![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi!
I have a SL30 and a GNS 430 in my plane. They use the same antenna via a splitter. When I dial in the same VOR in both units the SL30 catches up the radials always between 20 and 50 nautical miles earlier than the GNS 430! (Altitude about 3000 ft, flat area) Is this normal? What is your experience? How far away do you have a reception of a VOR with your GNS 430? Fly safe! Maik |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I can't speak for the GNS 430, but the SL30 has UNBELIEVEABLE signal
processing capability. I can track a good VOR well over 100 miles, and I've got a mediocre cats whisker antenna mounted on my tail. I'm told the SL30 uses digital signal processing; I don't know what the GNS 430 uses. In short, I'm not at all surprised by your experience. Rich Maik wrote: Hi! I have a SL30 and a GNS 430 in my plane. They use the same antenna via a splitter. When I dial in the same VOR in both units the SL30 catches up the radials always between 20 and 50 nautical miles earlier than the GNS 430! (Altitude about 3000 ft, flat area) Is this normal? What is your experience? How far away do you have a reception of a VOR with your GNS 430? Fly safe! Maik |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It would seem that UPS-AT technology is significantly better than Garmin's.
Rich wrote: I can't speak for the GNS 430, but the SL30 has UNBELIEVEABLE signal processing capability. I can track a good VOR well over 100 miles, and I've got a mediocre cats whisker antenna mounted on my tail. I'm told the SL30 uses digital signal processing; I don't know what the GNS 430 uses. In short, I'm not at all surprised by your experience. Rich Maik wrote: Hi! I have a SL30 and a GNS 430 in my plane. They use the same antenna via a splitter. When I dial in the same VOR in both units the SL30 catches up the radials always between 20 and 50 nautical miles earlier than the GNS 430! (Altitude about 3000 ft, flat area) Is this normal? What is your experience? How far away do you have a reception of a VOR with your GNS 430? Fly safe! Maik |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On 29-Sep-2004, Rich wrote: I can't speak for the GNS 430, but the SL30 has UNBELIEVEABLE signal processing capability. I can track a good VOR well over 100 miles, and I've got a mediocre cats whisker antenna mounted on my tail. I'm told the SL30 uses digital signal processing; I don't know what the GNS 430 uses. In short, I'm not at all surprised by your experience. VOR reception range is dominantly determined by line-of-sight. However, in marginal situations (i.e. the station is just over the horizon) receiver quality and/or antenna cable loss can make a significant difference. I do not know if he VOR processing system in the GNS 430 is similar to the one used in the SL30, however a simpler explanation for the difference could be different RF losses in the cables from the splitter to the receiver. By the way, a VOR test system could quantify the sensitivity difference very quickly with a simple over-the-air test. -- -Elliott Drucker |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The VOR signal out of the receiver is a 9960Hz sine wave that is AM
modulated at 30Hz and FM modulated at 30Hz. The phase difference between the AM and FM signals is the bearing to the station. Outside of the standard service volume of a VOR, this signal starts to get quite noisy. This makes domodulating the AM and FM components more difficult as the signal to noise ratio degrades. The quality of the filtering of the 30Hz and 9960Hz bandpass filters (or equivalent digital bandpass filters in a DSP) determines how far out you can accurately receive the station. Apparently the SL30 does a better job of filtering out the noise than the GNS430. Dean Maik wrote in message ... Hi! I have a SL30 and a GNS 430 in my plane. They use the same antenna via a splitter. When I dial in the same VOR in both units the SL30 catches up the radials always between 20 and 50 nautical miles earlier than the GNS 430! (Altitude about 3000 ft, flat area) Is this normal? What is your experience? How far away do you have a reception of a VOR with your GNS 430? Fly safe! Maik |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The VOR signal out of the receiver is a 9960Hz sine wave that is AM modulated at 30Hz and FM modulated at 30Hz. The phase difference between the AM and FM signals is the bearing to the station. How does that work. =Something= has to be directional, no? Jose -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Teacherjh" wrote in message ... The VOR signal out of the receiver is a 9960Hz sine wave that is AM modulated at 30Hz and FM modulated at 30Hz. The phase difference between the AM and FM signals is the bearing to the station. How does that work. =Something= has to be directional, no? Yes, one of the two signals is swept directionally either by electronic or mechanical means (it doesn't matter which one as long as they are moving in the right direction relative to the other). |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I wouldn't be satisfied with the answer that one unit is more sensitive or
has better demod until I knew that the splitter, connectors, and coax were all in good shape. Then I'd wonder if the Garmin was detuned somehow instead of jumping right on poor or lesser design. Dan |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jose,
The FM component goes out the same in all directions from the VOR station. The AM component varies with the angle from the station. North of the station there is no phase difference. At 45 degrees the AM component lags the FM component by 45 degrees, and so on. The AM component is phase shifted by a phased-array of antennas around the VOR station. Dean (Teacherjh) wrote in message ... The VOR signal out of the receiver is a 9960Hz sine wave that is AM modulated at 30Hz and FM modulated at 30Hz. The phase difference between the AM and FM signals is the bearing to the station. How does that work. =Something= has to be directional, no? Jose |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not quite.
There is a subcarrier modulation on the main carrier that is 9960 Hz. amplitude modulated onto the main carrier. The subcarrier is FM modulated with a 30 Hz. reference signal. The subcarrier is transmitted equally in all directions. The carrier is also transmitted by a series of antennas spaced around the station. These antennas are fed by a mechanism rotating at 30 Hz. and phaselocked to the subcarrier reference. The rotating antenna is calibrated so that the rotating signal and the reference signal are perfectly in phase at due north of the station. As you rotate around the station, the phase between the rotated (variable) and constant (reference) signal changes degree of phase for degree of rotation. (There is another way of doing it, far more technically difficult to explain.) Jim (Teacherjh) shared these priceless pearls of wisdom: - -The VOR signal out of the receiver is a 9960Hz sine wave that is AM -modulated at 30Hz and FM modulated at 30Hz. The phase difference -between the AM and FM signals is the bearing to the station. - - -How does that work. =Something= has to be directional, no? - -Jose Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup) VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor http://www.rst-engr.com |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Amateur Review of the Garmin GPSMAP 296 GPS | Rhett | Piloting | 10 | March 23rd 05 01:16 AM |
Pirep: Garmin GPSMAP 296 versus 295. (very long) | Jon Woellhaf | Piloting | 12 | September 4th 04 11:55 PM |
garmin 296 | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 1 | June 16th 04 06:59 PM |
Garmin DME arc weidnress | Dave Touretzky | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | October 2nd 03 02:04 AM |
Garmin 90 Database Updates Discontinued | Val Christian | Piloting | 14 | August 20th 03 09:32 PM |