![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've been talking with a guy who is a new owner of a Bonanza. It has
a Continental IO-520 for an engine. It now has over 1800 hours and he's been looking at overhaul companies. I asked him what he was planning and he told me that the cheapest way to get an engine is to buy a brand new one from Continental, but he's reluctant to do that. He's reluctant because he said they typically require a top end overhaul at around 400 hours, that they never make TBO. In fact his airplane's engine was diagnosed with a leaking exhaust valve just a few days ago and has the cylinder off right now. John Deakin has also stated his opinion that Continental just cannot seem to manufacture an engine that lasts beyond 400 hours without requiring top end work. My acquaintence is leaning towards sending the engine to a builder that uses a non stock new cylinder for it's engines, and installs GAMI injectors as a standard. They dyno the engine to verify performance before shipping. This "overhaul" ends up costing more than a new Continental. So the question is: Is Continental really incapable of producing an engine that will actually last to TBO? Thanks, Corky Scott |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|