![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I spoke with the head of the FAA Small Aircraft Directorate for
gliders yesterday regarding Experimental Airworthiness Certificates for gliders. In at least several states and particularly Arizona all gliders are having their Experimental Airworthiness certificates reviewed. Due to an issue causing my DG505 to have its Standard Airworthiness certificate recently revoked, which I further lost on Federal appeal in front of the NTSB (see my posting June 8th 2010), due to bad paperwork supplied by AMS Flight, d.o.o., I was caused to engage the FAA in this dialogue. I was informed by the head of the FAA Small Aircraft Directorate for gliders that he recently had conversations with his supervisors in Washington, D.C. and that in order to obtain or retain an Experimental Airworthiness certificate the glider must be engaged in "racing" and "preparation for racing". He said an agenda of racing events must be supplied to the FAA at the local FSDO level at the time of issuance or revision of paperwork. I was told that the Experimental Airworthiness Certificate was NOT meant to be used for "fun flying". I asked if badge flying would be considered as a type of racing. He said that one could attempt to engage the local FSDO with this to see if in their judgement it would be valid, but he would not commit one way or the other. Having recently engaged the FAA in federal court I have found that they can be a bit of a sticky wicket. You may want to look at the code on the definition of Experimental Certification if you plan on obtaining or maintaining this type of certification. An electronic version of the code is easily reached online. Neil AZ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Worth noting that this applies to Experimental - Exhibition
certification, not Experimental - Amateur Built |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 15, 9:17*pm, NG wrote:
I spoke with the head of the FAA Small Aircraft Directorate for gliders yesterday regarding Experimental Airworthiness Certificates for gliders. *In at least several states and particularly Arizona all gliders are having their Experimental Airworthiness certificates reviewed. *Due to an issue causing my DG505 to have its Standard Airworthiness certificate recently revoked, which I further lost on Federal appeal in front of the NTSB (see my posting June 8th 2010), due to bad paperwork supplied by AMS Flight, d.o.o., I was caused to engage the FAA in this dialogue. I was informed by the head of the FAA Small Aircraft Directorate for gliders that he recently had conversations with his supervisors in Washington, D.C. and that in order to obtain or retain an Experimental Airworthiness certificate the glider must be engaged in "racing" and "preparation for racing". *He said an agenda of racing events must be supplied to the FAA at the local FSDO level at the time of issuance or revision of paperwork. *I was told that the Experimental Airworthiness Certificate was NOT meant to be used for "fun flying". I asked if badge flying would be considered as a type of racing. *He said that one could attempt to engage the local FSDO with this to see if in their judgement it would be valid, but he would not commit one way or the other. *Having recently engaged the FAA in federal court I have found that they can be a bit of a sticky wicket. *You may want to look at the code on the definition of Experimental Certification if you plan on obtaining or maintaining this type of certification. *An electronic version of the code is easily reached online. Neil AZ This sounds scary for us that have not flown in a contest for 15 years. Fred TX |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Fred" wrote This sounds scary for us that have not flown in a contest for 15 years. How about Experimental Developmental, or whatever that is for when you invent a dodad for the glider, and are testing and refining the dodad? Could that be made to fly, so to speak? -- Jim in NC |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 15, 8:17*pm, NG wrote:
I spoke with the head of the FAA Small Aircraft Directorate for gliders yesterday regarding Experimental Airworthiness Certificates for gliders. *In at least several states and particularly Arizona all gliders are having their Experimental Airworthiness certificates reviewed. *Due to an issue causing my DG505 to have its Standard Airworthiness certificate recently revoked, which I further lost on Federal appeal in front of the NTSB (see my posting June 8th 2010), due to bad paperwork supplied by AMS Flight, d.o.o., I was caused to engage the FAA in this dialogue. I was informed by the head of the FAA Small Aircraft Directorate for gliders that he recently had conversations with his supervisors in Washington, D.C. and that in order to obtain or retain an Experimental Airworthiness certificate the glider must be engaged in "racing" and "preparation for racing". *He said an agenda of racing events must be supplied to the FAA at the local FSDO level at the time of issuance or revision of paperwork. *I was told that the Experimental Airworthiness Certificate was NOT meant to be used for "fun flying". I asked if badge flying would be considered as a type of racing. *He said that one could attempt to engage the local FSDO with this to see if in their judgement it would be valid, but he would not commit one way or the other. *Having recently engaged the FAA in federal court I have found that they can be a bit of a sticky wicket. *You may want to look at the code on the definition of Experimental Certification if you plan on obtaining or maintaining this type of certification. *An electronic version of the code is easily reached online. Neil AZ Download yourself a copy of FAA Order 8130.2 with Chg 5. Read Section 10 for comprehension. Everything that applies to ALL and Group I applies to you. See para 161b(35). (35) Proficiency flights are authorized without geographical restrictions when conducted in preparation for participation in sanctioned meets and pursuant to qualify for Federal Aeronautique International (FAI) or Soaring Society of America (SSA) awards. These flights may only take place as defined in the applicant’s program letter, and prior to the specific FAI or SSA event. The pilot in command must submit a description of the intended route and/or geographical area intended to be flown to the local FSDO. (Applicability: Group I, gliders only) I could spend two life times becoming more proficient and chasing FAI and SSA Awards. Let's see, there's badges, records, diplomas, competition, and the OLC. Much too much to race for to only fly for fun. Soaring is a wonderful sport, isn't it? One real concern, check with your life insurance underwriter about flying gliders and experimental aircraft. We'll be looking for your flights on OLC. Happy racing, Frank Whiteley |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 15, 7:29*pm, Tony wrote:
Worth noting that this applies to Experimental - Exhibition certification, not Experimental - Amateur Built Thanks, you beat me to it. Bob K. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Frank and Bob:
The FAA small aircraft directorate did refer me to document 8130.2 F and 8100.8C regarding these same issues. I will study them as you have also suggested. Thanks! Neil |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 15, 11:05*pm, Frank Whiteley wrote:
On Jun 15, 8:17*pm, NG wrote: I spoke with the head of the FAA Small Aircraft Directorate for gliders yesterday regarding Experimental Airworthiness Certificates for gliders. *In at least several states and particularly Arizona all gliders are having their Experimental Airworthiness certificates reviewed. *Due to an issue causing my DG505 to have its Standard Airworthiness certificate recently revoked, which I further lost on Federal appeal in front of the NTSB (see my posting June 8th 2010), due to bad paperwork supplied by AMS Flight, d.o.o., I was caused to engage the FAA in this dialogue. I was informed by the head of the FAA Small Aircraft Directorate for gliders that he recently had conversations with his supervisors in Washington, D.C. and that in order to obtain or retain an Experimental Airworthiness certificate the glider must be engaged in "racing" and "preparation for racing". *He said an agenda of racing events must be supplied to the FAA at the local FSDO level at the time of issuance or revision of paperwork. *I was told that the Experimental Airworthiness Certificate was NOT meant to be used for "fun flying". I asked if badge flying would be considered as a type of racing. *He said that one could attempt to engage the local FSDO with this to see if in their judgement it would be valid, but he would not commit one way or the other. *Having recently engaged the FAA in federal court I have found that they can be a bit of a sticky wicket. *You may want to look at the code on the definition of Experimental Certification if you plan on obtaining or maintaining this type of certification. *An electronic version of the code is easily reached online. Neil AZ Download yourself a copy of FAA Order 8130.2 with Chg 5. Read Section 10 for comprehension. *Everything that applies to ALL and Group I applies to you. See para 161b(35). (35) Proficiency flights are authorized without geographical restrictions when conducted in preparation for participation in sanctioned meets and pursuant to qualify for Federal Aeronautique International (FAI) or Soaring Society of America (SSA) awards. These flights may only take place as defined in the applicant’s program letter, and prior to the specific FAI or SSA event. The pilot in command must submit a description of the intended route and/or geographical area intended to be flown to the local FSDO. (Applicability: Group I, gliders only) I could spend two life times becoming more proficient and chasing FAI and SSA Awards. *Let's see, there's badges, records, diplomas, competition, and the OLC. *Much too much to race for to only fly for fun. *Soaring is a wonderful sport, isn't it? *One real concern, check with your life insurance underwriter about flying gliders and experimental aircraft. We'll be looking for your flights on OLC. Happy racing, Frank Whiteley One wonders what this is really all about. So far, it appears easily dealt with. But restive bureaucracies are always a concern. Am I correct in my understanding that none of this applies to exp - air racing certificated aircraft licensed before 1992 -- that is, those of us without annual program letter requirements? -T8 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 16, 8:00*am, T8 wrote:
On Jun 15, 11:05*pm, Frank Whiteley wrote: On Jun 15, 8:17*pm, NG wrote: I spoke with the head of the FAA Small Aircraft Directorate for gliders yesterday regarding Experimental Airworthiness Certificates for gliders. *In at least several states and particularly Arizona all gliders are having their Experimental Airworthiness certificates reviewed. *Due to an issue causing my DG505 to have its Standard Airworthiness certificate recently revoked, which I further lost on Federal appeal in front of the NTSB (see my posting June 8th 2010), due to bad paperwork supplied by AMS Flight, d.o.o., I was caused to engage the FAA in this dialogue. I was informed by the head of the FAA Small Aircraft Directorate for gliders that he recently had conversations with his supervisors in Washington, D.C. and that in order to obtain or retain an Experimental Airworthiness certificate the glider must be engaged in "racing" and "preparation for racing". *He said an agenda of racing events must be supplied to the FAA at the local FSDO level at the time of issuance or revision of paperwork. *I was told that the Experimental Airworthiness Certificate was NOT meant to be used for "fun flying". I asked if badge flying would be considered as a type of racing. *He said that one could attempt to engage the local FSDO with this to see if in their judgement it would be valid, but he would not commit one way or the other. *Having recently engaged the FAA in federal court I have found that they can be a bit of a sticky wicket. *You may want to look at the code on the definition of Experimental Certification if you plan on obtaining or maintaining this type of certification. *An electronic version of the code is easily reached online. Neil AZ Download yourself a copy of FAA Order 8130.2 with Chg 5. Read Section 10 for comprehension. *Everything that applies to ALL and Group I applies to you. See para 161b(35). (35) Proficiency flights are authorized without geographical restrictions when conducted in preparation for participation in sanctioned meets and pursuant to qualify for Federal Aeronautique International (FAI) or Soaring Society of America (SSA) awards. These flights may only take place as defined in the applicant’s program letter, and prior to the specific FAI or SSA event. The pilot in command must submit a description of the intended route and/or geographical area intended to be flown to the local FSDO. (Applicability: Group I, gliders only) I could spend two life times becoming more proficient and chasing FAI and SSA Awards. *Let's see, there's badges, records, diplomas, competition, and the OLC. *Much too much to race for to only fly for fun. *Soaring is a wonderful sport, isn't it? *One real concern, check with your life insurance underwriter about flying gliders and experimental aircraft. We'll be looking for your flights on OLC. Happy racing, Frank Whiteley One wonders what this is really all about. *So far, it appears easily dealt with. *But restive bureaucracies are always a concern. Am I correct in my understanding that none of this applies to exp - air racing certificated aircraft licensed before 1992 -- that is, those of us without annual program letter requirements? -T8 The precise pre-/post-moratorium dates are in the order. Section 10, para 155d. d. Experimental Airworthiness Certification Moratorium. On July 9, 1993, a moratorium was established because of a dramatic increase in applications for special airworthiness certificates and SFAs for non-U.S.-manufactured aircraft that did not hold TCs issued under § 21.29. The moratorium was lifted on August 18, 1993, with interim guidance provided to certificate these aircraft. Although the moratorium was established for non-U.S.-manufactured aircraft, this policy will be used when issuing a special airworthiness certificate for the experimental purpose(s) of exhibition or air racing, regardless of the country of manufacture. Para 155e gives the pre-moratorium exemption e. Effectivity. Aircraft that received original airworthiness certification before July 9, 1993, are NOT affected by this order unless the original airworthiness certification purpose changes, for example, from R&D to exhibition. Those aircraft, except for purpose changes, will not be affected until the FAA works with the public to determine the best strategy to certificate all experimental exhibition and/or air racing aircraft in accordance with the new policy. The policy established in this order will not be used in these cases unless specifically requested by the applicant. Frank Whiteley |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This sounds scary for us that have not flown in a contest for 15
years. Fred TX- This is obviously a dastardly plot by the SRA to force all the owners of nice, new, shiny racing gliders to show up at races and compete, thereby injecting new life in the (soon to be) growing sport of glider racing! A Red Bull sponsorship, along with a TV show on ESPN (and hot chicks in bikinis) is sure to follow.... For those who still insist on not showing up at contests, just list all the SSA and local contest dates on your program letter, filling in any blank dates with whatever badge legs you still need, and finally declaring a random OLC task as a backup on any remaining free days. Remember to keep a day free every other year for your flight review, then update the list daily (based on the latest wx forecast and size of the Gulf Oil Spill) to your friendly neighborhood FSDO, who will be ecstatic at your level of compliance - promotion for sure! Or, if any of you proud owners of a nice new ASG-29 or LS-10 don't feel up to keeping your paperwork straight with the Feds, I'll be happy to trade you my nice pre-moratorium 3-diamond LS6, which still does not need a full time secretary to stay legal and in which you can still fly for fun... This sure makes me proud to be an American - home of the best bureaucracy money can buy! Kirk 66 "Racing to Fly, Flying to Race" |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Experimental aircraft and towing | Marc Ramsey | Soaring | 8 | January 28th 17 08:23 AM |
Pentagon confirms Iranian directorate as officials raise new concerns about war: | dontcowerfromthetruth | Naval Aviation | 2 | June 16th 06 09:04 PM |
Flying Club with Experimental Aircraft | Jeff | Home Built | 6 | October 5th 05 09:16 PM |
Financing for Experimental Aircraft | James Keane | Owning | 2 | September 1st 04 02:18 AM |
Experimental Aircraft Pictures | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 0 | December 5th 03 10:12 PM |