![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Any ideas on how usage fees would be processed (are processed in Europe)?
Does the system automatically track what each tail number uses every month and send the owner a bill? I have a plane without a radio, so I guess I can save on a lot of the fees if they show up. To the air traffic system, I am just a nameless skin paint that flies by in complete and blessed silence. Danny Deger |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Danny Deger wrote:
Any ideas on how usage fees would be processed (are processed in Europe)? Does the system automatically track what each tail number uses every month and send the owner a bill? I have a plane without a radio, so I guess I can save on a lot of the fees if they show up. To the air traffic system, I am just a nameless skin paint that flies by in complete and blessed silence. Danny Deger Not that I think it is going to pass this time around but I can't think of a single one of the proposed useage fees that is currently being proposed (other than the increase in AvGas tax) that would affect you anyway. Since you don't have a radio I doubt you are flying in the airports that will have a fee and you certainly aren't flying IFR. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don't worry about it. User fees are dead. No chance whatsoever.
Danny Deger wrote: Any ideas on how usage fees would be processed (are processed in Europe)? Does the system automatically track what each tail number uses every month and send the owner a bill? I have a plane without a radio, so I guess I can save on a lot of the fees if they show up. To the air traffic system, I am just a nameless skin paint that flies by in complete and blessed silence. Danny Deger |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 09:07:43 -0600, Newps wrote
in : Don't worry about it. User fees are dead. No chance whatsoever. USER FEE PROPOSAL DEAD? Rep. Todd Tiahrt, R-Kan., is close to declaring the FAA's proposal to impose user fees on general aviation dead. "I think we've finally gotten the stake out and are about to drive it through user fees," he told The Wichita Eagle's editorial board last week. Tiahrt told the Eagle brass that he's made fighting the funding proposal his top priority and enlisted the support of other members of Congress to defeat the plan. On the Eagle's editorial board's blog (http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/...against_.html), Tiahrt's tenacity was applauded but it appears that not everyone in aviation-centric Wichita thinks user fees are a bad idea. http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archive...ll.html#194890 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sectional Usage Poll | Daniel L. Lieberman | Piloting | 45 | December 24th 04 03:35 PM |
Payment for Airspace usage | John Smith | Soaring | 9 | September 14th 04 08:03 PM |
Strobe light usage | Roger Long | Piloting | 4 | August 7th 04 04:21 PM |
Oil usage | GE | Owning | 14 | May 20th 04 07:22 AM |
me-109 overall "76" combat usage? | old hoodoo | Military Aviation | 9 | December 16th 03 12:55 AM |