![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Red! Long time, eh? Right on again, I see.
John (NAVCAD class 32-57) "Red Rider" wrote in message . com... "Longtailedlizard" wrote in message ... There was a short-lived and little-known program in the early 80s whereby 35 enlisteds (E-5 thru E-7) went thru flight training and became LDOs, serving as instructors in primary flight training. It was touted to be a combination "career enhancer" for enlisteds and relief for fleet pilots who chafed at flight instructor status. They were designated Naval Aviators, however, not NAPs. I suppose it's not inconceivable that some might have reverted to enlisted status once the program was deemed to have flopped...and maybe one or two later became SEALs. That might account for the timeline. But I still have trouble swallowing qualified SEAL/designated Naval Aviator AND enlisted without having seen such unusualness promoed to the nth degree by the Navy PR mill, special ops or no. Ron, Having been stationed at NAS Pensacola, and NAS Meridian, from 83 to 89 are you referring to the NAVCAD program. I'm not to clear on the details, but isn't this where going through pilot training, they were cadets, if they graduated from training they were commissioned, and if they did'nt they went back home or to there former rank? J No that was the LDO aviation program. It wasn't ran like the NAVCAD/MARCAD program was. (I went through NAVCAD in 1960). The LDO aviation program offered a commission as a Jg (?????) Limited Duty Officer with a guarantee of 20 years service, and possibility of retiring as high as a Lt.Cmdr. I also think that they required the applicants to have a min of 6 years service (maybe it was be on 2d enlistment) and no more than 10 years service upon commissioning. This would allow them to retire at their rank upon completion of 20 years without having to revert or to exceed the 20 year limit. Unlike the NAVCAD program which would wash out the number needed to keep the size down to meet requirements, the LDO program had a fairly high completion rate. It was dropped and the NAVCAD program was brought back. It may be possible that a few of those selected for the LDO program were SEALS. And I guess that after completing 20 years service an LDO aviator it might have been possible to revert to his permanent enlisted rank, but he wouldn't have been continued as an aviator. The odds that this happened without a lot of PR Flak, is even more unlikely than believing that O.J. was innocent. I believe that this LDO program was similar to the Sub and Surface Warfare LDO programs of that time where it was part of the contract that you had to leave the Navy upon qualifying for retirement (transfer to the Fleet Reserve) and couldn't revert. But even if he was a SEAL, and former LDO Aviator who reverted there is no way in hell that the Air Force is going to let a lowly enlisted man fly one of their C-17's or a C-141's. Hell I did an exchange tour with the Air Force, and they didn't even like me being on their base, let alone flying their aircraft. They especially didn't like my landings. ROTFLMAO You know their aircraft really are delicate. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
DCPilots for Washington, DC area pilots | Bill | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | June 5th 04 12:32 AM |
Bush Pilots Fly-In. South Africa. | Bush Air | Home Built | 0 | May 25th 04 06:18 AM |
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? | No Spam! | Military Aviation | 120 | January 27th 04 10:19 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |