![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Me again,
Va seems to be only intended to protect against excessive positive load factors. What about negative g's? Can I find a Va for negative design load factors (-1.52 g) for the C172SP anywhere? Reason I am asking is that I want to try the "floating pencil" trick next time I fly but I don't want to shove the stick fully forward for fear of breaking something. I am not looking to induce negative g's, only zero g's and zero lift. Any pointers on entry speed and power settings? Is it easier to perform if you induce a gradual +1 g steep climb similar to a departure stall maneuver, then upon hearing the stall horn, give it good nudge forward on the stick? I've heard that your airspeed may indicate well below stall, but again, your stall speed does approach zero as your load factor goes to zero. Likewise, would you prefer to pull 2 positive g's in a pull-up maneuver or a, say, 60 deg. bank? Frankly, I am not too familiar with the former so I might do something undesirable. Aside from my stall speed going up to something like 68 kts. clean (Va ~ 100 kts), you'd see your airspeed quickly dwindling while pulling up. I think it'd be fruitless to add in power since heck, you're not maintaining altitude and besides, you probably don't have any excess power anyway to do that. Neither am I familiar with the mechanics of loops so it'd be wiser to leave that alone. Perhaps the 60 deg. bank is more reasonable to have some fun. Would you try to hold altitude with backpressure and power or just leave the plane to dive and speed up in the spiral, with a recovery before Vne? I think the maneuver would be more innocuous with power-off a-la-emergency-descent style. Again, I've never done a 60 deg. bank...so I should probably leave that alone too until I try it with a passenger...oops..i mean CFI. Seriously, if someone has something to suggest that's fun and safe, within normal operating range and category, please suggest. It's a buddy's bday soon and he wants to go up. Again, I am not looking for doing anything aerobatic. Alright, I can see the flames and derision coming from the mainland ![]() May you have a peaceful week with no stress, Alex |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you want to do this sort of thing, get some aerobatic instruction.
And do it in an acro aircraft. As you describe what you want to do, it has a definite "Hey, watch this" ring to it. It's POSSIBLE to do acro in a normal/utility category plane - as Bob Hoover has shown - but you have to be VERY good if you're not going to break anything. (Also it's illegal unless you reclassify the aircraft as experimental, which brings a whole lot of other restrictions). You should definitely not try ANY of this stuff unless you have done some proper spin recovery training. A 172 is legal and safe to spin (if loaded correctly) but if you haven't experienced a spin there is a serious risk that you will panic. None of us wants to read about you in an NTSB report. That said... a 2G 60 degree banked turn is no big deal. Presumably you have already done 45 degress (1.4G). Bank a bit further and pull hard enough to maintain level flight. In a 172 it requires a fairly strong pull but no huge deal (unlike the 182). Use the AI and altimeter to keep track of what you're doing. Be VERY careful not to bank a degree more than 60 degrees. At 70 degrees you are at the limit of what the plane can take. Floating in a 172 will stop the engine, and if you go even slightly negative for more than a fraction of a second, will also cover the belly of the plane with oil. This will not make you popular with the FBO. As long as you push gently and stop before you hit zero G, nothing bad will happen. As soon as you start doing things like this you risk stalling and spinning. You need to have an instinctive recovery action from an incipient spin (opposite rudder), which takes a bit of practice - with a spin-experienced instructor sitting beside you. Get some acro training. It's loads of fun and will mean you can do "extreme" non-acro stuff like this with no risk John "Koopas Ly" wrote in message om... Me again, Va seems to be only intended to protect against excessive positive load factors. What about negative g's? Can I find a Va for negative design load factors (-1.52 g) for the C172SP anywhere? Reason I am asking is that I want to try the "floating pencil" trick next time I fly but I don't want to shove the stick fully forward for fear of breaking something. I am not looking to induce negative g's, only zero g's and zero lift. Any pointers on entry speed and power settings? Is it easier to perform if you induce a gradual +1 g steep climb similar to a departure stall maneuver, then upon hearing the stall horn, give it good nudge forward on the stick? I've heard that your airspeed may indicate well below stall, but again, your stall speed does approach zero as your load factor goes to zero. Likewise, would you prefer to pull 2 positive g's in a pull-up maneuver or a, say, 60 deg. bank? Frankly, I am not too familiar with the former so I might do something undesirable. Aside from my stall speed going up to something like 68 kts. clean (Va ~ 100 kts), you'd see your airspeed quickly dwindling while pulling up. I think it'd be fruitless to add in power since heck, you're not maintaining altitude and besides, you probably don't have any excess power anyway to do that. Neither am I familiar with the mechanics of loops so it'd be wiser to leave that alone. Perhaps the 60 deg. bank is more reasonable to have some fun. Would you try to hold altitude with backpressure and power or just leave the plane to dive and speed up in the spiral, with a recovery before Vne? I think the maneuver would be more innocuous with power-off a-la-emergency-descent style. Again, I've never done a 60 deg. bank...so I should probably leave that alone too until I try it with a passenger...oops..i mean CFI. Seriously, if someone has something to suggest that's fun and safe, within normal operating range and category, please suggest. It's a buddy's bday soon and he wants to go up. Again, I am not looking for doing anything aerobatic. Alright, I can see the flames and derision coming from the mainland ![]() May you have a peaceful week with no stress, Alex |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good response, John.
The note about the oil on the belly is the mark of someone who knows. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Get acro instruction in a Pitts, Decathlon, etc. Doing what you want in a
172, while maybe possible, is dangerous and quite honestly, a little sad. It's like trying to race a Geo Metro. I've got nothing against the 172, it's just not well suited for what you want. The FBO I rent from rents a Decathlon for $10/hr more than their SP's. I'm sure you can find one for about what you pay for the 172. BTW - your comment "stall horn, give it good nudge forward on the stick"... a 172SP doesn't have a stick, it has a wheel. Sticks are for acro's, a 172 isn't an acro. "Koopas Ly" wrote in message om... Me again, Va seems to be only intended to protect against excessive positive load factors. What about negative g's? Can I find a Va for negative design load factors (-1.52 g) for the C172SP anywhere? Reason I am asking is that I want to try the "floating pencil" trick next time I fly but I don't want to shove the stick fully forward for fear of breaking something. I am not looking to induce negative g's, only zero g's and zero lift. Any pointers on entry speed and power settings? Is it easier to perform if you induce a gradual +1 g steep climb similar to a departure stall maneuver, then upon hearing the stall horn, give it good nudge forward on the stick? I've heard that your airspeed may indicate well below stall, but again, your stall speed does approach zero as your load factor goes to zero. Likewise, would you prefer to pull 2 positive g's in a pull-up maneuver or a, say, 60 deg. bank? Frankly, I am not too familiar with the former so I might do something undesirable. Aside from my stall speed going up to something like 68 kts. clean (Va ~ 100 kts), you'd see your airspeed quickly dwindling while pulling up. I think it'd be fruitless to add in power since heck, you're not maintaining altitude and besides, you probably don't have any excess power anyway to do that. Neither am I familiar with the mechanics of loops so it'd be wiser to leave that alone. Perhaps the 60 deg. bank is more reasonable to have some fun. Would you try to hold altitude with backpressure and power or just leave the plane to dive and speed up in the spiral, with a recovery before Vne? I think the maneuver would be more innocuous with power-off a-la-emergency-descent style. Again, I've never done a 60 deg. bank...so I should probably leave that alone too until I try it with a passenger...oops..i mean CFI. Seriously, if someone has something to suggest that's fun and safe, within normal operating range and category, please suggest. It's a buddy's bday soon and he wants to go up. Again, I am not looking for doing anything aerobatic. Alright, I can see the flames and derision coming from the mainland ![]() May you have a peaceful week with no stress, Alex |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Can I find a Va for negative design load factors (-1.52 g) for the
C172SP anywhere? I think I calculated Vs for a negative AOA to be about 60 knots in a 172. That would put Va at about 74 knots. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Actually it's the mark of someone who has been warned MANY times
by his acro instructor :-) (so far! - :-) that is ). But now I'm flying the Decathlon - yippee! - which has inverted systems. John "EDR" wrote in message ... Good response, John. The note about the oil on the belly is the mark of someone who knows. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Rich Stowell" wrote in message
om... Like many speeds in an airlane, maneuvering speed, Va, is related to the wings-level, stall speed Vso by the square root of the g-load. I have a horrible premonition that we're about to rehash the "Overweight takeoff" thread again..... -- Dr. Tony Cox Citrus Controls Inc. e-mail: http://CitrusControls.com/ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article 1070298215.906416@sj-nntpcache-3, John Harper
wrote: Actually it's the mark of someone who has been warned MANY times by his acro instructor :-) (so far! - :-) that is ). But now I'm flying the Decathlon - yippee! - which has inverted systems. Is your slobber tube vented for cold weather operation? Or, do you live where it stays warm? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | January 1st 05 07:29 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | March 1st 04 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | January 1st 04 06:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | December 1st 03 06:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | November 1st 03 06:27 AM |