![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"The US Marine Corps has finally cleared
the Bell Helicopter AH-1Z Viper for operations, only a few weeks ahead of a decision to launch full-rate production. Declared "operationally effective and suitable" on 29 September, the AH-1Z programme can close the book on a protracted, four-year operational evaluation (OPEVAL) process delayed by reliability and technical glitches." See: http://www.flightglobal.com/articles...bat-ready.html It's finally here! Will this be the last of the Cobra line? Or will they start over again at AH-1AA, AH-1BB........etc.? ![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 1, 2:46*pm, Daryl Hunt wrote:
On 10/1/2010 3:05 PM, wrote: "The US Marine Corps has finally cleared the Bell Helicopter AH-1Z Viper for operations, only a few weeks ahead of a decision to launch full-rate production. Declared "operationally effective and suitable" on 29 September, the AH-1Z programme can close the book on a protracted, four-year operational evaluation (OPEVAL) process delayed by reliability and technical glitches." See: http://www.flightglobal.com/articles...usmc-declares-... It's finally here! *Will this be the last of the Cobra line? *Or will they start over again at AH-1AA, AH-1BB........etc.? * * ![]() A few years ago, I witnessed a mock fight between the New Apache and the old AH-1U. *Short fight. *The Cobra ran rampant over the Apache. *It's quicker, nimbler, smaller, etc.. and still packs quite a whollop. *I think it was a mistake for the Army to rely almost soley on the Apaches when a cheaper AH-1 can do pretty much the same job. *Of course, they've asked the Apache to do much more than it really should and have gotten off pretty lucky a couple of times but it's going to bite them again. Didn't the Army prefer the Apache because it's mast-mounted radar allowed it to fire at tanks from behind hills and such? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/2/2010 12:55 AM, wrote:
On Oct 1, 2:46 pm, Daryl wrote: On 10/1/2010 3:05 PM, wrote: "The US Marine Corps has finally cleared the Bell Helicopter AH-1Z Viper for operations, only a few weeks ahead of a decision to launch full-rate production. Declared "operationally effective and suitable" on 29 September, the AH-1Z programme can close the book on a protracted, four-year operational evaluation (OPEVAL) process delayed by reliability and technical glitches." See: http://www.flightglobal.com/articles...usmc-declares-... It's finally here! Will this be the last of the Cobra line? Or will they start over again at AH-1AA, AH-1BB........etc.? ![]() A few years ago, I witnessed a mock fight between the New Apache and the old AH-1U. Short fight. The Cobra ran rampant over the Apache. It's quicker, nimbler, smaller, etc.. and still packs quite a whollop. I think it was a mistake for the Army to rely almost soley on the Apaches when a cheaper AH-1 can do pretty much the same job. Of course, they've asked the Apache to do much more than it really should and have gotten off pretty lucky a couple of times but it's going to bite them again. Didn't the Army prefer the Apache because it's mast-mounted radar allowed it to fire at tanks from behind hills and such? Actually the Longbow masthead contains a radar that is used to hand off to Hellfire that can fly over the hill behind which the Apache is lurking. It can also be used to recce before the Apache pops up and uses other weapons. http://www.jolly-rogers.com/airpower/ah-64d/64d-av.htm Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/1/2010 11:55 PM, wrote:
On Oct 1, 2:46 pm, Daryl wrote: On 10/1/2010 3:05 PM, wrote: "The US Marine Corps has finally cleared the Bell Helicopter AH-1Z Viper for operations, only a few weeks ahead of a decision to launch full-rate production. Declared "operationally effective and suitable" on 29 September, the AH-1Z programme can close the book on a protracted, four-year operational evaluation (OPEVAL) process delayed by reliability and technical glitches." See: http://www.flightglobal.com/articles...usmc-declares-... It's finally here! Will this be the last of the Cobra line? Or will they start over again at AH-1AA, AH-1BB........etc.? ![]() A few years ago, I witnessed a mock fight between the New Apache and the old AH-1U. Short fight. The Cobra ran rampant over the Apache. It's quicker, nimbler, smaller, etc.. and still packs quite a whollop. I think it was a mistake for the Army to rely almost soley on the Apaches when a cheaper AH-1 can do pretty much the same job. Of course, they've asked the Apache to do much more than it really should and have gotten off pretty lucky a couple of times but it's going to bite them again. Didn't the Army prefer the Apache because it's mast-mounted radar allowed it to fire at tanks from behind hills and such? You are thinking of the Long Bow. That came after the Apache was well into the Army inventory. The Long Bow finally lived up to the Apaches hopes. The AH-64D was introduced in 1992. The Long Bow was introduced in 1997. 232 A and D models were converted to Long Bow specs. You would think that the Apache Long Bow could take on a Cobra heads up. While the Apache was progressing so was the Cobra. And the Cobra is still more agile and nimble being much lighter. The Apache was sought after by the ARmy for it's superior firepower. It also was supposed to be better in flight. It isn't. It's too heavy for a dog on dog fight in a Helo war. While the Apache is heavily armored, it is still suseptable to the weapons carried on the more nimble Cobra. If you loaded out an Apache with the armor to take hits from the Cobras 20mm M61 Vulcan Cannon the Apache would have trouble flying being so laid down with armor. The same goes for the Cobra against the 30mm chain gun of the Apache. Each one has a different mission that it does better than the other. The Marines like to get down and dirty and their Ground troops and air assets are all under one commander. AFter hearing many of the ARmy types speak out, this is what they want as well but don't have. They may have command over the Apaches but the fast movers are all Marine, Navy or AF. I think if the Air Assets were commanded by the ground commanders we would have the same things happen that broke the AF away from the ARmy in the first place. The Army is very, very large and the Ground CO isn't expected to understand or consider all things in the Air Assets. The Marines are smaller and they can do this. Give the CO a break. He has enough going on already. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "dott.Piergiorgio" wrote in message ... Il 01/10/2010 23:05, ha scritto: It's finally here! Will this be the last of the Cobra line? Or will they start over again at AH-1AA, AH-1BB........etc.? ![]() the latter, out of question, AA, AB, AC and so on... It's a design on par with the .50 M2 Best regards from Italy, dott. Piergiorgio. AH-A1M1 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 2, 2:21*am, Daryl Hunt wrote:
Each one has a different mission that it does better than the other. Also, the Cobra's base is a ship. You can get more AH1s in the hangar of a LHD than you can get AH64s. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/3/2010 2:25 PM, Alan Nordin wrote:
On Oct 2, 2:21 am, Daryl wrote: Each one has a different mission that it does better than the other. Also, the Cobra's base is a ship. You can get more AH1s in the hangar of a LHD than you can get AH64s. Sounds like you spent a day or two in one of those floating Chow Halls. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 2, 2:21*am, Daryl Hunt wrote:
You would think that the Apache Long Bow could take on a Cobra heads up. *While the Apache was progressing so was the Cobra. And the Cobra is still more agile and nimble being much lighter. I don't believe that chopper's air-to-air capability matters that much. Before they could get into a merge they would have to survive all of the fighters, air defense and golden BB's that are a much bigger concern than another chopper's dogfighting ability. And for that, the Cobra has a smaller profile so it should be less vulnerable to BB's, but they are both equally vulnerable to fighters, MANPADs, Shilkas, etc. Chris Manteuffel |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
To All USMC Reservists from HQ, USMC: | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | August 24th 06 07:21 AM |
Steve Fosset -- Breaks record, but loses generator &declares an Emergency | Jay Somerset | Piloting | 1 | February 11th 06 07:13 PM |
Combat Ready Bush? | WaltBJ | Military Aviation | 43 | September 14th 04 10:38 PM |
GW Bush - combat ready? | WaltBJ | Military Aviation | 2 | September 10th 04 10:32 AM |
German OMF Aircraft Declares Bankruptcy | Fitzair4 | Home Built | 3 | December 10th 03 11:13 PM |