![]()  | 
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. | 
		
			
  | 	
	
	
		
		|||||||
| 
		 | 
	Thread Tools | Display Modes | 
| 
		 
			 
			#1  
			 
            
			
			
			
		 
		
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
	
	
		
			
			 
.....have an option for a constant speed prop prior to 1975? 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
		 
		
	
	
	 | 
| 
		 
			 
			#2  
			 
            
			
			
			
		 
		
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
	
	
		
			
			 
In article uRKxd.2426$2X6.28@trnddc07, 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
		 
		
	
	
	"Casey Wilson" wrote: ....have an option for a constant speed prop prior to 1975? Not from Piper. -- Bob Noel looking for a sig the lawyers will like  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#3  
			 
            
			
			
			
		 
		
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
	
	
		
			
			 
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 01:18:18 GMT, "Casey Wilson"  
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
		 
		
	
	
	wrote: ....have an option for a constant speed prop prior to 1975? No. There are aftermarket conversions for the -A3A engines that have the hollow crank shaft. MT-Propellers has an STC for an electric (3-bladed?) CS prop.  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#4  
			 
            
			
			
			
		 
		
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
	
	
		
			
			 
How many knots would be gained with this? 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
		 
		
	
	
	"Nathan Young" wrote in message ... On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 01:18:18 GMT, "Casey Wilson" wrote: ....have an option for a constant speed prop prior to 1975? No. There are aftermarket conversions for the -A3A engines that have the hollow crank shaft. MT-Propellers has an STC for an electric (3-bladed?) CS prop.  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#5  
			 
            
			
			
			
		 
		
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
	
	
		
			
			 
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 21:46:57 -0800, "aluckyguess"  wrote: 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
		 
		
	
	
	How many knots would be gained with this? The consensus is little top end would be gained, although a few additional knots would be possible by allowing the engine to operate at higher power at lower altitudes. See this google thread for a discussion on fixed pitch vs. C/S. http://makeashorterlink.com/?Y5531281A  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#6  
			 
            
			
			
			
		 
		
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
	
	
		
			
			 "aluckyguess" wrote in message ... How many knots would be gained with this? Hi Lucky, Congrats on the license! Think of a CS propeller as an overdrive. Simply, it's purpose is to lower the fuel consumption by taking a bigger bite of air in cruise. You basically get the same cruise speed for less rpms. Properly used, a CS prop also helps to maximize engine life. Improper or misuse of a CS prop can render even a new airplane to glider status quickly,especially turbo equipped aircraft. There are other benefits and caveats, you will learn them if you go for a complex endorsement. HTH, Marty  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#7  
			 
            
			
			
			
		 
		
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
	
	
		
			
			 "Marty" wrote in message ... "aluckyguess" wrote in message ... How many knots would be gained with this? Hi Lucky, Congrats on the license! Think of a CS propeller as an overdrive. Simply, it's purpose is to lower the fuel consumption by taking a bigger bite of air in cruise. You basically get the same cruise speed for less rpms. Properly used, a CS prop also helps to maximize engine life. Improper or misuse of a CS prop can render even a new airplane to glider status quickly,especially turbo equipped aircraft. There are other benefits and caveats, you will learn them if you go for a complex endorsement. HTH, Marty Thanks  | 
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
		
  | 
	
		
  |