![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The towplane rudder waggle signal has done more harm than good. We
have spent at least ten years trying to educate our pilots about this signal, and we have failed. It is time we got rid of the signal. http://www.ntsb.gov/aviationquery/br...15X11650&key=1 -Pat |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So... What would you have the tow pilot do, release the glider or,
possibly, crash into the trees? Either way, the glider is down. I've been away from soaring for 9 of the previous 10 years, but it's my recollection that the rudder wag was not an official signal - only a suggestion. Maybe it should be made an official signal and tested on BFRs and check rides. "Pat Russell" wrote in message ... The towplane rudder waggle signal has done more harm than good. We have spent at least ten years trying to educate our pilots about this signal, and we have failed. It is time we got rid of the signal. http://www.ntsb.gov/aviationquery/br...15X11650&key=1 -Pat |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Rudder Waggle is part of the standard US Soaring signals.
http://www.soaringsafety.org/prevention/signals.html |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dan Marotta" wrote in message ... So... What would you have the tow pilot do, release the glider or, possibly, crash into the trees? Either way, the glider is down. Require radios and use them. Compared to gliders, they are dirt cheap. I've been away from soaring for 9 of the previous 10 years, but it's my recollection that the rudder wag was not an official signal - only a suggestion. Maybe it should be made an official signal and tested on BFRs and check rides. It's been a few years since I was an active CFIG, but we tested the rudder waggle on every flight review. I don't recall anyone failing to release when they got the waggle except for a few cases when they were briefed immediately before the flight.. As far as I can see, the signal is well intended, but a complete failure. Vaughn |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 22, 2:46*pm, "vaughn" wrote:
"Dan Marotta" wrote in message ... So... *What would you have the tow pilot do, release the glider or, possibly, crash into the trees? *Either way, the glider is down. Require radios and use them. *Compared to gliders, they are dirt cheap. I've been away from soaring for 9 of the previous 10 years, but it's my recollection that the rudder wag was not an official signal - only a suggestion. *Maybe it should be made an official signal and tested on BFRs and check rides. It's been a few years since I was an active CFIG, but we tested the rudder waggle on every flight review. *I don't recall anyone failing to release when they got the waggle except for a few cases when they were briefed immediately before the flight.. *As far as I can see, the signal is well intended, but a complete failure. Vaughn Uh I assume that was an unintended typo and you meant failing to release when they got the rock-off signal? Darryl |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 22, 2:53*pm, Darryl Ramm wrote:
On Jul 22, 2:46*pm, "vaughn" wrote: "Dan Marotta" wrote in message ... So... *What would you have the tow pilot do, release the glider or, possibly, crash into the trees? *Either way, the glider is down. Require radios and use them. *Compared to gliders, they are dirt cheap. I've been away from soaring for 9 of the previous 10 years, but it's my recollection that the rudder wag was not an official signal - only a suggestion. *Maybe it should be made an official signal and tested on BFRs and check rides. It's been a few years since I was an active CFIG, but we tested the rudder waggle on every flight review. *I don't recall anyone failing to release when they got the waggle except for a few cases when they were briefed immediately before the flight.. *As far as I can see, the signal is well intended, but a complete failure. Vaughn Uh I assume that was an unintended typo and you meant failing to release when they got the rock-off signal? Darryl- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No I believe he meant that everyone released by mistake... And this was not even under real emergency pressure. Exactly my point. Ramy |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Isn't everyone missing the cause of this accident and ones like it?
Written, Pre-take-off checklist is all that is needed to prevent this accident from ever happening. It is the most basic of pilot duties........ The pilot made at least 5 obvious (easily preventable) errors leading up to the accident. 1. preflight inspection (usually states spoilers/flaps to take off position) 2. pre take off check list..."spoilers closed and locked" 3. During tow, Left hand should be on, near, behind, spoiler handle to sense unwanted spoiler opening 4. Situational awareness of poor climb should result in immediate spoiler check 5. Pilot should be familiar with signals Pilot should also include "enmergency plan" in take off check list ....planning for emergencies such as rope break, tow plane wave off signal, canopy opening, tow plane loss of power, and spoilers opening (and signal form tow plane)....none of these should cause any major concern if they happen...If the pilot is properly prepared.. Cookie |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Darryl Ramm" wrote in message ... It's been a few years since I was an active CFIG, but we tested the rudder waggle on every flight review. I don't recall anyone failing to release when they got the waggle except for a few cases when they were briefed immediately before the flight.. As far as I can see, the signal is well intended, but a complete failure. Vaughn Uh I assume that was an unintended typo and you meant failing to release when they got the rock-off signal? Nope, I meant just what I said. Virtually all pilots did the wrong thing, (released when the got the rudder waggle) unless they were briefed right before the flight and knew what was going to happen. We would typically do this as an excercise on the first "pattern" flight of the flight review. On the ground, we would then have a productive discussion about that signal Vaughn |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 22, 6:34*pm, "vaughn" wrote:
"Darryl Ramm" wrote in message ... It's been a few years since I was an active CFIG, but we tested the rudder waggle on every flight review. I don't recall anyone failing to release when they got the waggle except for a few cases when they were briefed immediately before the flight.. As far as I can see, the signal is well intended, but a complete failure. Vaughn Uh I assume that was an unintended typo and you meant failing to release when they got the rock-off signal? Nope, I meant just what I said. *Virtually all pilots did the wrong thing, (released when the got the rudder waggle) unless they were briefed right before the flight and knew what was going to happen. *We would typically do this as an excercise on the first "pattern" flight of the flight review. *On the ground, we would then have a productive discussion about that signal Vaughn Thanks. Jeez that is sad. I totally advocate the tow pilot doing nothing if low and that is possible, then radio, then rudder fan if needed.... Darryl |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
If you only engage your brain when in the cockpit you are missing out on reviewing your own flight performances and missing the benefits of visualising and mentally rehearsing vital actions before they are needed. Colin |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rudder waggle | toad | Soaring | 33 | November 21st 07 05:44 AM |
DG Rudder AD - DONE! - Notes from my work | ContestID67 | Soaring | 0 | March 30th 06 07:36 PM |
CH Rudder pedals, why don't they work | wan2fly99 | Simulators | 2 | January 12th 06 12:30 PM |
signal splitter | Tri-Pacer | Home Built | 2 | November 5th 05 09:47 PM |