![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Browsing controller.com I noticed that there is a category for
homebuilt/experimental aircraft. My limited understanding of homebuilt aircraft is that it is an experimental plane, built for the pleasure/education of the builder. The builder of said plane, being the mfr, may work on it or an A&P mechanic can. I didn't think the FAA would allow someone to legally fly an experimental they bought; however, the number of planes on controller indicate that this is allowed or at least not enforced. I am curious then about a few things: 1. Are there people who just build kit/plan planes to sell them? 2. Does the FAA simply choose to ignore them? 3. What responsibilities does the builder have with the plane? 4. As the owner of a homebuilt they didn't build, can the purchaser work on the plane or does it now become like a 172 that must be repaired by an A&P guy? 5. How much can you trust a purchased homebuilt? I know they have to get an airworthiness inspection to fly but that doesn't mean it was built well. Is there a certain minimum level of quality a plane must have to get the certificate? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
es330td wrote:
Browsing controller.com I noticed that there is a category for homebuilt/experimental aircraft. My limited understanding of homebuilt aircraft is that it is an experimental plane, built for the pleasure/education of the builder. The builder of said plane, being the mfr, may work on it or an A&P mechanic can. I didn't think the FAA would allow someone to legally fly an experimental they bought; however, the number of planes on controller indicate that this is allowed or at least not enforced. I am curious then about a few things: 1. Are there people who just build kit/plan planes to sell them? 2. Does the FAA simply choose to ignore them? 3. What responsibilities does the builder have with the plane? 4. As the owner of a homebuilt they didn't build, can the purchaser work on the plane or does it now become like a 172 that must be repaired by an A&P guy? 5. How much can you trust a purchased homebuilt? I know they have to get an airworthiness inspection to fly but that doesn't mean it was built well. Is there a certain minimum level of quality a plane must have to get the certificate? What you think that once you build a HB you are stuck with it for life. Of course you can sell it and the new owner can fly it. Now for your questions. 1. Yes there are people that build Exp-HBs JUST to sell them. And it is a violation. 2. The FAA is going to come down on these guys sooner or later. 3. That is a legal question that doesn't have a lot of case law on it. 4. The owner or anybody else can work on a Exp-HB. What he can't do is the annual inspection. Only an A&P or the original builder who got the Repairman's certificate can do that. 5. Like any aircraft you should get someone you trust to go over it. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 6, 5:47*pm, Gig 601XL Builder
wrote: Well...It didn't make sense to me that only the builder of a plane can fly it; what would happen when they eventually pass on? Are all builders supposed to be buried in their plane? Since I don't have a HB (though there are a couple I'd like) I really didn't know anything the actual rules. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
es330td wrote:
3. What responsibilities does the builder have with the plane? Here's one link that discusses this issue (note that it mentions the death of John Denver in a homebuilt and a lawsuit involving a death in a homebuilt gyroplane): http://www.aviationlawcorp.com/content/liabhomeblt.html 5. How much can you trust a purchased homebuilt? I know they have to get an airworthiness inspection to fly but that doesn't mean it was built well. Is there a certain minimum level of quality a plane must have to get the certificate? Here's one broad overview article of buying and selling homebuilt aircraft that briefly discusses those issues: http://www.kitplanes.com/magazine/pdfs/0200p22.pdf |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 6, 5:00*pm, es330td wrote:
On Feb 6, 5:47*pm, Gig 601XL Builder wrote: Well...It didn't make sense to me that only the builder of a plane can fly it; what would happen when they eventually pass on? Are all builders supposed to be buried in their plane? *Since I don't have a HB (though there are a couple I'd like) I really didn't know anything the actual rules. I know of a few builders who would probably love to be buried in their plane but NO, it is not necessary. On the issue of trusting a homebuilt aircraft, I would probably be more trusting of most of the homebuilt aircraft that I have seen than many production aircraft, especially some of the 20-30+ year old planes out there. While I have seen a few less than stellar homebuilts, most are built to what I would consider higher standards than any production aircraft. That said, you would be well advised to do a very complete inspection of any homebuilt you are considering buying. Having an inspection by an A&P would be adviseable rather you are buying a homebuilt or used production plane. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"es330td" wrote in message
... Browsing controller.com I noticed that there is a category for homebuilt/experimental aircraft. My limited understanding of homebuilt aircraft is that it is an experimental plane, built for the pleasure/education of the builder. The builder of said plane, being the mfr, may work on it or an A&P mechanic can. Or, if you buy it, you can work on it. The builder can do the annual "condition inspection" (assuming the get a repairmans's certificate). A second owner would have to get an A&P, an AI, or the original owner to do the inspections. I didn't think the FAA would allow someone to legally fly an experimental they bought; however, the number of planes on controller indicate that this is allowed or at least not enforced. I am curious then about a few things: It's legal to sell and buy a homebuilt. 1. Are there people who just build kit/plan planes to sell them? Yes. Though, that is not the intent of the regs. 2. Does the FAA simply choose to ignore them? Depends. 3. What responsibilities does the builder have with the plane? Pretty much the same as Cessna or Piper or... You wreck it, your heirs can attempt to sue the builder. 4. As the owner of a homebuilt they didn't build, can the purchaser work on the plane or does it now become like a 172 that must be repaired by an A&P guy? As above, you can do work, but the inspections must be done by an A&P (or AI) so it makes a lot of sense to not do the work without making sure the A&P will sign off on it when the time comes. One would also want to make sure that one's A&P of choice is willing to inspect and sign the work done by the original builder BEFORE putting a money down. Remember - it is likely that the aircraft has never been seen by an A&P... 5. How much can you trust a purchased homebuilt? I know they have to get an airworthiness inspection to fly but that doesn't mean it was built well. Is there a certain minimum level of quality a plane must have to get the certificate? Buyer Beware. The FAA makes sure you have done all the required paperwork. Most homebuilts are very well built. But there are those with flaws. Even if it looks well built, it's possible, for example, that the builder liked to "add stuff" and/or "beef it up a bit" and/or but a larger than original engine and... It wouldn't be the first time a very nice looking homebuilt with all the bells and whistles came out with an empty weight that exceeds the designers intended gross weight. Find someone who has built and flown the type you are looking at to inspect the aircraft with you (along with your choice of A&P). Most common designs have some kind of builders association who can help you out. There are a lot of really nice homebulit aircraft out there. But you (as a buyer) have to do some extra work to make sure you know what you are really getting. Remember - each individual homebuilt aircraft is unique. -- Geoff The Sea Hawk at Wow Way d0t Com remove spaces and make the obvious substitutions to reply by mail When immigration is outlawed, only outlaws will immigrate. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 14:05:19 -0800 (PST), es330td wrote:
Browsing controller.com I noticed that there is a category for homebuilt/experimental aircraft. My limited understanding of homebuilt aircraft is that it is an experimental plane, built for the pleasure/education of the builder. The builder of said plane, being the mfr, may work on it or an A&P mechanic can. I didn't think the FAA would allow someone to legally fly an experimental they bought; however, the number of planes on controller indicate that this is allowed or at least not enforced. I am curious then about a few things: 1. Are there people who just build kit/plan planes to sell them? 2. Does the FAA simply choose to ignore them? 3. What responsibilities does the builder have with the plane? 4. As the owner of a homebuilt they didn't build, can the purchaser work on the plane or does it now become like a 172 that must be repaired by an A&P guy? Anyone can *work* on a homebuilt, but it takes either the original builder or an A&P to do the yearly condition inspection (e.g., "annual," but not really). 5. How much can you trust a purchased homebuilt? I know they have to get an airworthiness inspection to fly but that doesn't mean it was built well. Is there a certain minimum level of quality a plane must have to get the certificate? Been flying a used homebuilt for ~12 years...in fact, I'm the fourth owner of it. Your posting reminded me that I forgot to post the FAQ this month. See the separate posting.... Ron Wanttaja |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As Capt Thorpe stated, after purchasing a homebuilt aircraft you can do
repairs and modifications. In my case, I purchased a HP-14 sailplane. This was my second Schreder design. An overview of the work performed prior to flying the bird is contained in the second paragraph of the following link. (http://www.soaridaho.com/Schreder/HP-14/N990/N990.html) The second paragraph is a summery of 26 log book entries. Once I thought my HP-14 was safe to fly I had an A&P perform a condition inspection. (In my case my inspector didn't need to have the P-powerplant designation.) This homebuilt had given me three years of enjoyable soaring. This winter I am in the process of modifying the wings to fuselage fairings, control hinge seals, etc in order to improve performance. Again, my work will be inspected during my yearly condition inspection. Wayne HP-14 "6F" http://www.soaridaho.com/Schreder "Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe" The Sea Hawk At Wow Way D0t C0m wrote in message ... "es330td" wrote in message ... Browsing controller.com I noticed that there is a category for homebuilt/experimental aircraft. My limited understanding of homebuilt aircraft is that it is an experimental plane, built for the pleasure/education of the builder. The builder of said plane, being the mfr, may work on it or an A&P mechanic can. Or, if you buy it, you can work on it. The builder can do the annual "condition inspection" (assuming the get a repairmans's certificate). A second owner would have to get an A&P, an AI, or the original owner to do the inspections. I didn't think the FAA would allow someone to legally fly an experimental they bought; however, the number of planes on controller indicate that this is allowed or at least not enforced. I am curious then about a few things: It's legal to sell and buy a homebuilt. 1. Are there people who just build kit/plan planes to sell them? Yes. Though, that is not the intent of the regs. 2. Does the FAA simply choose to ignore them? Depends. 3. What responsibilities does the builder have with the plane? Pretty much the same as Cessna or Piper or... You wreck it, your heirs can attempt to sue the builder. 4. As the owner of a homebuilt they didn't build, can the purchaser work on the plane or does it now become like a 172 that must be repaired by an A&P guy? As above, you can do work, but the inspections must be done by an A&P (or AI) so it makes a lot of sense to not do the work without making sure the A&P will sign off on it when the time comes. One would also want to make sure that one's A&P of choice is willing to inspect and sign the work done by the original builder BEFORE putting a money down. Remember - it is likely that the aircraft has never been seen by an A&P... 5. How much can you trust a purchased homebuilt? I know they have to get an airworthiness inspection to fly but that doesn't mean it was built well. Is there a certain minimum level of quality a plane must have to get the certificate? Buyer Beware. The FAA makes sure you have done all the required paperwork. Most homebuilts are very well built. But there are those with flaws. Even if it looks well built, it's possible, for example, that the builder liked to "add stuff" and/or "beef it up a bit" and/or but a larger than original engine and... It wouldn't be the first time a very nice looking homebuilt with all the bells and whistles came out with an empty weight that exceeds the designers intended gross weight. Find someone who has built and flown the type you are looking at to inspect the aircraft with you (along with your choice of A&P). Most common designs have some kind of builders association who can help you out. There are a lot of really nice homebulit aircraft out there. But you (as a buyer) have to do some extra work to make sure you know what you are really getting. Remember - each individual homebuilt aircraft is unique. -- Geoff The Sea Hawk at Wow Way d0t Com remove spaces and make the obvious substitutions to reply by mail When immigration is outlawed, only outlaws will immigrate. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 16:20:11 -0800 (PST), BobR
wrote: I know of a few builders who would probably love to be buried in their plane but NO, it is not necessary. On the issue of trusting a homebuilt aircraft, I would probably be more trusting of most of the homebuilt aircraft that I have seen than many production aircraft, My CFI says the same thing. There are a bunch of homebuilts at the airfield at which I am learning and he speaks very highly of the general quality of them. One of his planes shares a hanger with a very nice Velocity RG (that happens to be for sale) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Matthew Speed" wrote in message
news ![]() On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 16:20:11 -0800 (PST), BobR wrote: I know of a few builders who would probably love to be buried in their plane but NO, it is not necessary. On the issue of trusting a homebuilt aircraft, I would probably be more trusting of most of the homebuilt aircraft that I have seen than many production aircraft, My CFI says the same thing. There are a bunch of homebuilts at the airfield at which I am learning and he speaks very highly of the general quality of them. One of his planes shares a hanger with a very nice Velocity RG (that happens to be for sale) Saw one of those on final approach to Tacoma Narrows airport the other day. Damn if'n they aren't pretty. Like watching Princess Leia coming down final on Waterworld. ![]() Rich S. (from the great Pacific NorthWet) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
BUYING OR SELLING PARTS | RFQAVIATION | Naval Aviation | 0 | November 20th 05 03:11 PM |
Space Homebuilts | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | September 17th 05 08:06 PM |
Homebuilts by State | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 14 | October 15th 03 08:30 PM |