![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've been kicking this idea around with some mechanical engineers for
a couple of years. Motorcycle in-line fours are state of the art high performance engines unencumbered by smog controls. They get more than 100HP per liter with some at 140 HP/liter. Of course, they rev like a dentist's drill. More importantly, the cylinder/head assembly just bolts to the crankcase. Now, think of 7 or 9 of these in-line water cooled 4-cyl blocks arranged radially around a common crankcase. To make it work, you have to make the case, crank and new master/ articulating connecting rods. You'd also need a gear case to drive the cam chains. Finally, you'd need some serious gear reduction (~7:1) planetary gear set in the nose case. I'd also use an aircraft- type fuel injection system instead of carbs. If it worked, in the case of 9 cylinder blocks, you'd have a 36 cylinder, 500 pound, 30" diameter, 1000HP+ liquid cooled radial reminiscent of a half scale Lycoming XR7755. Now build a slick little carbon composite airplane around the monster and take it to Reno. I'll bet the sound alone would wow the crowds. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
bildan wrote:
I've been kicking this idea around with some mechanical engineers for a couple of years. Motorcycle in-line fours are state of the art high performance engines unencumbered by smog controls. They get more than 100HP per liter with some at 140 HP/liter. Of course, they rev like a dentist's drill. More importantly, the cylinder/head assembly just bolts to the crankcase. Now, think of 7 or 9 of these in-line water cooled 4-cyl blocks arranged radially around a common crankcase. To make it work, you have to make the case, crank and new master/ articulating connecting rods. You'd also need a gear case to drive the cam chains. Finally, you'd need some serious gear reduction (~7:1) planetary gear set in the nose case. I'd also use an aircraft- type fuel injection system instead of carbs. If it worked, in the case of 9 cylinder blocks, you'd have a 36 cylinder, 500 pound, 30" diameter, 1000HP+ liquid cooled radial reminiscent of a half scale Lycoming XR7755. Now build a slick little carbon composite airplane around the monster and take it to Reno. I'll bet the sound alone would wow the crowds. Already been done. http://www.bigbikeriders.com/48cyl.htm -- John Kimmel I think it will be quiet around here now. So long. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 17, 10:05*am, John Kimmel wrote:
bildan wrote: I've been kicking this idea around with some mechanical engineers for a couple of years. Motorcycle in-line fours are state of the art high performance engines unencumbered by smog controls. *They get more than 100HP per liter with some at 140 HP/liter. *Of course, they rev like a dentist's drill. More importantly, the cylinder/head assembly just bolts to the crankcase. *Now, think of 7 or 9 of these in-line water cooled 4-cyl blocks arranged radially around a common crankcase. To make it work, you have to make the case, crank and new master/ articulating connecting rods. *You'd also need a gear case to drive the cam chains. *Finally, you'd need some serious gear reduction (~7:1) *planetary gear set in the nose case. *I'd also use an aircraft- type fuel injection system instead of carbs. If it worked, in the case of 9 cylinder blocks, you'd have a 36 cylinder, 500 pound, 30" diameter, 1000HP+ liquid cooled radial reminiscent of a half scale Lycoming XR7755. Now build a slick little carbon composite airplane around the monster and take it to Reno. *I'll bet the sound alone would wow the crowds. Already been done.http://www.bigbikeriders.com/48cyl.htm -- John Kimmel I think it will be quiet around here now. *So long. Actually, I think I made a mistake on the 30" diameter. I got that by measuring the distance from the crank center to the top of the valve covers of a Kawasaki. That's fine for a 4-cylinder but a radial is a different matter. To make room for 9 blocks and the intake/exhaust manifolds that go between them, the engine diameter would have to be larger. Maybe 42" - 48" diameter would work. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Kimmel wrote:
bildan wrote: I've been kicking this idea around with some mechanical engineers for a couple of years. Motorcycle in-line fours are state of the art high performance engines unencumbered by smog controls. They get more than 100HP per liter with some at 140 HP/liter. Of course, they rev like a dentist's drill. More importantly, the cylinder/head assembly just bolts to the crankcase. Now, think of 7 or 9 of these in-line water cooled 4-cyl blocks arranged radially around a common crankcase. To make it work, you have to make the case, crank and new master/ articulating connecting rods. You'd also need a gear case to drive the cam chains. Finally, you'd need some serious gear reduction (~7:1) planetary gear set in the nose case. I'd also use an aircraft- type fuel injection system instead of carbs. If it worked, in the case of 9 cylinder blocks, you'd have a 36 cylinder, 500 pound, 30" diameter, 1000HP+ liquid cooled radial reminiscent of a half scale Lycoming XR7755. Now build a slick little carbon composite airplane around the monster and take it to Reno. I'll bet the sound alone would wow the crowds. Already been done. http://www.bigbikeriders.com/48cyl.htm I bet that is great at straight lines, but how big is the turn radius? Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17 Jan, 16:14, bildan wrote:
I've been kicking this idea around with some mechanical engineers for a couple of years. Motorcycle in-line fours are state of the art high performance engines unencumbered by smog controls. *They get more than 100HP per liter with some at 140 HP/liter. *Of course, they rev like a dentist's drill. More importantly, the cylinder/head assembly just bolts to the crankcase. *Now, think of 7 or 9 of these in-line water cooled 4-cyl blocks arranged radially around a common crankcase. To make it work, you have to make the case, crank and new master/ articulating connecting rods. *You'd also need a gear case to drive the cam chains. *Finally, you'd need some serious gear reduction (~7:1) *planetary gear set in the nose case. *I'd also use an aircraft- type fuel injection system instead of carbs. If it worked, in the case of 9 cylinder blocks, you'd have a 36 cylinder, 500 pound, 30" diameter, 1000HP+ liquid cooled radial reminiscent of a half scale Lycoming XR7755. Now build a slick little carbon composite airplane around the monster and take it to Reno. *I'll bet the sound alone would wow the crowds. Here is a proper V8 made using 2 x suzuki hyabusa engine blocks and heads. It is properly engineered and gives twice the power of the original - say 350hp. If memory serves me correctly the power is taken off of a gear at the centre of the crank on the original and the V8 is likely the same. http://flickr.com/photos/10983301@N06/3068124763/ If you want more maybe a turbine should be considered ![]() http://www.pistonheads.com/roadtests/RadicalSR8.htm some description here with weight and power. Says £20,000 ready to run. Was built for car racing. There have been a number of similar projects I understand. google [radical v8] |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17 Jan, 21:22, bod43 wrote:
On 17 Jan, 16:14, bildan wrote: I've been kicking this idea around with some mechanical engineers for a couple of years. Motorcycle in-line fours are state of the art high performance engines unencumbered by smog controls. *They get more than 100HP per liter with some at 140 HP/liter. *Of course, they rev like a dentist's drill. More importantly, the cylinder/head assembly just bolts to the crankcase. *Now, think of 7 or 9 of these in-line water cooled 4-cyl blocks arranged radially around a common crankcase. To make it work, you have to make the case, crank and new master/ articulating connecting rods. *You'd also need a gear case to drive the cam chains. *Finally, you'd need some serious gear reduction (~7:1) *planetary gear set in the nose case. *I'd also use an aircraft- type fuel injection system instead of carbs. If it worked, in the case of 9 cylinder blocks, you'd have a 36 cylinder, 500 pound, 30" diameter, 1000HP+ liquid cooled radial reminiscent of a half scale Lycoming XR7755. Now build a slick little carbon composite airplane around the monster and take it to Reno. *I'll bet the sound alone would wow the crowds. Here is a proper V8 made using 2 x suzuki hyabusa engine blocks and heads. It is properly engineered and gives twice the power of the original - say 350hp. If memory serves me correctly the power is taken off of a gear at the centre of the crank on the original and the V8 is likely the same. Looks like the centre drive take off comment was rubbish - probably ![]() Here is another one. http://www.h1v8.com/albums/album_ima...06/1363744.htm The web site is quite informative. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Kimmel" wrote in message ... bildan wrote: I've been kicking this idea around with some mechanical engineers for a couple of years. Motorcycle in-line fours are state of the art high performance engines unencumbered by smog controls. They get more than 100HP per liter with some at 140 HP/liter. Of course, they rev like a dentist's drill. More importantly, the cylinder/head assembly just bolts to the crankcase. Now, think of 7 or 9 of these in-line water cooled 4-cyl blocks arranged radially around a common crankcase. To make it work, you have to make the case, crank and new master/ articulating connecting rods. You'd also need a gear case to drive the cam chains. Finally, you'd need some serious gear reduction (~7:1) planetary gear set in the nose case. I'd also use an aircraft- type fuel injection system instead of carbs. If it worked, in the case of 9 cylinder blocks, you'd have a 36 cylinder, 500 pound, 30" diameter, 1000HP+ liquid cooled radial reminiscent of a half scale Lycoming XR7755. Now build a slick little carbon composite airplane around the monster and take it to Reno. I'll bet the sound alone would wow the crowds. Already been done. http://www.bigbikeriders.com/48cyl.htm -- John Kimmel I think it will be quiet around here now. So long. The big bike reminds me of the task of putting windshield wipers on a duck's ass. It represents a technical challenge, but the outcome is of questionable value. Too much spare time? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 17, 5:30*pm, "Stuart Fields" wrote:
"John Kimmel" wrote in message ... bildan wrote: I've been kicking this idea around with some mechanical engineers for a couple of years. Motorcycle in-line fours are state of the art high performance engines unencumbered by smog controls. *They get more than 100HP per liter with some at 140 HP/liter. *Of course, they rev like a dentist's drill. More importantly, the cylinder/head assembly just bolts to the crankcase. *Now, think of 7 or 9 of these in-line water cooled 4-cyl blocks arranged radially around a common crankcase. To make it work, you have to make the case, crank and new master/ articulating connecting rods. *You'd also need a gear case to drive the cam chains. *Finally, you'd need some serious gear reduction (~7:1) *planetary gear set in the nose case. *I'd also use an aircraft- type fuel injection system instead of carbs. If it worked, in the case of 9 cylinder blocks, you'd have a 36 cylinder, 500 pound, 30" diameter, 1000HP+ liquid cooled radial reminiscent of a half scale Lycoming XR7755. Now build a slick little carbon composite airplane around the monster and take it to Reno. *I'll bet the sound alone would wow the crowds. Already been done. http://www.bigbikeriders.com/48cyl.htm -- John Kimmel I think it will be quiet around here now. *So long. * * The big bike reminds me of the task of putting windshield wipers on a duck's ass. *It represents a technical challenge, but the outcome is of questionable value. *Too much spare time? OK, the bike's prove you can take motorcycle 4 cyl blocks and create a monsterously powerful multi-bank engine with them. The Hyabusa V8 is particularly neat. The 48 clinder seems to be 2- stroke cylinders which is weird. For aviation, a big, round, mean, screaming, 1000HP radial would take the show. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
, bildan wrote: I've been kicking this idea around with some mechanical engineers for a couple of years. Motorcycle in-line fours are state of the art high performance engines unencumbered by smog controls. They get more than 100HP per liter with some at 140 HP/liter. Of course, they rev like a dentist's drill. More importantly, the cylinder/head assembly just bolts to the crankcase. Now, think of 7 or 9 of these in-line water cooled 4-cyl blocks arranged radially around a common crankcase. To make it work, you have to make the case, crank and new master/ articulating connecting rods. You'd also need a gear case to drive the cam chains. Finally, you'd need some serious gear reduction (~7:1) planetary gear set in the nose case. I'd also use an aircraft- type fuel injection system instead of carbs. If it worked, in the case of 9 cylinder blocks, you'd have a 36 cylinder, 500 pound, 30" diameter, 1000HP+ liquid cooled radial reminiscent of a half scale Lycoming XR7755. Now build a slick little carbon composite airplane around the monster and take it to Reno. I'll bet the sound alone would wow the crowds. Take a look at this: http://www.hartleyenterprises.citymax.com/page/page/1562069.htm 400hp from an engine weighing just 200lb. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 10:06:29 -0800 (PST), bildan
wrote: On Jan 17, 10:05*am, John Kimmel wrote: bildan wrote: I've been kicking this idea around with some mechanical engineers for a couple of years. Motorcycle in-line fours are state of the art high performance engines unencumbered by smog controls. *They get more than 100HP per liter with some at 140 HP/liter. *Of course, they rev like a dentist's drill. More importantly, the cylinder/head assembly just bolts to the crankcase. *Now, think of 7 or 9 of these in-line water cooled 4-cyl blocks arranged radially around a common crankcase. To make it work, you have to make the case, crank and new master/ articulating connecting rods. *You'd also need a gear case to drive the cam chains. *Finally, you'd need some serious gear reduction (~7:1) *planetary gear set in the nose case. *I'd also use an aircraft- type fuel injection system instead of carbs. If it worked, in the case of 9 cylinder blocks, you'd have a 36 cylinder, 500 pound, 30" diameter, 1000HP+ liquid cooled radial reminiscent of a half scale Lycoming XR7755. Now build a slick little carbon composite airplane around the monster and take it to Reno. *I'll bet the sound alone would wow the crowds. Already been done.http://www.bigbikeriders.com/48cyl.htm -- John Kimmel I think it will be quiet around here now. *So long. Actually, I think I made a mistake on the 30" diameter. I got that by measuring the distance from the crank center to the top of the valve covers of a Kawasaki. That's fine for a 4-cylinder but a radial is a different matter. To make room for 9 blocks and the intake/exhaust manifolds that go between them, the engine diameter would have to be larger. Maybe 42" - 48" diameter would work. try these.... http://www.mile16.com/Radial.html |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Soooo, what is the best plane to build around a corvair engine? | Lou | Home Built | 21 | November 11th 06 12:56 AM |
Real Time to build an RV10 | [email protected] | Home Built | 13 | October 31st 05 02:20 AM |
My 9th Wedding Anniversary Trip, To Newport, OR Carb Ice & Real Engine Out "Long" | NW_PILOT | Piloting | 32 | June 28th 04 11:45 PM |
RV Quick Build build times... | [email protected] | Home Built | 2 | December 17th 03 03:29 AM |
Real stats on engine failures? | Captain Wubba | Piloting | 127 | December 8th 03 04:09 PM |