![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi folks,
I've always seen spoilers and flaps being deployed fully upon landing. While the reason for spoilers is straightforward, I haven't yet figured why flaps are deployed too. Isn't the landing roll the time when you'd be wanting all the load of the craft to be on the main wheels, which is where the brakes are, instead of creating lift whereby the load gets transferred onto the wings and possibly lessening the braking effect? I know the plane would be decelerating all the time with the engines throttled back fully and even the forward thrust depolyed, perhaps, yet why create any lift possibility at all? Wouldn't braking be more effective with no flaps deployed? Or does the drag produced by the flaps compensate for the lift? I suspect I've missed something really fundamental ![]() Ramapriya |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ramapriya" wrote in message
oups.com... I've always seen spoilers and flaps being deployed fully upon landing. While the reason for spoilers is straightforward, I haven't yet figured why flaps are deployed too. Flaps only improve lift to a point. Even on the little planes, past that point they simply add drag. So yes, what you're seeing is the use of flaps to create a lot of drag. The spoilers accomplish that too, and at the same time "spoil" the lift the wing might otherwise create (with or without the flaps). How much of each does what, I can't say. Suffice to say, with spoilers and flaps fully extended, there's LOTS of drag, and very little lift. Pete |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() duniho wrote: I've always seen spoilers and flaps being deployed fully upon landing. While the reason for spoilers is straightforward, I haven't yet figured why flaps are deployed too. [...] Flaps only improve lift to a point. Even on the little planes, past that point they simply add drag. [...] That only explains why one might prefer 40degrees over 30degrees of flaps. There is still lift generated at both those settings. This is why, on some small airplanes, the official short-field landing procedure involves raising flaps on rollout. That way, lift is reduced and maximum weight is applied to the main wheels where the brakes are. People flying retractable-gear airplanes are sometimes taught not to bother, in order to avoid playing with the gear selector instead by mistake. - FChE |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The answer to you question is primarily that the flaps allow the
aircraft to gly and touch down at a lower airspeed due to the additional lift they produce. As a result if the airplane touches down 10 mph slower then that is 10 knots less that it has to decelerate on the runway and a lot less energy that the brakes and tires have to absorb. Brian CFIIG/ASEL |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What you are saying is true. It is for this reason that some people retract
flaps after touchdown when doing short field landings. However, the lifting effect of flaps after touchdown is pretty minor. The lift decreases as the square of the airspeed. So lift drops off very fast as you decelerate. "Ramapriya" wrote in news:1103888251.673617.173970 @f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com: Hi folks, I've always seen spoilers and flaps being deployed fully upon landing. While the reason for spoilers is straightforward, I haven't yet figured why flaps are deployed too. Isn't the landing roll the time when you'd be wanting all the load of the craft to be on the main wheels, which is where the brakes are, instead of creating lift whereby the load gets transferred onto the wings and possibly lessening the braking effect? I know the plane would be decelerating all the time with the engines throttled back fully and even the forward thrust depolyed, perhaps, yet why create any lift possibility at all? Wouldn't braking be more effective with no flaps deployed? Or does the drag produced by the flaps compensate for the lift? I suspect I've missed something really fundamental ![]() Ramapriya |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As a result if the airplane touches down 10 mph slower then that is 10
knots less that it has to decelerate on the runway and a lot less energy that the brakes and tires have to absorb. ---------------------------- Agree. Energy is a function of velocity squared, so touching down at, say, 40K ground speed instead of 50k results in about 35% less energy to dissipate on rollout - dramatically shortening the landing roll (and wear-and-tear on the machine). Engineer and Former CFII |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Big airplane, lots of weight. Notice that the big guys have a HUGE
difference in their takeoff weight compared to their max landing weight. So with spoilers, they kill off the excess lift while making use of the drag of the flaps (excess lift becomes an issue in ground effect). This lessens the load on the gear as they touch down (as opposed to the solo student slam down ;-) ). And if they really have to stop, I'm told they don't touch the brakes until after full reverser deployment (I am assuming here that from their touch down speed of 120-180 knots, they kill off 30-50% via reverse thrust). But, I'm still learning and I may not have all of this correct. But it is how it all appears to me in thinking about the physics involved. Later, Steve.T PP ASEL/Instrument |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... "Ramapriya" wrote in message oups.com... I've always seen spoilers and flaps being deployed fully upon landing. While the reason for spoilers is straightforward, I haven't yet figured why flaps are deployed too. Flaps only improve lift to a point. Even on the little planes, past that point they simply add drag. Just a nitpick here- there's a huge difference in design and efficiency between the simple flaps you see on most small planes and the fowler jobs found on transport jets. If you put slats and fowlers on a typical GA plane's wing you'll get a STOL monster like the Helio Courier. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I subscribe to the theory that after slowing below stall speed, like during
the landing roll, flaps do not add any lift to speak of, mainly drag. -Frank "Ramapriya" wrote in message oups.com... Hi folks, I've always seen spoilers and flaps being deployed fully upon landing. While the reason for spoilers is straightforward, I haven't yet figured why flaps are deployed too. Isn't the landing roll the time when you'd be wanting all the load of the craft to be on the main wheels, which is where the brakes are, instead of creating lift whereby the load gets transferred onto the wings and possibly lessening the braking effect? I know the plane would be decelerating all the time with the engines throttled back fully and even the forward thrust depolyed, perhaps, yet why create any lift possibility at all? Wouldn't braking be more effective with no flaps deployed? Or does the drag produced by the flaps compensate for the lift? I suspect I've missed something really fundamental ![]() Ramapriya |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 24 Dec 2004 03:37:31 -0800, "Ramapriya" wrote:
Hi folks, I've always seen spoilers and flaps being deployed fully upon landing. While the reason for spoilers is straightforward, I haven't yet figured why flaps are deployed too. Isn't the landing roll the time when you'd be wanting all the load of the craft to be on the main wheels, which is where the brakes are I find that in the Deb, full flaps help shorten the roll out. A short field landing is a steep approach with substantial power and relatively slow. Vso for me alone and partial fuel is only 55 MPH ( ~ 48 knots) at roughly 2700#. This is for a pretty slipery airplane. In the Deb, as soon as the mains are on the runway, let the nose down, get on the brakes and full up elevator. If you don't get on the brakes first it's going right back up in ground effect which could prove to be more than a little inconvenient. instead of creating lift whereby the load gets transferred onto the wings and possibly lessening the braking effect? I know the plane would In many planes with electric flaps there is little if anything to be gained by raising them as you are slowing to the point where they have pretty much lost their effect well before they are all the way up. be decelerating all the time with the engines throttled back fully and even the forward thrust depolyed, perhaps, yet why create any lift possibility at all? Wouldn't braking be more effective with no flaps deployed? Or does the drag produced by the flaps compensate for the lift? Aerodynamic braking works great. OTOH, flying an old Hershey Bar Winged Cherokee 180 with the Johnson bar flaps, raising the flaps on touchdown on a short sod strip made a considerable difference. I suspect I've missed something really fundamental ![]() I think basically it depends on the plane. Worked on the Cherokee, doesn't on the Deb. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com Ramapriya |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Skycraft Landing Light Question | Jay Honeck | Owning | 15 | February 3rd 05 06:49 PM |
VW-1 C-121J landing with unlocked nose wheel | Mel Davidow LT USNR Ret | Military Aviation | 1 | January 19th 04 05:22 AM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
Good feeling landing / 200th hour | Yossarian | Piloting | 22 | December 23rd 03 12:44 AM |
Off topic - Landing of a B-17 | Ghost | Home Built | 2 | October 28th 03 04:35 PM |