![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What is the minimum legal distance (altitude) to fly VFR under a Class B
"wedding cake"? CLE has a 1900 ft floor at the north side by Lake Erie and I have flown at 1800 to go around CLE. I was not talking to CLE so I don't know if they objected. Today I was coming around CLE decending IFR. When in VMS I cancelled IFR and remained on squak for advisories. The controller wanted me at 3000 when under a 4000 ft designated altitude. Was he just being safe for his own good or is 1000 ft suggested as the minimum buffer? I know, I should have ask him but the frequency was pretty busy. Chuck |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() PaulaJay1 wrote: What is the minimum legal distance (altitude) to fly VFR under a Class B "wedding cake"? Whatever the floor is. CLE has a 1900 ft floor at the north side by Lake Erie and I have flown at 1800 to go around CLE. You could fly it at 1900. Hit a bump and go to 1901, however, you're illegal, but the controller won't know it. The typical mode-C transponder reports altitude in 100' increments and changes readings at about the 50' level; that is, at 1949', your transponder should report 1900' and at 1950' it should report 2000'. Dunno about you, but my encoder isn't that accurate. Still, it won't be precise enough to get me busted at 1' over the floor. George Patterson If a man gets into a fight 3,000 miles away from home, he *had* to have been looking for it. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you are VFR, you can be within 1 foot of that space, and be legal. AFAIK.
However, if you are using radar services, they will often fly you at an altitude for their own reasons, whatever they may be (always good reasons, but varying in importance). I have had controllers argue with me over this, so I know it varies around the country. The rules and regs are the same, but geography, weather, and habit have pretty large influences on how they are applied. You can call them and get an answer why they do that in your area if you really want to know. Used to be you could go tour the facility and sit with a controller to learn, but they supposedly stopped doing that. I haven't sat with a controller in a dozen years, so I suspect things have changed alot and would like to do it again. Legally, you could have told them you wanted another altitude, since you were VFR, like 3500, but legally, he could cancel you since you canceled IFR as well. So the rules are one thing, and how they are applied can vary. Mostly, I go along because I figure it makes a big difference to them, and a little one to me. Whenever I have asked for a different altitude (due to obscuration or turbulence, or heat), I usually hear "cleared VFR under 4000 feet" - or whatever applies. Once though, I got a nice request/advice to stay where assigned due to traffic. I was happy to bump along at 1500 rather than try to stay cooler and smoother if it meant avoiding an unwanted meeting with a regional jet ![]() "PaulaJay1" wrote in message ... What is the minimum legal distance (altitude) to fly VFR under a Class B "wedding cake"? CLE has a 1900 ft floor at the north side by Lake Erie and I have flown at 1800 to go around CLE. I was not talking to CLE so I don't know if they objected. Today I was coming around CLE decending IFR. When in VMS I cancelled IFR and remained on squak for advisories. The controller wanted me at 3000 when under a 4000 ft designated altitude. Was he just being safe for his own good or is 1000 ft suggested as the minimum buffer? I know, I should have ask him but the frequency was pretty busy. Chuck |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "PaulaJay1" wrote in message ... What is the minimum legal distance (altitude) to fly VFR under a Class B "wedding cake"? No such mimimum distance exists. CLE has a 1900 ft floor at the north side by Lake Erie and I have flown at 1800 to go around CLE. I was not talking to CLE so I don't know if they objected. There's nothing for them to object to. Today I was coming around CLE decending IFR. When in VMS I cancelled IFR and remained on squak for advisories. The controller wanted me at 3000 when under a 4000 ft designated altitude. Was he just being safe for his own good or is 1000 ft suggested as the minimum buffer? Outside of Class B airspace he has no responsibility for separation and cannot require VFR aircraft to operate at any particular altitude. Of course, other regulations can come into play here, such as VFR cruising altitudes. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dude" wrote in message ... However, if you are using radar services, they will often fly you at an altitude for their own reasons, whatever they may be (always good reasons, but varying in importance). I have had controllers argue with me over this, so I know it varies around the country. The rules and regs are the same, but geography, weather, and habit have pretty large influences on how they are applied. It doesn't vary at all. If you're outside of the Class B airspace ATC has no authority to assign altitudes to VFR aircraft. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Steven P. McNicoll wrote: "Dude" wrote in message ... However, if you are using radar services, they will often fly you at an altitude for their own reasons, whatever they may be (always good reasons, but varying in importance). I have had controllers argue with me over this, so I know it varies around the country. The rules and regs are the same, but geography, weather, and habit have pretty large influences on how they are applied. It doesn't vary at all. If you're outside of the Class B airspace ATC has no authority to assign altitudes to VFR aircraft. Nor any obligation to continue radar services to said VFR aircraft. Dave |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave S" wrote in message link.net... It doesn't vary at all. If you're outside of the Class B airspace ATC has no authority to assign altitudes to VFR aircraft. Nor any obligation to continue radar services to said VFR aircraft. Actually, there is. FAA Order 7110.65P Air Traffic Control Chapter 2. General Control Section 1. General 2-1-1. ATC SERVICE The primary purpose of the ATC system is to prevent a collision between aircraft operating in the system and to organize and expedite the flow of traffic. In addition to its primary function, the ATC system has the capability to provide (with certain limitations) additional services. The ability to provide additional services is limited by many factors, such as the volume of traffic, frequency congestion, quality of radar, controller workload, higher priority duties, and the pure physical inability to scan and detect those situations that fall in this category. It is recognized that these services cannot be provided in cases in which the provision of services is precluded by the above factors. Consistent with the aforementioned conditions, controllers shall provide additional service procedures to the extent permitted by higher priority duties and other circumstances. The provision of additional services is not optional on the part of the controller, but rather is required when the work situation permits. Provide air traffic control service in accordance with the procedures and minima in this order except when: a. A deviation is necessary to conform with ICAO Documents, National Rules of the Air, or special agreements where the U.S. provides air traffic control service in airspace outside the U.S. and its possessions or: NOTE- Pilots are required to abide by CFRs or other applicable regulations regardless of the application of any procedure or minima in this order. b. Other procedures/minima are prescribed in a letter of agreement, FAA directive, or a military document, or: NOTE- These procedures may include altitude reservations, air refueling, fighter interceptor operations, law enforcement, etc. REFERENCE- FAAO 7110.65, Procedural Letters of Agreement, Para 1-1-8. c. A deviation is necessary to assist an aircraft when an emergency has been declared. REFERENCE- FAAO 7110.65, Safety Alert, Para 2-1-6. FAAO 7110.65, Emergencies, Chapter 10. FAAO 7110.65, Merging Target Procedures, Para 5-1-8. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
CLE has a 1900 ft floor at the north side by Lake Erie and I have flown at 1800 to go around CLE. You could fly it at 1900. Hit a bump and go to 1901, however, you're illegal, but the controller won't know it. Isn't the stated altitude included in class B? So, nitpicking, you'd have to fly at 1899 to be legal, unless there's this "+" sign on the chart... Happy flying, Patrick |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There can be a lot of VFR traffic cruising around under the B space. It's
a good idea to just talk to ATC and get their help. "PaulaJay1" wrote in message ... What is the minimum legal distance (altitude) to fly VFR under a Class B "wedding cake"? CLE has a 1900 ft floor at the north side by Lake Erie and I have flown at 1800 to go around CLE. I was not talking to CLE so I don't know if they objected. Today I was coming around CLE decending IFR. When in VMS I cancelled IFR and remained on squak for advisories. The controller wanted me at 3000 when under a 4000 ft designated altitude. Was he just being safe for his own good or is 1000 ft suggested as the minimum buffer? I know, I should have ask him but the frequency was pretty busy. Chuck |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Must the PLANE be IFR-equipped to fly over17,500? | john smith | Home Built | 11 | August 27th 04 02:29 AM |
Ultralight Club Bylaws - Warning Long Post | MrHabilis | Home Built | 0 | June 11th 04 05:07 PM |
Mountain flying instruction: McCall, Idaho, Colorado too! | [email protected] | General Aviation | 0 | March 26th 04 11:24 PM |
Progress on Flying Car | Steve Dufour | General Aviation | 5 | December 19th 03 03:48 PM |
FA: WEATHER FLYING: A PRACTICAL BOOK ON FLYING | The Ink Company | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | November 5th 03 12:07 AM |