![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Last year, during the annual inspection, we found some cracks as
described in the L105 Technical Note. The cracks were located in the solder joint. We did perform a repair within an appoved Air Workshop. We even receivd a Quality Certificate for this repair. Unofrtunately, now our "beloved" Administration refused to provide us the renewal of our Airworthiness Certifricate because in the Technical Note, it is said that if cracks are found, the control bridge has to be replaced. No mention about any kind of repair. Does someone have recommendation? A note from LET stating that a repair would be acceptable? Many thanks for any help. Bruno |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You do not state which country you are in.
I just re read the AD.. the US FAA used the "Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information (MCAI)" issued by another country to create Airworthiness Directive (AD) for US registered aircraft flying under a US issued airworthiness certificate. AD requires mandatory compliance. In the US, the AD also states that an "alternate means of compliance" (AMOC) may be applied for. This means you have to apply before the work is done on how you intend to conduct a "repair". The MCAI and the resulting AD did not specify a repair would meet the requirement.. only replacement of the offending part. The AMOC must be applied for and approved before the work is done, The factory that issued the MCAI normally has to agree with the AMOC, but not always. Having already completed the work, it would appear the only way to get your airworthiness certificate back is to remove the repaired part and replace it with one from the factory. BT "nimbus" wrote in message ... Last year, during the annual inspection, we found some cracks as described in the L105 Technical Note. The cracks were located in the solder joint. We did perform a repair within an appoved Air Workshop. We even receivd a Quality Certificate for this repair. Unofrtunately, now our "beloved" Administration refused to provide us the renewal of our Airworthiness Certifricate because in the Technical Note, it is said that if cracks are found, the control bridge has to be replaced. No mention about any kind of repair. Does someone have recommendation? A note from LET stating that a repair would be acceptable? Many thanks for any help. Bruno |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 31, 10:34*pm, "BT" wrote:
You do not state which country you are in. I just re read the AD.. the US FAA used the "Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information (MCAI)" issued by another country to create Airworthiness Directive (AD) for US registered aircraft flying under a US issued airworthiness certificate. AD requires mandatory compliance. In the US, the AD also states that an "alternate means of compliance" (AMOC) may be applied for. This means you have to apply before the work is done on how you intend to conduct a "repair". The MCAI and the resulting AD did not specify a repair would meet the requirement.. only replacement of the offending part. The AMOC must be applied for and approved before the work is done, The factory that issued the MCAI normally has to agree with the AMOC, but not always. Having already completed the work, it would appear the only way to get your airworthiness certificate back is to remove the repaired part and replace it with one from the factory. BT "nimbus" wrote in message ... Last year, during the annual inspection, we found some cracks as described in the L105 Technical Note. The cracks were located in the solder joint. We did perform a repair within an appoved Air Workshop. We even receivd a Quality Certificate for this repair. Unofrtunately, now our "beloved" Administration refused to provide us the renewal of our Airworthiness Certifricate because in the Technical Note, it is said that if cracks are found, the control bridge has to be replaced. No mention about any kind of repair. Does someone have recommendation? A note from LET stating that a repair would be acceptable? Many thanks for any help. Bruno http://www.brunomaes.com/ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am from Belgium (Europe).....
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Old pics - new scans 3 - Than Hoa bridge after LGB strike - note adjacent pontoon bridge | Dave Kearton | Aviation Photos | 0 | January 15th 08 09:47 PM |
Pre-buy Inspection | Jon Kraus | Owning | 49 | September 1st 04 12:42 PM |
100 Hr Inspection | Scott D. | General Aviation | 6 | August 15th 04 01:03 AM |
You Want Control? You Can't Handle Control! -- Was 140 dead | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 0 | March 2nd 04 08:48 PM |
FAA inspection | Paul Lee | Home Built | 6 | February 23rd 04 07:15 PM |