![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is a poster here called Jim Pennino, but in
actuality he's Jim Pinheado. His tiny little level of character development leads him to follow new posters around and make obnoxious incorrect statements. He will take everything you say and dispute it. EVERYTHING. When you prove him wrong, he will do his pinhead dance. He will misquote himself to try and wiggle out of previous positions. Or he will try and redefine what he previously said. Upon losing, he will then SEPERATE OUT a single sentence which wasn't the original topic, and then try and make this the new top in order to change the subject. 1) I've made the assertion that airplanes are today unavailable to the numbers of people interested in flying as compared to the same in 1970. Not only have people come forth to share their stories of confirmation on this, I've even provided income data and price comparison to prove this. But Pinhead Pennino argued the ratio hasn't changed. Then he claimed he didn't say it, and...you guessed it, changed the arguement to what the definition of buying power is. Arguement for the sake of arguement. 2) I said that used Piper Sport Airplanes are on the market. By this...I meant that the Czech sportcruiser which we are all familiar with ( except pinhead ) are available. You see, often these planes get new names, and for a time we call them by their old names, or we use the new name, but everyone knows them as the same plane under their old name. Example: For a couple of years anytime I mentioned the Cessna 350 or Cessna 400, no old timers knew what I was talking about. This is because they were previously, and still commonly thought of as the Columbia 350 or Columbia 400. For all intents and purposes it was the same plane with a new name. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columbia_Aircraft. In the case of my arguement with Pinheado, it's amply clear that he didn't even know where the hell the Piper Sport came from. After I corrected him, he googled the info and tried to build a dishonest defense to his mistake. Even today he won't take the word of the President of Piper!! He argues for the sake of arguement, oh...and insults you every step of the way, and tells folks that the person disagreeing with him must be a "troll", or a "retard". 3) Pinheado made the claim that pretty much ALL LSA's go 138mph. (then he lied and changed his "fact" to a range of 130mph - 138mph) Still wrong. You see, he didn't have a clue as to which planes were in this category. So, he googled...and saw the thousands of ultralights are also LSA's which couldn't possibly even go 90mph. How did Pinheado react to yet another one of his wrong statements? You guessed it. He changed the subject to his new argument for the sake of arguement, which was..."Which website advertises more planes?" Then he singled out one model of plane for comparison to try and prove his point. How anal. Really, who knows or gives a flying **** which website is the winner? The fact is, we're talking thousands and thousands by barnstormers, and that isn't the original debate anyway. My original point is that all LSA's don't go 138mph. This is just a sampling of the behaviour you may expect from Pinheado. Is this an attempt at cyberbullying? Of course it is. Why would he do this? Answer: Because he's... Jim Pinheado, the anal pinhead who argues for the sake of arguement, so he won't let anyone take his little corner away from him. --- Reporting from the front: Mark |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 04:38:20 -0700 (PDT), Mark wrote:
There is a poster here called Jim Pennino, but in actuality he's Jim Pinheado. Attaboi, Mark(ie) show 'em for the real trolling piece of garbage you are. -- A fireside chat not with Ari! http://tr.im/holj Motto: Live To Spooge It! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 15, 10:47*am, Ari Silverstein wrote:
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 04:38:20 -0700 (PDT), Mark wrote: There is a poster here called Jim Pennino, but in actuality he's Jim Pinheado. Attaboi, Mark(ie) show 'em for the real trolling piece of garbage you are. -- Facts are facts. Such as the fact that you cross-post lies and assume other peoples identites because you're too big of a nit-wit to put an intelligent thought together, and you're such a narcissistic sociopath that you can easily be manipulated into spending 8 months of your useless life into obsessing over anyone who wants you to. Basically the name Ari Silverstein is synonymous with troll. Just an underachieving liar trying to capture self esteem on usenet. So where is that Piper Seneca you claimed to have? So where is that Velocity RG you claimed to have? Fool. --- Mark |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark wrote:
There is a poster here called Jim Pennino, Only thing you've got totally correct so far. So, are you still planning to modify a LSA to increase the cruise speed, which will invalidate the airworthiness certificate as well as violate the rules on who can perform maintenance on a manufactured aircraft? -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 15, 12:21*pm, wrote:
Mark wrote: There is a poster here called Jim Pennino, Only thing you've got totally correct so far. So, are you still planning to modify a LSA to increase the cruise speed, which will invalidate the airworthiness certificate as well as violate the rules on who can perform maintenance on a manufactured aircraft? -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. It depends on what country I'm living in. --- Mark |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 09:45:57 -0700 (PDT), Mark wrote:
On Sep 15, 12:21*pm, wrote: Mark wrote: There is a poster here called Jim Pennino, Only thing you've got totally correct so far. So, are you still planning to modify a LSA to increase the cruise speed, which will invalidate the airworthiness certificate as well as violate the rules on who can perform maintenance on a manufactured aircraft? -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. It depends on what country I'm living in. --- Mark Translation: It depends on what dementia you are experiencing. lol -- A fireside chat not with Ari! http://tr.im/holj Motto: Live To Spooge It! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 08:33:37 -0700 (PDT), Mark wrote:
On Sep 15, 10:47*am, Ari Silverstein wrote: On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 04:38:20 -0700 (PDT), Mark wrote: There is a poster here called Jim Pennino, but in actuality he's Jim Pinheado. Attaboi, Mark(ie) show 'em for the real trolling piece of garbage you are. -- Facts are facts. Agreed. Garbage in, garbage out. Mark(ie) The Bipolar GIGO. -- A fireside chat not with Ari! http://tr.im/holj Motto: Live To Spooge It! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark wrote:
On Sep 15, 12:21Â*pm, wrote: Mark wrote: There is a poster here called Jim Pennino, Only thing you've got totally correct so far. So, are you still planning to modify a LSA to increase the cruise speed, which will invalidate the airworthiness certificate as well as violate the rules on who can perform maintenance on a manufactured aircraft? -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. It depends on what country I'm living in. LSA is a FAA definition ergo they only exist in the US. The airplanes may exist outside of the US, but they aren't LSA. So, are you still planning to modify a LSA to increase the cruise speed, which will invalidate the airworthiness certificate as well as violate the rules on who can perform maintenance on a manufactured aircraft? -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 15, 1:13*pm, wrote:
Mark wrote: On Sep 15, 12:21*pm, wrote: Mark wrote: There is a poster here called Jim Pennino, Only thing you've got totally correct so far. So, are you still planning to modify a LSA to increase the cruise speed, which will invalidate the airworthiness certificate as well as violate the rules on who can perform maintenance on a manufactured aircraft? -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. It depends on what country I'm living in. LSA is a FAA definition ergo they only exist in the US. The airplanes may exist outside of the US, but they aren't LSA. So, are you still planning to modify a LSA to increase the cruise speed, which will invalidate the airworthiness certificate as well as violate the rules on who can perform maintenance on a manufactured aircraft? -- Jim Pennino There is a poster here called Jim Pennino, but in actuality he's Jim Pinheado. His tiny little level of character development leads him to follow new posters around and make obnoxious incorrect statements. He will take everything you say and dispute it. EVERYTHING. When you prove him wrong, he will do his pinhead dance. He will misquote himself to try and wiggle out of previous positions. Or he will try and redefine what he previously said. Upon losing, he will then SEPERATE OUT a single sentence which wasn't the original topic, and then try and make this the new top in order to change the subject. 1) I've made the assertion that airplanes are today unavailable to the numbers of people interested in flying as compared to the same in 1970. Not only have people come forth to share their stories of confirmation on this, I've even provided income data and price comparison to prove this. But Pinhead Pennino argued the ratio hasn't changed. Then he claimed he didn't say it, and...you guessed it, changed the arguement to what the definition of buying power is. Arguement for the sake of arguement. 2) I said that used Piper Sport Airplanes are on the market. By this...I meant that the Czech sportcruiser which we are all familiar with ( except pinhead ) are available. You see, often these planes get new names, and for a time we call them by their old names, or we use the new name, but everyone knows them as the same plane under their old name. Example: For a couple of years anytime I mentioned the Cessna 350 or Cessna 400, no old timers knew what I was talking about. This is because they were previously, and still commonly thought of as the Columbia 350 or Columbia 400. For all intents and purposes it was the same plane with a new name. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columbia_Aircraft. In the case of my arguement with Pinheado, it's amply clear that he didn't even know where the hell the Piper Sport came from. After I corrected him, he googled the info and tried to build a dishonest defense to his mistake. Even today he won't take the word of the President of Piper!! He argues for the sake of arguement, oh...and insults you every step of the way, and tells folks that the person disagreeing with him must be a "troll", or a "retard". 3) Pinheado made the claim that pretty much ALL LSA's go 138mph. (then he lied and changed his "fact" to a range of 130mph - 138mph) Still wrong. You see, he didn't have a clue as to which planes were in this category. So, he googled...and saw the thousands of ultralights are also LSA's which couldn't possibly even go 90mph. How did Pinheado react to yet another one of his wrong statements? You guessed it. He changed the subject to his new argument for the sake of arguement, which was..."Which website advertises more planes?" Then he singled out one model of plane for comparison to try and prove his point. How anal. Really, who knows or gives a flying **** which website is the winner? The fact is, we're talking thousands and thousands by barnstormers, and that isn't the original debate anyway. My original point is that all LSA's don't go 138mph. This is just a sampling of the behaviour you may expect from Pinheado. Is this an attempt at cyberbullying? Of course it is. Why would he do this? Answer: Because he's... Jim Pinheado, the anal pinhead who argues for the sake of arguement, so he won't let anyone take his little corner away from him. --- Reporting from the front: Mark |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|