![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
I am considering an upgrade for my ASW-20 and would like to know more about the ASH-26E. I am interested in every aspect of the glider (comfort, maintenance, ease of operation, etc) and mainly about performance as a glider. I have some time on the ASW-27. From my research, it seems that the performance would be similar to the ASW-27 in climb and cruise What about your experience? How does the ASH-26E compare to the ASW-27 in climb, cruise, control harmony, etc? Any experience flying with an ASG-29/Ventus 2c(x)/DG-800 in the same conditions? How did the ASH-26E do in comparison? Being an older design, I expect it to have less performance than the newer designs, but by how much? Would it really be a pilot thing in a competition? I fly in the East (Quebec) where conditions are pretty weak (a 4kts average day is a really good day, usually 1.5kts to 2kts) and I am starting at regional/national competition. Thanks, gabriel |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/20/2012 6:49 PM, Gabriel Duford wrote:
Hi, I am considering an upgrade for my ASW-20 and would like to know more about the ASH-26E. I am interested in every aspect of the glider (comfort, maintenance, ease of operation, etc) and mainly about performance as a glider. I have some time on the ASW-27. From my research, it seems that the performance would be similar to the ASW-27 in climb and cruise What about your experience? How does the ASH-26E compare to the ASW-27 in climb, cruise, control harmony, etc? Any experience flying with an ASG-29/Ventus 2c(x)/DG-800 in the same conditions? How did the ASH-26E do in comparison? Being an older design, I expect it to have less performance than the newer designs, but by how much? Would it really be a pilot thing in a competition? I fly in the East (Quebec) where conditions are pretty weak (a 4kts average day is a really good day, usually 1.5kts to 2kts) and I am starting at regional/national competition. There is active ASH 26 E owners group, now also serving the ASH 31 Mi (the replacement for the ASH 26 E model) and other Wankel powered Schleicher gliders. You can join the group here, then ask questions and search the archives: http://groups.google.com/group/ASH-26E You should also join this group, a general group for self-launching sailplanes: http://motorgliders.org Here are some short answers - be sure to explore these on the 26E group, where other owners can give you replies based on their experience. ASW-27, ASW 20 vs ASH 26 E: My experience when flying with ASW 27s is the two gliders are very similar in performance. I haven't flown an ASW 27, but I had an ASW 20 B before the ASH 26 E, and they handled almost identically, though the ASH 26 E was slightly slower in roll. Comfort was the same or better. It glides noticeably better than the ASW 20, however. ASG-29 vs ASH 26 E: the 29 is clearly better in climb and glide than the ASH 26 E, as you would expect from a newer design with significantly higher aspect ratio. DG-800/Ventus 2CM vs ASH 26 E: the gliders seem identical in performance, based on flying with many of them over the years. I'm not familiar with the latest versions of the Ventus 2, but I think comparing the OLC or other handicap systems would give you a good idea. Flying a self-launcher in competition in weak conditions will probably put you at a disadvantage to same/similar unpowered gliders, as the motor means you are, effectively, flying with a half load of ballast that you can not drop. Even so, my experience is you are no worse off than most unballasted 15 meter gliders. An ASG 29 will have a definite advantage in weak conditions, of course. In stronger conditions, the weight of the motor is not a handicap. The advantage goes to the self-launchers (and sustainers) on the days you don't fly competitions, because you will be willing to fly on those weak days, and fly cross-country, when most other pilots will sit on the ground or stay close to the airport, because they don't want to risk a retrieve. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) - "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation Mar/2004" Much of what you need to know tinyurl.com/yfs7tnz |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, September 20, 2012 6:49:18 PM UTC-7, Gabriel Duford wrote:
Hi, I am considering an upgrade for my ASW-20 and would like to know more about the ASH-26E. I am interested in every aspect of the glider (comfort, maintenance, ease of operation, etc) and mainly about performance as a glider. I have some time on the ASW-27. From my research, it seems that the performance would be similar to the ASW-27 in climb and cruise What about your experience? How does the ASH-26E compare to the ASW-27 in climb, cruise, control harmony, etc? Any experience flying with an ASG-29/Ventus 2c(x)/DG-800 in the same conditions? How did the ASH-26E do in comparison? Being an older design, I expect it to have less performance than the newer designs, but by how much? Would it really be a pilot thing in a competition? I fly in the East (Quebec) where conditions are pretty weak (a 4kts average day is a really good day, usually 1.5kts to 2kts) and I am starting at regional/national competition. Thanks, gabriel I have found the performance of my 26E to be comparable to DG 800 or Ventus 2C at the same wing loading. Maybe slightly better than a ASW27 (at the same wing loading). This is based on numerous 40 - 60 mile side-by-side glides with those three types. I have had no glides with a 29 or 31. For light conditions you will have a higher wing loading than the lighter non-engined gliders. However if you remove the engine from the ASH26E (easily done and still with proper CG balance) it will out climb almost anything. I flew once that way and climbed right up past some modern 15 meter ships, circling inside them at around 38 knots. The cockpit is quite comfortable, especially for a tall person. I can't get the canopy closed on a 27. The fuselage on a 26 is about 4" longer in the cockpit. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FAI Evaluation Testers Wanted! | Judy Ruprecht | Soaring | 5 | September 5th 11 10:38 AM |
A Critical Evaluation of the F22 | john smith[_2_] | Piloting | 10 | May 27th 07 06:02 AM |
Software available for testing and evaluation. | Greg Siemon | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | November 8th 05 02:28 AM |
Corrosion Evaluation Help | Dick | Home Built | 3 | July 15th 05 02:51 AM |
Evaluation of Bush the Pilot | BUFDRVR | Military Aviation | 17 | February 23rd 04 10:44 PM |