers of fiber glass precisely for lightning protection. I'm reasonably certain that other like (and larger) aircraft do too. Tony V. That's true. Years ago I saw video of "test" lightning strikes (nowhere near as strong as the real thing) on unprotected GRP composite material and composite with mesh, done by either Glasair or Lancair. The difference in size and impact of the damaged area was dramatic. Without the mesh the hole in the wing was very big. Without the mesh is was just big. If being zapped, I'd rather be in an aluminum skinned plane. I understand that carbon fiber explodes when struck even without metal control rods to heat up and expand the air within the wing. The carbon does a fine job of heating and turning moisture into steam bumper |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Wasn't there a two-place glider in England destroyed in the air by a lightening strike? I recall control rods in the wing fused and the fibreglass "exploded" Both aboard succssfully bailed out -- the passenger was on his first ride but had been briefed. Good thing, eh? "Tony Verhulst" wrote in message ... The Beech Starship (composite business turbo prop - RIP) had a copper mesh layer between the layers of fiber glass precisely for lightning protection. I'm reasonably certain that other like (and larger) aircraft do too. Tony V. That's true. Years ago I saw video of "test" lightning strikes (nowhere near as strong as the real thing) on unprotected GRP composite material and composite with mesh, done by either Glasair or Lancair. The difference in size and impact of the damaged area was dramatic. Without the mesh the hole in the wing was very big. Without the mesh is was just big. If being zapped, I'd rather be in an aluminum skinned plane. I understand that carbon fiber explodes when struck even without metal control rods to heat up and expand the air within the wing. The carbon does a fine job of heating and turning moisture into steam bumper -- Charles Yeates ZS Jezow Agent - PW-6/PW-5 CMYeates & Associates 105 Dunbrack St, Apt 110 Halifax, NS, Canada, B3M 3G7 tel/fax 902.443.0094 Web site http://www3.ns.sympatico.ca/yeatesc/world.html |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lightning anyone? | Frode Berg | Piloting | 11 | May 16th 09 05:04 PM |
F-35 Lightning II | No Name | Aviation Photos | 4 | December 16th 06 11:49 PM |
ASK21 vs G103 | solo89 | Soaring | 13 | October 23rd 03 07:15 PM |