![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Now that summer has come to Arizona, my oil temp is running about 2/3 of the
way between 180 and red line. My mechanic checked the oil cooler bypass valve and said it was OK, so I had decided to send in the oil cooler for cleaning and service. Checking the engine log for the last time work was done on the cooler, I found an entry about 5 years ago saying the cooler had been cleaned, then the next entry said the oil temp gauge was reading about 20 degrees too high, but there is no entry for corrective action to the oil temp guage, wiring, or sender. Looks like I need to check the gauge system myself for accuracy and probably replace something. Do you just drop the sender into hot water and compare the panel guage reading with a couple of cooking thermometers? If there is a discepancy, is it the sender that should be replaced first, then replace the guage if necessary? -- Regards, Mike http://mywebpage.netscape.com/amountainaero/fspic1.html |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 5 Jun 2004 18:11:32 -0700, "Mike Noel"
wrote: Now that summer has come to Arizona, my oil temp is running about 2/3 of the way between 180 and red line. My mechanic checked the oil cooler bypass valve and said it was OK, so I had decided to send in the oil cooler for cleaning and service. Checking the engine log for the last time work was done on the cooler, I found an entry about 5 years ago saying the cooler had been cleaned, then the next entry said the oil temp gauge was reading about 20 degrees too high, but there is no entry for corrective action to the oil temp guage, wiring, or sender. Looks like I need to check the gauge system myself for accuracy and probably replace something. Do you just drop the sender into hot water and compare the panel guage reading with a couple of cooking thermometers? If there is a discepancy, is it the sender that should be replaced first, then replace the guage if necessary? I need to do the same thing with my bird. I don;t have all the answers, but am planning on using engine oil instead of water. It will allow me to bring the temp up to 250, or 300 so I have a better idea of what temps may be affecting the sender. If you have a sender you can swap with try that so you know which part is defective. If you don't (like me) I plan on swapping the sender first cause it's cheaper than a gauge. HTH. z |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Boiling water won't hurt the sender, and you know that's exactly 212 deg.
zatatime wrote: On Sat, 5 Jun 2004 18:11:32 -0700, "Mike Noel" wrote: Now that summer has come to Arizona, my oil temp is running about 2/3 of the way between 180 and red line. My mechanic checked the oil cooler bypass valve and said it was OK, so I had decided to send in the oil cooler for cleaning and service. Checking the engine log for the last time work was done on the cooler, I found an entry about 5 years ago saying the cooler had been cleaned, then the next entry said the oil temp gauge was reading about 20 degrees too high, but there is no entry for corrective action to the oil temp guage, wiring, or sender. Looks like I need to check the gauge system myself for accuracy and probably replace something. Do you just drop the sender into hot water and compare the panel guage reading with a couple of cooking thermometers? If there is a discepancy, is it the sender that should be replaced first, then replace the guage if necessary? I need to do the same thing with my bird. I don;t have all the answers, but am planning on using engine oil instead of water. It will allow me to bring the temp up to 250, or 300 so I have a better idea of what temps may be affecting the sender. If you have a sender you can swap with try that so you know which part is defective. If you don't (like me) I plan on swapping the sender first cause it's cheaper than a gauge. HTH. z |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rip wrote:
Boiling water won't hurt the sender, and you know that's exactly 212 deg. Only at an absolute pressure of 29.921; but there are lots of charts/caclulators on the Internet to correct for pressure and altitude. -- Jim Pennino Remove -spam-sux to reply. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 5 Jun 2004 18:11:32 -0700, "Mike Noel"
wrote: Now that summer has come to Arizona, my oil temp is running about 2/3 of the way between 180 and red line. My mechanic checked the oil cooler bypass valve and said it was OK, so I had decided to send in the oil cooler for cleaning and service. Checking the engine log for the last time work was done on the cooler, I found an entry about 5 years ago saying the cooler had been cleaned, then the next entry said the oil temp gauge was reading about 20 degrees too high, but there is no entry for corrective action to the oil temp guage, wiring, or sender. Looks like I need to check the gauge system myself for accuracy and probably replace something. Do you just drop the sender into hot water and compare the panel guage reading with a couple of cooking thermometers? If there is a discepancy, is it the sender that should be replaced first, then replace the guage if necessary? Unless things have changed substantially, the sender/gage setup on the older Pipers is a real pain. The sender & gage p/n/vendor/working resistance has changed over the years, and Piper didn't useta be much help in sorting it out. The first step would indeed be to get a replacement crush gasket and yank the sender and boil it. If the boiling water trick (don't forget to ground the sender) reveals an indicating problem, the easiest thing to do is contact Air Parts of Lock Haven. http://www.airpartsoflockhaven.com/ Again, it's been a few years, but they were quite helpful in sorting out the mess. It is possible that the wrong sender has been installed at some point, or that the "right" sender for your gage is no longer available. In either case, they can calibrate your gage and "match" it to either a new sender, or your sender if it is functional. TC |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rip wrote:
Boiling water won't hurt the sender, and you know that's exactly 212 deg. Not up here at altitude you don't ![]() Oil also lets you check the vernatherm while you have the stove out (mine proved to be defective) without tossing that particular hunk of metal into a water bath... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thats just the summer heat.
I fly a turbo arrow, currently in las vegas, moving to phoenix in about 3 weeks. my mechanic says as long as I dont redline the temps its not a problem, but at different altitudes I do pull the power back a little and level off to cool the engine down some. Mike Noel wrote: Now that summer has come to Arizona, my oil temp is running about 2/3 of the way between 180 and red line. My mechanic checked the oil cooler bypass valve and said it was OK, so I had decided to send in the oil cooler for cleaning and service. Checking the engine log for the last time work was done on the cooler, I found an entry about 5 years ago saying the cooler had been cleaned, then the next entry said the oil temp gauge was reading about 20 degrees too high, but there is no entry for corrective action to the oil temp guage, wiring, or sender. Looks like I need to check the gauge system myself for accuracy and probably replace something. Do you just drop the sender into hot water and compare the panel guage reading with a couple of cooking thermometers? If there is a discepancy, is it the sender that should be replaced first, then replace the guage if necessary? -- Regards, Mike http://mywebpage.netscape.com/amountainaero/fspic1.html |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Noel" wrote in message ... Now that summer has come to Arizona, my oil temp is running about 2/3 of the way between 180 and red line. My mechanic checked the oil cooler bypass valve and said it was OK, so I had decided to send in the oil cooler for cleaning and service. Checking the engine log for the last time work was done on the cooler, I found an entry about 5 years ago saying the cooler had been cleaned, then the next entry said the oil temp gauge was reading about 20 degrees too high, but there is no entry for corrective action to the oil temp guage, wiring, or sender. Looks like I need to check the gauge system myself for accuracy and probably replace something. Do you just drop the sender into hot water and compare the panel guage reading with a couple of cooking thermometers? If there is a discepancy, is it the sender that should be replaced first, then replace the guage if necessary? -- Regards, Mike http://mywebpage.netscape.com/amountainaero/fspic1.html Hi Mike You can check the calibration of the gauge with a precision resistor in place of the sender for virtually no effort past finding the appropriate resistor. I can check what it was in my Seminole but I don't have the book at my office and that was years ago and YMMV. The right engine on N2196B always appeared to have a higher oil temp. I spent much more on mechanics than it cost me to find out the gauge was wrong; I still have an oil cooler in my garage. If the gauge looks right then immerse the sender in oil on a hot plate with a real thermometer and check it accurately. Blue skies! H. H. Adam Stevens CP AS&MEL IA ex N2196B PA44-180 and a damned nice bird she was |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: 1988 "Aces High" (Military Airplanes) Hardcover Edition Book | J.R. Sinclair | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | August 23rd 04 05:18 AM |
Fwd: [BD4] Source of HIGH CHTs on O-320 and O-360 FOUND! | Bruce A. Frank | Home Built | 1 | July 4th 04 07:28 PM |
World War II Flying 'Ace' Salutes Racial Progress, By Gerry J. Gilmore | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 2 | February 22nd 04 03:33 AM |
MT. DIABLO HIGH SCHOOL CONCORD, CA PHOTOS | MT. DIABLO HIGH SCHOOL PHOTOS | Home Built | 1 | October 13th 03 03:35 AM |
High Flight NOTAM | Kirk Stant | Military Aviation | 1 | September 10th 03 03:31 AM |