![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Corky Scott wrote:
The folk etymology from deduced is not documented in the OED or any other historical dictionary. Dead reckoning is navigation without stellar observation. With stellar observation, you are "live", working with the stars and the movement of the planet. With logs, compasses, clocks, but no sky, you are working "dead". Thanks for looking that up, Corky. Another explanation I've heard is reckoning against something dead in the water (i.e. not under sail), but that doesn't sound entirely convincing either. I wonder if it has any relationship to the phrase "dead ahead". All the best, David |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gary Drescher wrote:
Yup. Also, "deduced reckoning" would be redundant, as reckoning is inherently deductive. The Count on Sesame Street can reckon inductively: "one, two, three, THREE COOKIES!!! BWAAA HAAA HAA!!!" All the best, David |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yup. Also, "deduced reckoning" would be redundant, as reckoning is
inherently deductive. "Deduction" means going from the universal to the particular, as in the classic example used in logic textbooks: All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Ergo, Socrates is mortal. INduction is the process of drawing inferences from PARTICULAR OBSERVATIONS, as in:: Socrates died. Aristotle died. Ptolemy died. Ergo, all men die. Dead reckoning starts with "inputting" particulars--the airspeed of MY airplane, the heading I AM going to fly TODAY, the CURRENT wind, and therefore, it is an example of induction, not deduction. Science is an inductive process. Statistics is inductive. Philososphy and theology are deductive. I suspect, but without any supporting evidence, that "dead" reckoning comes from the use of "dead' in phrases such as "Dead right." "Dead on." "Dead center." Meaning, "exact." Dead reckoning is EXACT in that, provided the INPUTS are correct, the results will be EXACTLY right. That, BTW, is the case with all inductive processes. As the saying goes, garbage in, garbage out. If the winds are not as forecast, if you don't hold the heading precisely, the results will be erroneous. But that is not a f ault of the dead reckoning process. vince norris |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just as a dictionary tells us how a word is used by "ordinary" people, it also offers
information as to how a word might have been used by "ordinary" people to coin a new word or phrase. I was trying to say that the term "dead reckoning" was coined not by "ordinary people" but by specialists-- people who had a classical education, and knew the meanings of "deduction" and "induction." If you disagree, that's fine. While it's my opinion that the word "deduced" has nothing to do with the derivation of "dead reckoning"..... We agree on that. vince norris |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I hate to confuse anyone with the facts but the Oxford English Dictionary
2nd ed. has the following entry dead reckoning [dead /a./ V.] The estimation of a ship's position from the distance run by the log and the courses steered by the compass, with corrections for current, leeway, etc., but without astronomical observations. Hence /dead/ latitude (q.v.), that computed by dead reckoning. "*1613* M. Ridley /Magn. Bodies/ 147 Keeping a true, not a dead reckoning of his course." "*1760* Pemberton in /Phil. Trans./ LI. 911 The latitude exhibited by the dead reckoning of the ship." "*1840* R. H. Dana /Bef. Mast/ xxxii. 124 We had drifted too much to allow of our dead reckoning being anywhere near the mark." "*1891* /Nature/ 3 Sept., The log, which for the first time enabled the mariner to carry out his dead-reckoning with confidence, is first described in Bourne's ?Regiment for the Sea?, which was published in 1577." "*1917* Bosanquet & Campbell /Navigation for Aerial Navigators/ i. 4 In aerial navigation+Dead Reckoning is the position arrived at as calculated from the estimated track and the estimated speed made good over the ground." "/Ibid./ 5 These data enable us to find a Dead Reckoning position." "*1935* C. G. Burge /Compl. Bk. Aviation/ 477/1 Dead reckoning+is a compromise between pilotage and navigation." "*1868* Lowell /Witchcraft/ Prose Wks. 1890 II. 372 The mind, when it sails by dead reckoning+will sometimes bring up in strange latitudes." The log is the ships log - not a log in the water. It is interesting to note the distinction between pilotage, navigation and dead reckoning. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"vincent p. norris" wrote in message
... Yup. Also, "deduced reckoning" would be redundant, as reckoning is inherently deductive. "Deduction" means going from the universal to the particular, as in the classic example used in logic textbooks: All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Ergo, Socrates is mortal. INduction is the process of drawing inferences from PARTICULAR OBSERVATIONS, as in:: Socrates died. Aristotle died. Ptolemy died. Ergo, all men die. Dead reckoning starts with "inputting" particulars--the airspeed of MY airplane, the heading I AM going to fly TODAY, the CURRENT wind, and therefore, it is an example of induction, not deduction. Reasoning from the general to the particular, as in the syllogism you cited, is one of the earliest and simplest kinds of deduction to have been formalized. But any chain of reasoning that follows by necessity from general axioms constitutes deduction. Hence, deduction includes, for example, calculating that 2+2=4 (because that equation follows from the axioms of arithmetic, even though the equation addresses particular parameters). Similarly, it is deductive to reason from the axioms of Euclidean geometry that if I start at position x,y and travel in direction theta for t minutes at v knots, then I am at position x',y'. Induction, by contrast, involves a supposition that new instances will continue to resemble old instances (as in your example above), even though the contrary is logically possible. (To confuse matters, what's known as "mathematical induction" is actually a form of deduction.) Science is an inductive process. Statistics is inductive. Philososphy and theology are deductive. Science and philosophy make extensive use of both inductive and deductive reasoning. Mathematics is purely deductive. Statistics, as a branch of mathematics, is deductive, but using statistical reasoning to make predictions involves an inductive leap within deduced constraints. --Gary |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Daniel L. Lieberman" wrote:
The estimation of a ship's position from the distance run by the log and the courses steered by the compass, with corrections for current, leeway, etc., but without astronomical observations. Hence /dead/ latitude (q.v.), that computed by dead reckoning. The log is the ships log - not a log in the water. I suspect in this definition, they do mean a log in the water, in the form of a nautical log, which measured distance by counting knots or revolutions. http://91.1911encyclopedia.org/L/LO/LOG.htm |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 12:35:57 GMT, "Daniel L. Lieberman"
wrote: The log is the ships log - not a log in the water. Actually not. The log referred to was the object (originally rather like a log) thrown over the stern. It was attached to a string which had knots in it, and however many knots passed through the navigator's fingers in a given period of time measured the ship's speed. Thus log -- and thus knots. It enabled dead reckoning because it enabled the navigator to know the ship's speed more or less accurately. all the best -- Dan Ford email: (put Cubdriver in subject line) The Warbird's Forum www.warbirdforum.com Expedition sailboat charters www.expeditionsail.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 06:53:09 -0400, Cub Driver
wrote: On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 12:35:57 GMT, "Daniel L. Lieberman" wrote: The log is the ships log - not a log in the water. Actually not. The log referred to was the object (originally rather like a log) thrown over the stern. It was attached to a string which had knots in it, and however many knots passed through the navigator's fingers in a given period of time measured the ship's speed. Thus log -- and thus knots. It enabled dead reckoning because it enabled the navigator to know the ship's speed more or less accurately. Exactly--I think you've hit the nail on the head. More details from http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=log%20board show how the name of the book got derived from the log thrown overboard to calculate a ship's speed. I imagine that our "logging in" and "logging out" of computer systems is derived in turn from the ship's log book. 2. [Prob. the same word as in sense 1; cf. LG. log, lock, Dan. log, Sw. logg.] (Naut.) An apparatus for measuring the rate of a ship's motion through the water. Note: The common log consists of the log-chip, or logship, often exclusively called the log, and the log line, the former being commonly a thin wooden quadrant of five or six inches radius, loaded with lead on the arc to make it float with the point up. It is attached to the log line by cords from each corner. This line is divided into equal spaces, called knots, each bearing the same proportion to a mile that half a minute does to an hour. The line is wound on a reel which is so held as to let it run off freely. When the log is thrown, the log-chip is kept by the water from being drawn forward, and the speed of the ship is shown by the number of knots run out in half a minute. There are improved logs, consisting of a piece of mechanism which, being towed astern, shows the distance actually gone through by the ship, by means of the revolutions of a fly, which are registered on a dial plate. 3. Hence: The record of the rate of ship's speed or of her daily progress; also, the full nautical record of a ship's cruise or voyage; a log slate; a log book. 4. A record and tabulated statement of the work done by an engine, as of a steamship, of the coal consumed, and of other items relating to the performance of machinery during a given time. .... Log board (Naut.), a board consisting of two parts shutting together like a book, with columns in which are entered the direction of the wind, course of the ship, etc., during each hour of the day and night. These entries are transferred to the log book. A folding slate is now used instead. Log book, or Logbook (Naut.), a book in which is entered the daily progress of a ship at sea, as indicated by the log, with notes on the weather and incidents of the voyage; the contents of the log board. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 19th century log-chip: http://www.nmsi.ac.uk/piclib/imagerecord.asp?id=10284362 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Marty |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Airborne Dead Reckoning | GHMyst | Naval Aviation | 0 | January 25th 05 12:22 AM |
American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 10:46 PM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
Should Memorial Day and America's War Dead be commercialized? | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | May 24th 04 02:29 AM |
Should Memorial Day and America's War Dead be commercialized? | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | May 24th 04 02:29 AM |