A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The MIT guys get it



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 18th 03, 08:17 PM
Bob Chilcoat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The MIT guys get it

In the long tradition of putting "stuff" on top of the dome at MIT, how
about this one for the Centenial of Flight:
http://home.comcast.net/~jwisnia18/MIT_Gloat.jpg

--
Bob (Chief Pilot, White Knuckle Airways)



  #2  
Old December 18th 03, 08:32 PM
EDR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


I wish they had taken it with a telephoto lens for a closer shot.
  #3  
Old December 18th 03, 09:09 PM
Marco Leon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

your wish has been granted:

www.mit.edu


"EDR" wrote in message
...

I wish they had taken it with a telephoto lens for a closer shot.




Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
  #4  
Old December 18th 03, 09:37 PM
EDR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"EDR" wrote in message
...
I wish they had taken it with a telephoto lens for a closer shot.


In article , Marco Leon wrote:
your wish has been granted:
www.mit.edu


Thanks!
I see it conforms to the high engineering standards I would expect from
such time constraints.
  #5  
Old December 18th 03, 11:21 PM
Brian Burger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, EDR wrote:


I wish they had taken it with a telephoto lens for a closer shot.


This article has a slightly closer shot:
http://www.thebostonchannel.com/news...83/detail.html

http://news.google.com is great; I just googled "MIT prank" & got several
links...

Brian.
  #6  
Old December 19th 03, 03:41 AM
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 15:21:27 -0800, Brian Burger
wrote in Message-Id:
.ca:

This article has a slightly closer shot:
http://www.thebostonchannel.com/news...83/detail.html


Yes. Very slightly, and it tries to install Avenue A and MediaPlex
spy programs along with 2 or 3 pop-up ads. :-(
  #7  
Old December 19th 03, 04:52 AM
hlongworth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bob,
Don't forget that there are gals at MIT too ;-)
Here is the link to more pictures of this year's hack
http://hacks.mit.edu/Hacks/by_year/2003/wright_flyer/
If you have the time check out the hack gallery. There are several
books and articles on MIT hacks and pranks.
  #8  
Old December 19th 03, 05:15 AM
Brian Burger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Larry Dighera wrote:

On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 15:21:27 -0800, Brian Burger
wrote in Message-Id:
.ca:

This article has a slightly closer shot:
http://www.thebostonchannel.com/news...83/detail.html


Yes. Very slightly, and it tries to install Avenue A and MediaPlex
spy programs along with 2 or 3 pop-up ads. :-(


Wow, the things you miss when you avoid IE & have a firewall...

Sorry about that; the official MIT page that someone else posted has much
better photos anyway!

Brian.
  #9  
Old December 19th 03, 06:03 AM
Snowbird
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

EDR wrote in message ...
Thanks!


I love it! Great hack -- one of the best! And a good gesture
from MIT admin to leave it all day. Gotta love the attention to
detail (the pilot figure and the FAA airworthiness certificate,
anachronism not withstanding)

Here's another link with more pics:
http://hacks.mit.edu/Hacks/by_year/2...formation.html

I see it conforms to the high engineering standards I would expect from
such time constraints.


It's not just the time. The engineering is probably pretty solid --
but its goal was to produce something which could be transported
through relatively inaccessable confined spaces in a minimal time,
set up readily by a minimal crew working in a small space at heights,
and readily secured from falling off said small space in strong
winds. Not something engineered to fly or to resemble the Wright
Bros construction.

You'd never know it from the quantity and complexity of the stuff
which gets perched up there, but the Institute does not make the
top of the Great Dome easy to access. The perpetrators didn't just
haul it up a freight elevator and push it out a hatch.

Great hack.
Sydney
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
These Guys Should Be Looking Forward Chris Military Aviation 0 October 15th 03 02:09 AM
These Guys Should Be Looking Forward Chris Aviation Marketplace 0 October 15th 03 02:09 AM
I **warned** you guys that if you didn't shape up... Jim Home Built 44 September 28th 03 06:10 PM
I **warned** you guys that if you didn't shape up... Jim Owning 4 August 7th 03 11:55 AM
You guys were right -- thanks! Jay Honeck Piloting 27 July 28th 03 10:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.