![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello. Just reviewing the new 'Sport Pilot' regs for their
implications to me as a CFI. Looks like in 61.315(c), the FAA has kept the unfortunate limitation on being PIC of an aircraft 'in furtherance of a business' that they had on Recreational Pilots. Does anyone know of any 'official' FAA definition of this term? I looked in FAR 1.1, and couldn't find anything specific. I've talked with other CFIs about this and (surprise) there seems to be a difference of opinions about this. I think CFIs are like economists...put two CFIs in a room together and you end up with three contradictory opinions. My interpretation of this means that the flight itself may not be for the specific purpose of furthering a business, but that an 'incidental' activity at the destination related to the business is legal. For instance, I'm a sport pilot and fly to a destination to see a friend of mine who I also do business with. We play golf (the primary reason for the trip), but 'talk' some business during the golf match. The *purpose* of the trip was to play social golf with a friend, but the fact that we are playing golf and talking business may further my business. I can't imagine the FAA expects me to tell my partner "We can talk about anything else, but since I flew here, we can't talk about business." One CFI I talked to said basically that he thinks that the FAA expects *precisely* that. The that limitation precludes the exercise of the certificate for *any* flight where there is a reasonable expectation that business may be furthered as any result of that flight. I know this seems like splitting hairs, but many people have had 'interesting' experiences with the FAA because of misunderstandings or differences of opinions like this. So...doees anyone know of any enforcement actions or letters of interpretation where the FAA directly and specifically commented on this issue? Cheers, Cap |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Showstoppers (long, but interesting questions raised) | Anonymous Spamless | Military Aviation | 0 | April 21st 04 05:09 AM |
Associate Publisher Wanted - Aviation & Business Journals | Mergatroide | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | January 13th 04 08:26 PM |
Associate Publisher Wanted - Aviation & Business Journals | Mergatroide | General Aviation | 1 | January 13th 04 08:26 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
God Honest | Naval Aviation | 2 | July 24th 03 04:45 AM |